Cited by 68Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeLiver Diseases and Immunity

Cost-effectiveness analysis: risk stratification of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by the primary care physician using the NAFLD fibrosis score

Open access
Tapper, Elliot B., Hunink, M. G. Myriam, Afdhal, Nezam H., Lai, Michelle, Sengupta, Neil·2016·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The complications of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) are dependent on the presence of advanced fibrosis. Given the high prevalence of NAFLD in the US, the optimal evaluation of NAFLD likely involves triage by a primary care physician (PCP) with advanced disease managed by gastroenterologists. METHODS: We compared the cost-effectiveness of fibrosis risk-assessment strategies in a cohort of 10,000 simulated American patients with NAFLD performed in either PCP or referral clinics using a decision analytical microsimulation state-transition model. The strategies included use of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), combination testing with NFS and VCTE, and liver biopsy (usual care by a specialist only). NFS and VCTE performance was obtained from a prospective cohort of 164 patients with NAFLD. Outcomes included cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) and correct classification of fibrosis. RESULTS: Risk-stratification by the PCP using the NFS alone costs $5,985 per QALY while usual care costs $7,229/QALY. In the microsimulation, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000, the NFS alone in PCP clinic was the most cost-effective strategy in 94.2% of samples, followed by combination NFS/VCTE in the PCP clinic (5.6%) and usual care in 0.2%. The NFS based strategies yield the best biopsy-correct classification ratios (3.5) while the NFS/VCTE and usual care strategies yield more correct-classifications of advanced fibrosis at the cost of 3 and 37 additional biopsies per classification. CONCLUSION: Risk-stratification of patients with NAFLD primary care clinic is a cost-effective strategy that should be formally explored in clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0147237

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study modelling the primary care setting suggests that screening with the NAFLD fibrosis score is not cost-effective.

    “However, one study modelling the primary care setting suggests that screening with the NAFLD fi brosis score (NFS) is not cost-effective.”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [133]

    The Abstract Results report that, among simulated patients with NAFLD, NFS alone in primary care was the most cost-effective strategy in 94.2% of samples. The Discussion likewise calls PCP use of NFS alone the most cost-effective strategy. The model assessed fibrosis risk-stratification in patients with NAFLD, rather than population-wide NAFLD screening. (LLM, conf=0.95)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tapper, E. B., Hunink, M. G. M., Afdhal, N. H., Lai, M., & Sengupta, N.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Tapper, Elliot B.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2016-02-23
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
e0147237
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2293460727
Cited by
68
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Knowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Chicago (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000430)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, NAFLD fibrosis score, vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver biopsy, primary care triage, cost-effectiveness, quality-adjusted life years
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Middle Aged, Referral and Consultation, Risk Assessment, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Physicians, Primary Care, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review