The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the Potential Efficacy of Invasive Lionfish (Pterois volitans) Removals
Open accessAbstract
The lionfish, Pterois volitans (Linnaeus) and Pterois miles (Bennett), invasion of the Western Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico has the potential to alter aquatic communities and represents a legitimate ecological concern. Several local removal programs have been initiated to control this invasion, but it is not known whether removal efforts can substantially reduce lionfish numbers to ameliorate these concerns. We used an age-structured population model to evaluate the potential efficacy of lionfish removal programs and identified critical data gaps for future studies. We used high and low estimates for uncertain parameters including: length at 50% vulnerability to harvest (L(vul)), instantaneous natural mortality (M), and the Goodyear compensation ratio (CR). The model predicted an annual exploitation rate between 35 and 65% would be required to cause recruitment overfishing on lionfish populations for our baseline parameter estimates for M and CR (0.5 and 15). Lionfish quickly recovered from high removal rates, reaching 90% of unfished biomass six years after a 50-year simulated removal program. Quantifying lionfish natural mortality and the size-selective vulnerability to harvest are the most important knowledge gaps for future research. We suggest complete eradication of lionfish through fishing is unlikely, and substantial reduction of adult abundance will require a long-term commitment and may be feasible only in small, localized areas where annual exploitation can be intense over multiple consecutive years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“To date, two studies have used modeling to predict responses of lionfish populations to removals (Barbour et al., 2011;Morris et al., 2011a).”
From Reproductive biology of invasive lionfish (Pterois spp.) (2015) · cites this paper as Barbour et al., 2011
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Both of these studies relied on parameters that were not derived from data on lionfish reproduction in the Caribbean.”
From Reproductive biology of invasive lionfish (Pterois spp.) (2015) · cites this paper as Barbour et al., 2011
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The majority of lionfish control efforts to date have focused on manual removal27”
From Invasive lionfish reduce native fish abundance on a regional scale (2016) · cites this paper as [27]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“lionfish are not effectively targeted by standard fishing gears such as fish traps or hook-and line.”
From Invasive lionfish reduce native fish abundance on a regional scale (2016) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Catastrophes, Phase Shifts, and Large-Scale Degradation of a Caribbean Coral Reef
Hughes, T. P. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.265.5178.1547 · Cited by 2,915
BECK, M. W., HECK, K. L., ABLE, K. W., CHILDERS, D. L., EGGLESTON, D. B., GILLANDERS, B. M., HALPERN, B., HAYS, C. G., HOSHINO, K., MINELLO, T. J., et al. (2001) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0633:ticamo]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,642
Mangroves enhance the biomass of coral reef fish communities in the Caribbean
Mumby, P. J., Edwards, A. J., Arias‐González, J. E., Lindeman, K. C., Blackwell, P. G., Gall, A., Gorczynska, M. I., Harborne, A. R., Pescod, C. L., Renken, H., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02286 · Cited by 1,121
Fisheries Ecology and Management
Walters, C. J., & Martell, S. J. D. (2005) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691214634 · Cited by 860
Invasive Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans reduce recruitment of Atlantic coral-reef fishes
Albins, M., & Hixon, M. (2008) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps07620 · Cited by 544
Maximum reproductive rate of fish at low population sizes
Myers, R. A., Bowen, K. G., & Barrowman, N. J. (1999) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f99-201 · Cited by 506
Fisheries Ecology and Management
Pepin, P. (2005) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2005.00191.x · Cited by 474
Marine nurseries and effective juvenile habitats: concepts and applications
Dahlgren, C., Kellison, G. T., Adams, A., Gillanders, B. M., Kendall, M., Layman, C., Ley, J., Nagelkerken, I., & Serafy, J. (2006) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps312291 · Cited by 450
Nagelkerken, I., Roberts, C. M., van der Velde, G., DORENBOSCH, M., van Riel, M. C., de la Morinière, E. C., & Nienhuis, P. H. (2002) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps244299 · Cited by 409
Mace, P. M. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f94-013 · Cited by 398
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- JC Potts, Age and growth of lionfish from the Western North Atlantic., Proceedings of the 63
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Invasive Lionfish Drive Atlantic Coral Reef Fish Declines
Green, S. J., Akins, J. L., Maljković, A., & Côté, I. M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032596 · Cited by 434
“Given the broad geographic extent of the invasion, complete eradication of lionfish from the Atlantic appears unlikely [12].”
BackgroundPredatory fish invaders: Insights from Indo-Pacific lionfish in the western Atlantic and Caribbean
Côté, I. M., Green, S. J., & Hixon, M. A. (2013) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.014 · Cited by 269
“The exploitation rates necessary to cause these reductions are high (e.g., 27–65% of the population per annum), and cessation of removals leads to quick lionfish recovery (Arias-González et al., 2011; Barbour et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInvasive Species: to eat or not to eat, that is the question
Nuñez, M. A., Kuebbing, S. E., Dimarco, R. D., & Simberloff, D. (2012) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00250.x · Cited by 183
“These models have been used to direct management strategies, including selecting the appropriate life stage to target for management of invasive plants and animals (Ramula et al. 2008; Barbour et al. 2011).”
BackgroundMethodExternal morphology explains the success of biological invasions
Azzurro, E., Tuset, V. M., Lombarte, A., Maynou, F., Simberloff, D., Rodríguez‐Pérez, A., & Solé, R. V. (2014) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12351 · Cited by 141
“Invasive species are difficult to control, particularly in the marine environment (Barbour et al. 2011), making the ability to understand what species can develop abundant populations vitally important for assessing the risk of unwanted introductions.”
BackgroundProgression of invasive lionfish in seagrass, mangrove and reef habitats
Claydon, J. A. B., Calosso, M. C., & Traiger, S. B. (2011) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps09534 · Cited by 131
“Herein collectively referred to as red lionfish, these species have spread throughout the southeast coast of the USA, through the tropical western Atlantic, the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico, and are predicted to continue expanding their range south (Schofield 2009, 2010), possibly as far as Uruguay (Morris & W…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Barbour, A. B., Allen, M. S., Frazer, T. K., & Sherman, K. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barbour, Andrew B.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-05-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e19666
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3091870
- OpenAlex
- W2012613333
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 13.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2011-05-31)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0802270)
- University of Florida
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- National Marine Fisheries Service
- National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science
- Southeast Fisheries Science Center
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
- Keywords
- invasive lionfish, Pterois volitans, Pterois miles, invasive species management, recruitment overfishing, exploitation rate, natural mortality, population recovery, age-structured population model, western Atlantic, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Body Weight, Computer Simulation, Conservation of Natural Resources, Female, Male, Models, Biological, North Carolina, Perciformes, Introduced Species
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
