CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection of Cytosine Methylation in Ancient DNA from Five Native American Populations Using Bisulfite Sequencing

Smith, Rick W. A., Monroe, Cara, Bolnick, Deborah A.·2015·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0125344PMC PMC4445908
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0125344

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bisulfite conversion is also extremely harmful to DNA and, thus, generally not recommended for aDNA, despite a few successes on limited numbers of samples.

    “However, bisulfite conversion is also extremely harmful to DNA and, thus, generally not recommended for aDNA, despite a few successes on limited numbers of samples 244,245 .”

    From Ancient DNA analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [245]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says sodium bisulfite can reduce viable DNA molecules by 90% or more, supporting the claim that conversion is harmful to aDNA. But the paper reports successful methylation recovery in large numbers of ancient remains, and its Conclusions say bisulfite sequencing may be useful for well-preserved aDNA; it does not generally advise against the method or characterize its successes as limited to a few samples. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. J Attwood, 2002, DNA methylation and the regulation of gene transcription, Cell Mol. Life Sci, 59, 241, 10.1007/s00018-002-8420-z · DOI
  2. R Jaenisch, 2003, Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals, Nat. Genet, 33, 245, 10.1038/ng1089 · DOI · Paper page
  3. A Portela, 2010, Epigenetic modifications and human disease, Nat. Biotechnol, 28, 1057, 10.1038/nbt.1685 · DOI
  4. J Sved, 2002, The expected equilibrium of the CpG dinucleotide in vertebrate genomes under a mutation model, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 87, 4692, 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4692 · DOI
  5. M Gama-Sosa, 1983, Tissue-specific differences in DNA methylation in various mammals, Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 740, 212
  6. T Bestor, 1998, The host defense function of genomic methylation patterns, Novartis Found. Symp, 214, 187
  7. AW Briggs, 2010, Removal of deaminated cytosines and detection of in vivo methylation in ancient DNA, Nucleic Acids Res, 38, 1, 10.1093/nar/gkp1163 · DOI · Paper page
  8. D Gokhman, 2014, Reconstructing the DNA methylation maps of the Neandertal and the Denisovan, Science, 344, 523, 10.1126/science.1250368 · DOI · Paper page
  9. J Pedersen, 2014, Genome-wide nucleosome map and cytosine methylation levels of an ancient human genome, Genome Res, 24, 454, 10.1101/gr.163592.113 · DOI · Paper page
  10. A Grand, 2014, Deamination features of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, a radical and enzymatic DNA oxidation product, J Mol Model, 20, 1
  11. C Nestor, 2011, Tissue type is a major modifier of the 5-hydroxymethylcytosine content of human genes, Genome Res, 22, 467, 10.1101/gr.126417.111 · DOI
  12. A Rusov, 2011, Lineage-specific distribution of high levels of genomic 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian development, Cell Res, 21, 1332, 10.1038/cr.2011.113 · DOI
  13. V Rusmintratip, 2000, An unexpectedly high excision capacity for mispaired 5-hydroxymethyluracil in human cell extracts, PNAS, 97, 14183, 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14183 · DOI
  14. B Llamas, 2012, High-resolution analysis of cytosine methylation in ancient DNA, PLoS One, 7, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0030226 · DOI · Paper page
  15. O Smith, 2014, Genomic methylation patterns in archaeological barley show de-methylation as a time-dependent diagenetic process, Sci. Rep, 4, 1
  16. J Yoder, 1997, Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites, Trends Genet, 13, 335, 10.1016/S0168-9525(97)01181-5 · DOI · Paper page
  17. H Kazazian, 1998, The impact of L1 retrotransposons on the human genome, Nat. Genet, 19, 19, 10.1038/ng0598-19 · DOI
  18. S Boissinot, 2000, L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon evolution and amplification in recent human history, Mol. Biol. Evol, 17, 915, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026372 · DOI
