Cited by 53Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Exploring the relationship between experiential avoidance, coping functions and the recency and frequency of self-harm.

Open access
Nielsen, Emma, Sayal, Kapil, Townsend, Ellen·2016·PLoS ONE

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between experiential avoidance, coping and the recency and frequency of self-harm, in a community sample (N = 1332, aged 16-69 years). Participants completed online, self-report measures assessing self-harm, momentary affect, experiential avoidance and coping in response to a recent stressor. Participants who had self-harmed reported significantly higher levels of experiential avoidance and avoidance coping, as well as lower levels of approach, reappraisal and emotional regulation coping, than those with no self-harm history. Moreover, more recent self-harm was associated with lower endorsement of approach, reappraisal and emotion regulation coping, and also higher levels of both avoidance coping and experiential avoidance. Higher experiential avoidance and avoidance coping also predicted increased lifetime frequency of self-harm. Conversely, increased approach and reappraisal coping were associated with a decreased likelihood of high frequency self-harm. Although some of the effects were small, particularly in relation to lifetime frequency of self-harm, overall our results suggest that experiential avoidance tendency may be an important psychological factor underpinning self-harm, regardless of suicidal intent (e.g. including mixed intent, suicidal intent, ambivalence), which is not accounted for in existing models of self-harm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0159854

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nielsen, E., Sayal, K., & Townsend, E.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Nielsen, Emma
  • Sayal, Kapil
  • Townsend, Ellen
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2016-07-21
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
e0159854
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2476732416
Cited by
53
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/J500100/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
self-harm, experiential avoidance, coping, avoidance coping, approach coping, cognitive reappraisal, emotion regulation, suicidal intent, ambivalence, stress response
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Avoidance Learning, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Injurious Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review