Cited by 15Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

Quantifying the Contribution of Statins to the Decline in Population Mean Cholesterol by Socioeconomic Group in England 1991 - 2012: A Modelling Study

Open access
Kypridemos, Chris, Bandosz, Piotr, Hickey, Graeme L., Guzman-Castillo, Maria, Allen, Kirk, Buchan, Iain, Capewell, Simon, O’Flaherty, Martin·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serum total cholesterol is one of the major targets for cardiovascular disease prevention. Statins are effective for cholesterol control in individual patients. At the population level, however, their contribution to total cholesterol decline remains unclear. The aim of this study was to quantify the contribution of statins to the observed fall in population mean cholesterol levels in England over the past two decades, and explore any differences between socioeconomic groups. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This is a modelling study based on data from the Health Survey for England. We analysed changes in observed mean total cholesterol levels in the adult England population between 1991-92 (baseline) and 2011-12. We then compared the observed changes with a counterfactual 'no statins' scenario, where the impact of statins on population total cholesterol was estimated and removed. We estimated uncertainty intervals (UI) using Monte Carlo simulation, where confidence intervals (CI) were impractical. In 2011-12, 13.2% (95% CI: 12.5-14.0%) of the English adult population used statins at least once per week, compared with 1991-92 when the proportion was just 0.5% (95% CI: 0.3-1.0%). Between 1991-92 and 2011-12, mean total cholesterol declined from 5.86 mmol/L (95% CI: 5.82-5.90) to 5.17 mmol/L (95% CI: 5.14-5.20). For 2011-12, mean total cholesterol was lower in more deprived groups. In our 'no statins' scenario we predicted a mean total cholesterol of 5.36 mmol/L (95% CI: 5.33-5.40) for 2011-12. Statins were responsible for approximately 33.7% (95% UI: 28.9-38.8%) of the total cholesterol reduction since 1991-92. The statin contribution to cholesterol reduction was greater among the more deprived groups of women, while showing little socio-economic gradient among men. CONCLUSIONS: Our model suggests that statins explained around a third of the substantial falls in total cholesterol observed in England since 1991. Approximately two thirds of the cholesterol decrease can reasonably be attributed non-pharmacological determinants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0123112

Cites

59 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In certain Western nations, statin use may account for a large proportion of declining blood cholesterol after 2000; however, due to relatively low use for primary prevention prior to this period, statins cannot explain the observed similar declines in blood cholesterol over the preceding 20-30 years.

    “In certain Western nations, statin use may account for a large proportion of declining blood cholesterol after 2000;347, 348 however, due to relatively low use for primary prevention prior to this period, statins cannot explain the observed similar declines in blood cholesterol over the preceding 20-30 years.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kypridemos, C., Bandosz, P., Hickey, G. L., Guzman-Castillo, M., Allen, K., Buchan, I., Capewell, S., & O’Flaherty, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Kypridemos, Chris
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-04-09
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
e0123112
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088162558
Cited by
15
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K006665/1, MC_PC_13042)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
statins, socioeconomic disparities, socioeconomic deprivation, counterfactual modeling, cardiovascular disease prevention, statin use, women, England, Health Survey for England, uncertainty intervals, Monte Carlo simulation, cardiovascular risk reduction, health disparities, health policy evaluation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monte Carlo Method, Social Class, Confidence Intervals, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review