The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Adolescents with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An Open Trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) as the first line treatment for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, a substantial proportion of patients do not have access to such treatment. We developed and tested the feasibility, efficacy and acceptability of a novel therapist-guided, Internet-delivered CBT (ICBT) platform for adolescents with OCD. METHODS: An interactive, age-appropriate ICBT platform ("BiP OCD") was developed. Twenty-one adolescents (12-17 years) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of OCD and their parents were enrolled in the study. All participants received 12 weeks of ICBT with therapist support. The primary outcome measure was the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS). Acceptability was assessed at post-treatment. RESULTS: Participants completed on average 8.29 (SD = 3.0) of the 12 treatment chapters. Treatment yielded significant improvements on all clinician-, parent- and most self-administered outcome measures, with a large effect size of d = 2.29 (95% CI 1.5-3.07) on the CY-BOCS. Patients continued to improve at follow-up. At 6-month follow-up, 71% were classified as responders (≥35% decrease on the CY-BOCS) and 76% as being in remission (CY-BOCS score ≤12). Average clinician support time was less than 20 minutes per patient per week. The majority of participants felt that BiP OCD was age-appropriate and rated the treatment as good or very good. CONCLUSIONS: ICBT could be efficacious, acceptable, and cost-effective for adolescents with OCD. More rigorously controlled studies are needed to further evaluate the treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01809990.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Adolescents and their parents generally expressed satisfaction with the intervention and the majority would recommend it to others, corresponding to what previous studies of similar interventions have found (Spence et al., 2011; Lenhard et al., 2014; Wuthrich et al., 2012).”
From Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for adolescents with anxiety disorders: A feasibility study (2018) · cites this paper as Lenhard et al., 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
(1998) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · Cited by 19,139
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note
Goodman, R. (1997) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x · Cited by 14,908
(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 10,216
(1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,899
The mini international neuropsychiatric interview
Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, D. V., Hergueta, T., & Weiller, E. (1998) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(99)80239-9 · Cited by 5,899
A Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)
Shaffer, D. (1983) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790100074010 · Cited by 3,716 · cited 1×
“Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS [36]) is an instrument to quantify the overall level of functioning in children and adolescents.”
BackgroundChildren's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: Reliability and Validity
SCAHILL, L., RIDDLE, M. A., McSWIGGIN-HARDIN, M., ORT, S. I., KING, R. A., GOODMAN, W. K., CICCHETTI, D., & LECKMAN, J. F. (1997) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199706000-00023 · Cited by 2,045
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vigerland, S., Lenhard, F., Bonnert, M., Lalouni, M., Hedman, E., Ahlen, J., Olén, O., Serlachius, E., & Ljótsson, B. (2016) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.09.005 · Cited by 292
“Four of the included studies were written by coauthors of this review (Bonnert et al., 2014; Lenhard et al., 2014; Vigerland et al., 2013; Vigerland et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationRemote cognitive-behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive symptoms: A meta-analysis.
Wootton, B. M. (2016) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.10.001 · Cited by 162
Obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents
Krebs, G., & Heyman, I. (2009) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-306934 · Cited by 304
Lenhard, F., Andersson, E., Mataix-Cols, D., Rück, C., Vigerland, S., Högström, J., Hillborg, M., Brander, G., Ljungström, M., Ljótsson, B., et al. (2017) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.515 · Cited by 146
Neuroscience-informed psychoeducation for addiction medicine: A neurocognitive perspective
Ekhtiari, H., Rezapour, T., Aupperle, R. L., & Paulus, M. P. (2017) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.013 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Lenhard, F., Vigerland, S., Andersson, E., Rück, C., Mataix-Cols, D., Thulin, U., Ljótsson, B., & Serlachius, E.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Lenhard, Fabian
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-06-20
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e100773
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4065049
- OpenAlex
- W2116170399
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 20.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Karolinska Institutet
- Stockholms Läns Landsting (20120167)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, obsessive-compulsive disorder, adolescents, pediatric OCD, treatment acceptability, treatment efficacy, treatment feasibility, Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, parental involvement
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Parents, Severity of Illness Index, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
