Cited by 20Mind wandering and attentionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Neural Activity Changes Associated with Impulsive Responding in the Sustained Attention to Response Task

Open access
Sakai, Hiroyuki, Uchiyama, Yuji, Shin, Duk, Hayashi, Masamichi J., Sadato, Norihiro·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Humans can anticipate and prepare for uncertainties to achieve a goal. However, it is difficult to maintain this effort over a prolonged period of time. Inappropriate behavior is impulsively (or mindlessly) activated by an external trigger, which can result in serious consequences such as traffic crashes. Thus, we examined the neural mechanisms underlying such impulsive responding using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Twenty-two participants performed a block-designed sustained attention to response task (SART), where each task block was composed of consecutive Go trials followed by a NoGo trial at the end. This task configuration enabled us to measure compromised preparation for NoGo trials during Go responses using reduced Go reaction times. Accordingly, parametric modulation analysis was conducted on fMRI data using block-based mean Go reaction times as an online marker of impulsive responding in the SART. We found that activity in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the bilateral intraparietal sulcus (IPS) was positively modulated with mean Go reaction times. In addition, activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) was negatively modulated with mean Go reaction times, albeit statistically weakly. Taken together, spontaneously reduced activity in the right DLPFC and the IPS and spontaneously elevated activity in the MPFC and the PCC were associated with impulsive responding in the SART. These results suggest that such a spontaneous transition of brain activity pattern results in impulsive responding in monotonous situations, which in turn, might cause human errors in actual work environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0067391

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High level of impulsivity is associated with decreased reactivity of both anterior and posterior DMN.

    “In another study, high level of impulsivity was associated with decreased reactivity of both anterior and posterior DMN12.”

    From Effects of l-theanine–caffeine combination on sustained attention and inhibitory control among children with ADHD: a proof-of-concept neuroimaging RCT (2020) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Abstract and Discussion (page numbers not provided) say that impulsive responding in the SART was associated with elevated, not decreased, activity in the medial prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex—regions the Discussion identifies as core DMN regions. The paper describes this association as statistically weak. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Impaired sustained attention and inhibitory control in patients with ADHD is associated with increased task-associated mind wandering.

    “Impaired sustained attention and inhibitory control in patients with ADHD is associated with increased task-associated mind wandering8–12.”

    From Effects of l-theanine–caffeine combination on sustained attention and inhibitory control among children with ADHD: a proof-of-concept neuroimaging RCT (2020) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that patients with difficulty sustaining attention made more NoGo errors than controls, which supports the attention and inhibitory-response portion of the claim. It does not link those patients’ performance to increased task-associated mind wandering. The study’s participants were healthy adults, as stated in Materials and Methods (page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [42]Ridderinkhof KR, de Vlugt Y, Bramlage A, Spaan M, Elton M, et al (2002) The role of the medial prefrontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 298: 2209– 2211. 12424384
  2. [45]Menon V, Adleman NE, White CD, Glover GH, Reiss AL (2001) Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Hum Brain Mapp 12: 131– 143. 11170305 PMC6872006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sakai, H., Uchiyama, Y., Shin, D., Hayashi, M. J., & Sadato, N.
Affiliations
  • Toyota Central Research and Development Laboratories (Japan) (JP)
  • Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • National Institute for Physiological Sciences (JP)
Corresponding author
Sakai, Hiroyuki
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-06-25
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
e67391
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037481633
Cited by
20
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Tokyo Tech Research Repository (Tokyo Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Helsingin Yliopisto
  • Aalto-Yliopisto
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21220005)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
impulsive responding, Sustained Attention to Response Task, reaction time, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, intraparietal sulcus, medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, brain activity modulation, human error, monotonous work
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Brain, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review