  19. F Sheen, 2000, Reading between the LINEs: Human genomic variation induced by LINE-1 retrotransposition, Genome Res, 10, 1496, 10.1101/gr.149400 · DOI
  20. J Myers, 2002, A comprehensive analysis of recently integrated human Ta L1 elements, Am. J. Hum. Genet, 71, 312, 10.1086/341718 · DOI
  21. E Willerslev, 2005, Ancient DNA, Proc. Royal Soc. Biol. Sci, 272, 3, 10.1098/rspb.2004.2813 · DOI · Paper page
  22. D Bolnick, 2007, Migration and social structure among the Hopewell: Evidence from ancient DNA, Am Antiq, 72, 627, 10.2307/25470437 · DOI
  23. J Mata-Míguez, 2012, The genetic impact of Aztec imperialism: Ancient mitochondrial DNA evidence from Xaltocan, Mexico, Am. J. Phys. Anth, 149, 504, 10.1002/ajpa.22152 · DOI
  24. F Villanea, 2013, Brief communication: Evolution of a specific O allele (O1v(G542A)) supports unique ancestry of Native Americans, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol, 151, 649, 10.1002/ajpa.22292 · DOI
  25. N Rohland, 2007, Ancient DNA extraction from bones and teeth, Nat. Prot, 2, 1756, 10.1038/nprot.2007.247 · DOI
  26. S Hummel, 2002, ABO blood group genotyping of ancient DNA by PCR-RFLP, Int. J. Legal Med, 116, 327, 10.1007/s00414-002-0315-x · DOI
  27. BM Kemp, 2006, Repeat silica extraction: A simple technique for the removal of PCR inhibitors from DNA extracts, J Arch. Sci, 33, 1680, 10.1016/j.jas.2006.02.015 · DOI
  28. C King, 2009, A quantitative approach to detect and overcome PCR inhibition in ancient DNA extracts, BioTechniques, 47, 941, 10.2144/000113244 · DOI
  29. C Schwarz, 2009, New insights from old bones: DNA preservation and degradation in permafrost preserved mammoth remains, Nuc. Ac. Res, 37, 3215, 10.1093/nar/gkp159 · DOI
  30. G Rakotoarisoa, 2006, Characterization of 13 microsatellite marker loci in Verreaux’s sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi), Mol. Eco. Notes, 6, 1122, 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01458.x · DOI
  31. F Kaestle, 2002, Ancient DNA in Anthropology: methods, applications, and ethics, Yearb. Phys. Anthropol, 45, 92, 10.1002/ajpa.10179 · DOI
  32. S Paabo, 2004, Genetic analyses from ancient DNA, Annu. Rev. Genet, 38, 645, 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143214 · DOI · Paper page
  33. MTP Gilbert, 2005, Assessing ancient DNA studies, Trends Ecol. Evol, 20, 541, 10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  34. B Shapiro, 2012, Ancient DNA: Methods and protocols, 10.1007/978-1-61779-516-9 · DOI
  35. C Grunau, 2001, Bisulfite genomic sequencing: systematic investigation of critical experimental parameters, Nucleic Acids Res, 29, 1, 10.1093/nar/29.13.e65 · DOI
  36. J Burger, 1999, DNA preservation: A microsatellite-DNA study on ancient skeletal remains, Electrophoresis, 20, 1722, 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990101)20:8<1722::AID-ELPS1722>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
  37. CJ Adler, 2011, Survival and recovery of DNA from ancient teeth and bones, J. Archaeol. Sci, 38, 956, 10.1016/j.jas.2010.11.010 · DOI
  38. ME Allentoft, 2012, The half-life of DNA in bone: measuring decay kinetics in 158 dated fossils, Proc. B, 279, 4724
  39. P Campos, 2012, DNA in ancient bone—Where is it located and how should we extract it?, Ann. Anat, 194, 7, 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.07.003 · DOI
  40. F Zhang, 2011, Dietary patterns are associated with levels of global genomic DNA methylation in a cancer-free population, J. Nutr, 141, 1165, 10.3945/jn.110.134536 · DOI
  41. AW Briggs, 2007, Patterns of damage in genomic DNA sequences from a Neandertal, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 104, 14616, 10.1073/pnas.0704665104 · DOI · Paper page
  42. L Orlando, 2014, An epigenetic window into the past?, Science, 345, 511, 10.1126/science.1256515 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Smith, R. W. A., Monroe, C., & Bolnick, D. A.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2015-05-27
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
e0125344
ISSN
1932-6203
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0125344
PMC
PMC4445908
Cited by
43
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review