CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 421Child Abuse and TraumaChild Welfare and AdoptionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ‘Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure’ (MACE) Scale for the Retrospective Assessment of Abuse and Neglect During Development

Open access
Teicher, Martin H., Parigger, Angelika·2015·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0117423PMC PMC4340880
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

There is increasing interest in childhood maltreatment as a potent stimulus that may alter trajectories of brain development, induce epigenetic modifications and enhance risk for medical and psychiatric disorders. Although a number of useful scales exist for retrospective assessment of abuse and neglect they have significant limitations. Moreover, they fail to provide detailed information on timing of exposure, which is critical for delineation of sensitive periods. The Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure (MACE) scale was developed in a sample of 1051 participants using item response theory to gauge severity of exposure to ten types of maltreatment (emotional neglect, non-verbal emotional abuse, parental physical maltreatment, parental verbal abuse, peer emotional abuse, peer physical bullying, physical neglect, sexual abuse, witnessing interparental violence and witnessing violence to siblings) during each year of childhood. Items included in the subscales had acceptable psychometric properties based on infit and outfit mean square statistics, and each subscale passed Andersen's Likelihood ratio test. The MACE provides an overall severity score and multiplicity score (number of types of maltreatment experienced) with excellent test-retest reliability. Each type of maltreatment showed good reliability as did severity of exposure across each year of childhood. MACE Severity correlated 0.738 with Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) score and MACE Multiplicity correlated 0.698 with the Adverse Childhood Experiences scale (ACE). However, MACE accounted for 2.00- and 2.07-fold more of the variance, on average, in psychiatric symptom ratings than CTQ or ACE, respectively, based on variance decomposition. Different types of maltreatment had distinct and often unique developmental patterns. The 52-item MACE, a simpler Maltreatment Abuse and Exposure Scale (MAES) that only assesses overall exposure and the original test instrument (MACE-X) with several additional items plus spreadsheets and R code for scoring are provided to facilitate use and to spur further development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0117423

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. JM Linacre, 1994, Dichotomous Infit and Outfit Mean-Square Fit Statistics / Chi-Square Fit Statistics, Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 350

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 421

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Teicher, M. H., & Parigger, A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
Corresponding author
Teicher, Martin H.
ORCID
Teicher, Martin H.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2015-02-25
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
e0117423
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0117423
PMC
PMC4340880
OpenAlex
W2103710345
Cited by
421
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9
FWCI
29.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01mh091391-01, 5r01da017846-14)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH-091391, MH091391, R01 MH-, DA-017846)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA-017846, DA017846, MH-091391)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
child abuse, abuse and neglect, retrospective evaluation, exposure timing, sensitive period, emotional neglect, physical abuse, sexual abuse, bullying, witnessing violence, peer abuse, psychiatric symptoms, adverse childhood experiences, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, scale development, item response theory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Emotions, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Prevalence, Young Adult, Public Health Surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review