Cited by 89Algal biology and biofuel productionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBiofuel production and bioconversion

Effects of Escherichia coli on Mixotrophic Growth of Chlorella minutissima and Production of Biofuel Precursors

Open access
Higgins, Brendan T., VanderGheynst, Jean S.·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Chlorella minutissima was co-cultured with Escherichia coli in airlift reactors under mixotrophic conditions (glucose, glycerol, and acetate substrates) to determine possible effects of bacterial contamination on algal biofuel production. It was hypothesized that E. coli would compete with C. minutissima for nutrients, displacing algal biomass. However, C. minutissima grew more rapidly and to higher densities in the presence of E. coli, suggesting a symbiotic relationship between the organisms. At an initial 1% substrate concentration, the co-culture produced 200-587% more algal biomass than the axenic C. minutissima cultures. Co-cultures grown on 1% substrate consumed 23-737% more of the available carbon substrate than the sum of substrate consumed by E. coli and C. minutissima alone. At 1% substrate, total lipid and starch productivity were elevated in co-cultures compared to axenic cultures indicating that bacterial contamination was not detrimental to the production of biofuel precursors in this specific case. Bio-fouling of the reactors observed in co-cultures and acid formation in all mixotrophic cultures, however, could present challenges for scale-up.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0096807

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At 1% substrate concentration, the total starch productivity as well as lipid productivity increased in all the co-cultures compared to axenic conditions.

    “At 1% substrate concentration, the total starch productivity as well as lipid productivity increased in all the co-cultures compared to axenic conditions.”
  • Higgins and VanderGheynst reported significant increments in the starch produced by Chlorella minutissima when co-cultured with E. coli under mixotrophic conditions (glucose, glycerol, and acetate substrates).

    “Higgins and VanderGheynst [72] reported significant increments in the starch produced by Chlorella minutissima when co-cultured with E. coli under mixotrophic conditions (glucose, glycerol, and acetate substrates).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [42]Humenik FJ, Hanna Jr GP (1971) Algal-bacterial symbiosis for removal and conservation of wastewater nutrients. Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation): 580–594.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Higgins, B. T., & VanderGheynst, J. S.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
VanderGheynst, Jean S.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-05-07
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
e96807
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077651348
Cited by
89
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0948021, 1139644)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
Chlorella minutissima, Escherichia coli, mixotrophic cultivation, algal-bacterial co-culture, biofuel precursors, lipid productivity, bacterial contamination, airlift bioreactor, glycerol, acetate, glucose, reactor fouling, acid production, symbiosis
MeSH terms
Carbon, Chlorella, Culture Media, Escherichia coli, Glucose, Humans, Starch, Biomass, Coculture Techniques, Biofuels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review