Cited by 85Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchOccupational Health and PerformanceResilience and Mental Health

The Primary Prevention of PTSD in Firefighters: Preliminary Results of an RCT with 12-Month Follow-Up

Open access
Skeffington, Petra M., Rees, Clare S., Mazzucchelli, Trevor G., Kane, Robert T.·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

AIM: To develop and evaluate an evidence-based and theory driven program for the primary prevention of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). DESIGN: A pre-intervention / post-intervention / follow up control group design with clustered random allocation of participants to groups was used. The "control" group received "Training as Usual" (TAU). METHOD: Participants were 45 career recruits within the recruit school at the Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES) in Western Australia. The intervention group received a four-hour resilience training intervention (Mental Agility and Psychological Strength training) as part of their recruit training school curriculum. Data was collected at baseline and at 6- and 12-months post intervention. RESULTS: We found no evidence that the intervention was effective in the primary prevention of mental health issues, nor did we find any significant impact of MAPS training on social support or coping strategies. A significant difference across conditions in trauma knowledge is indicative of some impact of the MAPS program. CONCLUSION: While the key hypotheses were not supported, this study is the first randomised control trial investigating the primary prevention of PTSD. Practical barriers around the implementation of this program, including constraints within the recruit school, may inform the design and implementation of similar programs in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12615001362583.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0155873

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other intervention-based studies exist but are not specific to full-time firefighters but rather recruit firefighters or first responders.

    “Other intervention-based studies do exist; however, they are not specific to full-time firefighters but rather recruit firefighters (individuals employed by fire departments prior to becoming a full-time firefighter) or first responders (police, firefighters, EMS) [124,125,126].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [34]Orsillo SM (2001) Measures for Acute Stress Disorder and PTSD In: Antony MM, Orsillo SM, Roemer L, editors. Practitioner's Guide to Epirically Based Measures of Anxiety. New York: Kluwer Academic pp. 255– 308.
  2. [43]Harrop E, Addis S, Elliot E, Williams G (2006) Resilience, coping and salutogenic approaches to maintaining and generating health: A review. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
  3. [55]Stephens C, Miller I (1998) Traumatic experiences and PTSD in the New Zealand Police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 21: 178– 191.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skeffington, P. M., Rees, C. S., Mazzucchelli, T. G., & Kane, R. T.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Skeffington, Petra M.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-07-06
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
e0155873
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2461752678
Cited by
84
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, primary prevention, firefighters, resilience training, recruit training, trauma knowledge, social support, coping strategies, workplace mental health, fire and emergency services
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Primary Prevention, Research Design, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Western Australia, Cluster Analysis, Evidence-Based Medicine, Firefighters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review