Cited by 381Data-Driven Disease SurveillanceInfluenza Virus Research StudiesRespiratory viral infections research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing Google Flu Trends Performance in the United States during the 2009 Influenza Virus A (H1N1) Pandemic

Open access
Cook, Samantha, Conrad, Corrie, Fowlkes, Ashley L., Mohebbi, Matthew H.·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Google Flu Trends (GFT) uses anonymized, aggregated internet search activity to provide near-real time estimates of influenza activity. GFT estimates have shown a strong correlation with official influenza surveillance data. The 2009 influenza virus A (H1N1) pandemic [pH1N1] provided the first opportunity to evaluate GFT during a non-seasonal influenza outbreak. In September 2009, an updated United States GFT model was developed using data from the beginning of pH1N1. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We evaluated the accuracy of each U.S. GFT model by comparing weekly estimates of ILI (influenza-like illness) activity with the U.S. Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet). For each GFT model we calculated the correlation and RMSE (root mean square error) between model estimates and ILINet for four time periods: pre-H1N1, Summer H1N1, Winter H1N1, and H1N1 overall (Mar 2009-Dec 2009). We also compared the number of queries, query volume, and types of queries (e.g., influenza symptoms, influenza complications) in each model. Both models' estimates were highly correlated with ILINet pre-H1N1 and over the entire surveillance period, although the original model underestimated the magnitude of ILI activity during pH1N1. The updated model was more correlated with ILINet than the original model during Summer H1N1 (r = 0.95 and 0.29, respectively). The updated model included more search query terms than the original model, with more queries directly related to influenza infection, whereas the original model contained more queries related to influenza complications. CONCLUSIONS: Internet search behavior changed during pH1N1, particularly in the categories "influenza complications" and "term for influenza." The complications associated with pH1N1, the fact that pH1N1 began in the summer rather than winter, and changes in health-seeking behavior each may have played a part. Both GFT models performed well prior to and during pH1N1, although the updated model performed better during pH1N1, especially during the summer months.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0023610

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Time series plots of ILINet data and original and updated GFT estimates. A) ILINet data and GFT estimates from 2009. B) ILINet data and GFT estimates for the entire time period where GFT estimates are available: 2003–2009.
Figure 1 Time series plots of ILINet data and original and updated GFT estimates. A) ILINet data and GFT estimates from 2009. B) ILINet data and GFT estimates for the entire time period where GFT estimates are available: 2003–2009.CC0 · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Time series plots of ILINet data and category-level GFT estimates. Category-level estimates are created by applying the GFT methodology to a subset of the queries in a given model. A) ILINet data and GFT estimates based on original model queries related to influenza complications. B) ILINet data and GFT estimates based on updated model queries related to specific influenza symptoms.
Figure 2 Time series plots of ILINet data and category-level GFT estimates. Category-level estimates are created by applying the GFT methodology to a subset of the queries in a given model. A) ILINet data and GFT estimates based on original model queries related to influenza complications. B) ILINet data and GFT estimates based on updated model queries related to specific influenza symptoms.CC0 · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Time series plots of ILINet data and query-level GFT estimates. Query-level estimates are created by applying the GFT methodology to the search activity for a single query. A) ILINet data and GFT estimates based on the query [symptoms of flu]. B) ILINet data and GFT estimates based on the query [symptoms of bronchitis]. C) ILINet data and GFT estimates based on the query [symptoms of pneumonia].
Figure 3 Time series plots of ILINet data and query-level GFT estimates. Query-level estimates are created by applying the GFT methodology to the search activity for a single query. A) ILINet data and GFT estimates based on the query [symptoms of flu]. B) ILINet data and GFT estimates based on the query [symptoms of bronchitis]. C) ILINet data and GFT estimates based on the query [symptoms of pneumonia].CC0 · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–379 of 379

Metadata

Authors
Cook, S., Conrad, C., Fowlkes, A. L., & Mohebbi, M. H.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Google (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Conrad, Corrie
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-08-19
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
e23610
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998956117
Cited by
381
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 9
FWCI
18.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Google
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
Keywords
Google Flu Trends, influenza surveillance, 2009 H1N1 pandemic, influenza-like illness, online search behavior, health-seeking behavior, model accuracy assessment
MeSH terms
Humans, Influenza, Human, Models, Biological, Population Surveillance, Time Factors, United States, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Search Engine, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review