Cited by 71Circadian rhythm and melatoninCoral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology

Circadian clock gene expression in the coral Favia fragum over diel and lunar reproductive cycles

Open access
Hoadley, Kenneth D., Szmant, Alina M., Pyott, Sonja J.·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Natural light cycles synchronize behavioral and physiological cycles over varying time periods in both plants and animals. Many scleractinian corals exhibit diel cycles of polyp expansion and contraction entrained by diel sunlight patterns, and monthly cycles of spawning or planulation that correspond to lunar moonlight cycles. The molecular mechanisms for regulating such cycles are poorly understood. In this study, we identified four molecular clock genes (cry1, cry2, clock and cycle) in the scleractinian coral, Favia fragum, and investigated patterns of gene expression hypothesized to be involved in the corals' diel polyp behavior and lunar reproductive cycles. Using quantitative PCR, we measured fluctuations in expression of these clock genes over both diel and monthly spawning timeframes. Additionally, we assayed gene expression and polyp expansion-contraction behavior in experimental corals in normal light:dark (control) or constant dark treatments. Well-defined and reproducible diel patterns in cry1, cry2, and clock expression were observed in both field-collected and the experimental colonies maintained under control light:dark conditions, but no pattern was observed for cycle. Colonies in the control light:dark treatment also displayed diel rhythms of tentacle expansion and contraction. Experimental colonies in the constant dark treatment lost diel patterns in cry1, cry2, and clock expression and displayed a diminished and less synchronous pattern of tentacle expansion and contraction. We observed no pattern in cry1, cry2, clock, or cycle expression correlated with monthly spawning events suggesting these genes are not involved in the entrainment of reproductive cycles to lunar light cycles in F. fragum. Our results suggest a molecular clock mechanism, potentially similar to that in described in fruit flies, exists within F. fragum.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0019755

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Favia fragum, circadian clock transcripts for cry1, cry2, clk, and cyc showed differences between lunar phases, but without regular patterns.

    “In the Caribbean reef coral Favia fragum, which in contrast to A. millipora reproduces monthly in precise lunar patterns, 4–5 days after FM [32], circadian clock transcripts for cry1, cry2, clk, and cyc showed differences between lunar phases, but without regular patterns [33].”
  • In Favia fragum, cry1 and cry2 orthologs exhibit light-controlled daily oscillations and transcript level differences between different moon phases.

    “Both genes exhibit light-controlled daily oscillations and also transcript level differences between different moon phases (27).”

    From An Overview of Monthly Rhythms and Clocks (2017) · cites this paper as [27]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Szmant-Froelich A Reutter M Riggs L 1985 Sexual reproduction of Favia fragum (Esper): lunar patterns of gametogenesis, embryogenesis and planulation in Puerto-Rico. Bulletin of Marine Science 37 880 892

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoadley, K. D., Szmant, A. M., & Pyott, S. J.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina Wilmington (US)
Corresponding author
Pyott, Sonja J.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-05-06
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
e19755
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031422709
Cited by
71
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of North Carolina Wilmington
  • University of California Merced
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Keywords
clock genes, Favia fragum, scleractinian corals, CRY1, CRY2, cycle gene, diel rhythm, lunar spawning, reproductive cycle, entrainment, constant darkness, gene expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Darkness, Gene Expression Regulation, Phylogeny, Reproduction, Moon, Photoperiod, Anthozoa, CLOCK Proteins, Circadian Clocks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review