Cited by 539Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFossil Insects in Amber

The smallest known non-avian theropod dinosaur

Xu, Xing, Zhou, Zhonghe, Wang, Xiaolin·2000·Nature

Abstract

Non-avian dinosaurs are mostly medium to large-sized animals, and to date all known mature specimens are larger than the most primitive bird, Archaeopteryx. Here we report on a new dromaeosaurid dinosaur, Microraptor zhaoianus gen. et sp. nov., from the Early Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation of Liaoning, China. This is the first mature non-avian dinosaur to be found that is smaller than Archaeopteryx, and it eliminates the size disparity between the earliest birds and their closest non-avian theropod relatives. The more bird-like teeth, the Rahonavis-like ischium and the small number of caudal vertebrae of Microraptor are unique among dromaeosaurids and improve our understanding of the morphological transition to birds. The nearly completely articulated foot shows features, such as distally positioned digit I, slender and recurved pedal claws, and elongated penultimate phalanges, that are comparable to those of arboreal birds. The discovery of these in non-avian theropods provides new insights for studying the palaeoecology of some bird-like theropod dinosaurs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35047056

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ilium of DLXH 1218 is small compared to the femur (ilium/femur length ratio approximately 0.60), a condition in Archaeopteryx and basal dromaeosaurids; in most other theropods the ilium is more than 70% the length of the femur.

    “The ilium is small in size in comparison to the femur (ilium/femur length ratio is ∼0.60), which is the condition in Archaeopteryx and basal dromaeosaurids41. In most other theropods, the ilium is more than 70% the length of the femur.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, X., Zhou, Z., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Xing
Venue
Nature
Published
2000-12
Volume
408
Issue
6813
Pages
705-708
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1677119557
Cited by
539
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 33
FWCI
39.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
Keywords
dromaeosaurids, Archaeopteryx, dinosaur-bird transition, Jiufotang Formation, Lower Cretaceous, foot morphology, caudal vertebrae, paleoecology
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Reptiles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review