Cited by 125Mental Health Treatment and AccessDigital Mental Health InterventionsICT in Developing Communities

Increasing use of mental health services in remote areas using mobile technology: a pre-post evaluation of the SMART Mental Health project in rural India

Open access
Maulik, Pallab K, Kallakuri, Sudha, Devarapalli, Siddhardha, Vadlamani, Vamsi Krishna, Jha, Vivekanand, Patel, Anushka·2017·Journal of Global Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: About 25% of the Indian population experience common mental disorders (CMD) but only 15-25% of them receive any mental health care. Stigma, lack of adequate mental health professionals and mental health services account for this treatment gap, which is worse in rural areas. Our project evaluated task shifting and mobile-technology based electronic decision support systems to enhance the ability of primary care health workers to provide evidence-based mental health care for stress, depression, and suicidal risk in 30 remote villages in the state of Andhra Pradesh, India. METHODS: The Systematic Medical Appraisal Referral and Treatment (SMART) Mental Health project between May 2014 and April 2016 trained lay village health workers (Accredited Social Health Activists - ASHAs) and primary care doctors to screen, diagnose and manage individuals with common mental disorders using an electronic decision support system. An anti-stigma campaign using multi-media approaches was conducted across the villages at the outset of the project. A pre-post evaluation using mixed methods assessed the change in mental health service utilization by screen positive individuals. This paper reports on the quantitative aspects of that evaluation. RESULTS: Training was imparted to 21 ASHAs and 2 primary care doctors. 5007 of 5167 eligible individuals were screened, and 238 were identified as being positive for common mental disorders and referred to the primary care doctors for further management. Out of them, 2 (0.8%) had previously utilized mental health services. During the intervention period, 30 (12.6%) visited the primary care doctor for further diagnosis and treatment, as advised. There was a significant reduction in the depression and anxiety scores between start and end of the intervention among those who had screened positive at the beginning. Stigma and mental health awareness in the broader community improved during the project. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention led to individuals being screened for common mental disorders by village health workers and increase in mental health service use by those referred to the primary care doctor. The model was deemed feasible and acceptable. The effectiveness of the intervention needs to be demonstrated using more robust randomized controlled trials, while addressing the issues identified that will facilitate scale up.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7189/jogh.07.010408

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maulik, P. K., Kallakuri, S., Devarapalli, S., Vadlamani, V. K., Jha, V., & Patel, A.
Affiliations
  • The George Institute for Global Health (GB)
  • George Institute for Global Health (IN)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Maulik, Pallab K
Venue
Journal of Global Health
Published
2017-03-18
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
010408-010408
ISSN
  • 2047-2978 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-2986
OpenAlex
W2603376457
Cited by
125
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
mental health service utilization, common mental disorders, task shifting, electronic decision support, mobile health, Accredited Social Health Activists, primary care, mental health screening, mental health stigma, anti-stigma campaigns, depression, anxiety, suicide risk, rural India, Andhra Pradesh
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Awareness, Mental Disorders, Community Health Workers, Depression, Female, Humans, India, Male, Mass Screening, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Rural Population, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Social Stigma, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review