Cited by 505Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Research Topics

When are adaptive strategies most predictive of psychopathology?

Aldao, Amelia, Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan·2012·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

In recent work, we showed that putatively adaptive emotion regulation strategies, such as reappraisal and acceptance, have a weaker association with psychopathology than putatively maladaptive strategies, such as rumination, suppression, and avoidance (e.g., Aldao & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2010; Aldao, Nolen-Hoeksema, & Schweizer, 2010). In this investigation, we examined the interaction between adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies in the prediction of psychopathology symptoms (depression, anxiety, and alcohol problems) concurrently and prospectively. We assessed trait emotion regulation and psychopathology symptoms in a sample of community residents at Time 1 (N = 1,317) and then reassessed psychopathology at Time 2 (N = 1,132). Cross-sectionally, we found that the relationship between adaptive strategies and psychopathology symptoms was moderated by levels of maladaptive strategies: adaptive strategies had a negative association with psychopathology symptoms only at high levels of maladaptive strategies. In contrast, adaptive strategies showed no prospective relationship to psychopathology symptoms either alone or in interaction with maladaptive strategies. We discuss the implications of this investigation for future work on the contextual factors surrounding the deployment of emotion regulation strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0023598

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aldao, A., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2012-02
Volume
121
Issue
1
Pages
276-281
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2169892062
Cited by
505
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 8
FWCI
23.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
emotion regulation strategies, adaptive emotion regulation, maladaptive emotion regulation, psychopathology, depression, anxiety, alcohol problems, rumination, suppression, avoidance, acceptance, cognitive reappraisal, moderation, prospective prediction
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, California, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review