Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overexpression of YAP and TAZ Is an Independent Predictor of Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer and Related to the Proliferation and Metastasis of Colon Cancer Cells

Open access
Wang, Lijuan, Shi, Shengjia, Guo, Zhangyan, Zhang, Xiang, Han, Suxia, Yang, Angang, Wen, Weihong, Zhu, Qing·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) are nuclear effectors of the Hippo pathway. Although they are abundantly expressed in the cytoplasm and nuclei of human colorectal cancer (CRC), and related to tumor proliferation status, there have been few studies on the predictive role of YAP and TAZ expression on the overall survival of patients with CRC. This study investigated YAP and TAZ expression in both CRC patients and colon cancer cell lines, and assessed their prognostic value. METHODS: Paraffin-embedded specimens from 168 eligible patients were used to investigate YAP and TAZ expression by immunohistochemistry, and compared with experimental results in colon cancer HCT116 cell line to explore their clinical significance in CRC. RESULTS: Statistically significant positive correlations were found between protein expression of YAP and TAZ in CRC tissues. Patients with higher YAP or TAZ expression showed a trend of shorter survival times; more importantly, our cohort study indicated that patients with both YAP and TAZ overexpression presented the worst outcomes. This was supported by multivariate analysis. In HCT116 colon cancer cells, the capacity for proliferation, metastasis, and invasion was dramatically reduced by knockdown of YAP and TAZ expressions by siRNA. CONCLUSIONS: Co-overexpression of YAP and TAZ is an independent predictor of prognosis for patients with CRC, and may account for the higher proliferation, metastasis, and poor survival outcome of these patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0065539This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L., Shi, S., Guo, Z., Zhang, X., Han, S., Yang, A., Wen, W., & Zhu, Q.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-06-10
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
e65539
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041401454
Cited by
267
References
5
FWCI
13.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overexpression of YAP and TAZ Is an Independent Predictor of Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer and Related to the Proliferation and Metastasis of Colon Cancer Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0065539
The paper
Wang, L., Shi, S., Guo, Z., Zhang, X., Han, S., Yang, A., Wen, W., & Zhu, Q. (2013). Overexpression of YAP and TAZ Is an Independent Predictor of Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer and Related to the Proliferation and Metastasis of Colon Cancer Cells. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065539

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.