Cited by 56Circadian rhythm and melatoninCoral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology

Circadian cycles of gene expression in the coral, Acropora millepora

Open access
Brady, Aisling K., Snyder, Kevin A., Vize, Peter D.·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Circadian rhythms regulate many physiological, behavioral and reproductive processes. These rhythms are often controlled by light, and daily cycles of solar illumination entrain many clock regulated processes. In scleractinian corals a number of different processes and behaviors are associated with specific periods of solar illumination or non-illumination--for example, skeletal deposition, feeding and both brooding and broadcast spawning. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have undertaken an analysis of diurnal expression of the whole transcriptome and more focused studies on a number of candidate circadian genes in the coral Acropora millepora using deep RNA sequencing and quantitative PCR. Many examples of diurnal cycles of RNA abundance were identified, some of which are light responsive and damped quickly under constant darkness, for example, cryptochrome 1 and timeless, but others that continue to cycle in a robust manner when kept in constant darkness, for example, clock, cryptochrome 2, cycle and eyes absent, indicating that their transcription is regulated by an endogenous clock entrained to the light-dark cycle. Many other biological processes that varied between day and night were also identified by a clustering analysis of gene ontology annotations. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Corals exhibit diurnal patterns of gene expression that may participate in the regulation of circadian biological processes. Rhythmic cycles of gene expression occur under constant darkness in both populations of coral larvae that lack zooxanthellae and in individual adult tissue containing zooxanthellae, indicating that transcription is under the control of a biological clock. In addition to genes potentially involved in regulating circadian processes, many other pathways were found to display diel cycles of transcription.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0025072

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Further studies employing artificial illumination mimicking both light/dark cycles and moonlight provided conflicting results for some of the above-mentioned data collected under natural light conditions.

    “It has to be noted that further studies employing artificial illumination mimicking both light/dark cycles and moonlight provided conflicting results for some of the above-mentioned data collected under natural light conditions.”
  • In Acropora millepora, only cry1 (but not cry2) was affected by exposure to DD, whereas cry2 increased under natural moonlight compared to artificial one during both LQM and FM.

    “For instance, only cry1 (but not cry2) was affected by exposure to DD, whereas, although not significantly, cry2 increased under natural moonlight compared to the artificial one during both LQM and FM [27,31].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brady, A. K., Snyder, K. A., & Vize, P. D.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Vize, Peter D.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-09-19
Volume
6
Issue
9
Pages
e25072
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996282927
Cited by
56
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Alberta Innovates
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD45776, R01HD045776, P41HD064556)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Keywords
circadian rhythm, diel gene expression, Acropora millepora, scleractinian corals, clock genes, cryptochrome, TIMELESS, cycle gene, eyes absent, light entrainment, constant darkness, coral larvae, zooxanthellae
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Clocks, Circadian Rhythm, Darkness, Gene Expression Regulation, Light, RNA, Messenger, Biomarkers, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Anthozoa, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review