Cited by 58Mental Health Treatment and AccessDigital Mental Health InterventionsICT in Developing Communities

The Systematic Medical Appraisal, Referral and Treatment (SMART) Mental Health Project: development and testing of electronic decision support system and formative research to understand perceptions about mental health in rural India

Open access
Maulik, Pallab K, Tewari, Abha, Devarapalli, Siddhardha, Kallakuri, Sudha, Patel, Anushka·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Common mental disorders (CMD) such as depression, suicidal risk and emotional/medically unexplained complaints affect a large number of people in India, but few receive appropriate care. Key reasons for this include few trained mental health professionals and stigma associated with mental health. A potential approach to address poor access to care is by training village healthcare workers in providing basic mental health care, and harnessing India's vast mobile network to support such workers using mobile-based applications. We propose an intervention to implement such an approach that incorporates the use of mobile-based electronic decision support systems (EDSS) to provide mental health services for CMD, combined with a community-based anti-stigma campaign. This will be implemented and evaluated across 42 villages in Andhra Pradesh, a south Indian state. This paper discusses the development and testing of the EDSS, and the formative research that informed the anti-stigma campaign. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The development of the EDSS used an iterative process that was validated against clinical diagnosis. A mixed methods approach tested the user acceptability of the EDSS. Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews provided community-level perceptions about mental health. This study involved 3 villages and one primary health centre. RESULTS: The EDSS application was found to be acceptable, but some modifications were needed. The community lacked adequate knowledge about CMD and its treatment and there was stigma associated with mental illness. Faith and traditional healers were considered to be important mental health service providers. DISCUSSION: A number of barriers and facilitators were identified in implementing the intervention analysed in a framework using Andersen's behavioural model of health services use. CONCLUSION: The findings assisted with refining the intervention prior to large-scale implementation and evaluation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0164404

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maulik, P. K., Tewari, A., Devarapalli, S., Kallakuri, S., & Patel, A.
Affiliations
  • The George Institute for Global Health (GB)
  • George Institute for Global Health (IN)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Maulik, Pallab K
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-10-12
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
e0164404
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2530046471
Cited by
58
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust/Department of Biotechnology India Alliance Fellowship (IA/I/13/1/500879)
  • Grand Challenges Canada (0524-01-10)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
decision support system, common mental disorders, mental health stigma, mobile health, community mental health services, anti-stigma campaigns, user acceptance, faith healers, Andersen Behavioral Model, rural mental health services, Andhra Pradesh
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Community Health Workers, Culture, Female, Humans, India, Male, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Residence Characteristics, Rural Population, Focus Groups, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Young Adult, Social Stigma, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review