Cited by 24Social Media in Health EducationImpact of Technology on AdolescentsDental Education, Practice, Research

The relationship between Facebook behaviour and e‐professionalism: A questionnaire‐based cross‐sectional study among Greek dental students

Karveleas, Ilias, Kyriakouli, Athina, Koukou, Melina, Koufatzidou, Marianna, Kalogirou, Eleni‐Marina, Tosios, Konstantinos I.·2021·European Journal of Dental Education

Abstract

Introduction: The social media attitude of health science students might affect patients' opinion about the health profession and have negative impact on e‐professionalism. The aim of this study is to investigate the behaviour of Greek dental students on Facebook, focusing on potentially unprofessional posts and the online student‐patient relationship. Materials and methods: Five hundred and twelve dental students in Greece answered an anonymous, 23‐item questionnaire including multiple‐choice questions about various topics, including Facebook profile settings and content shared by dental students, student‐patient relationship via Facebook; and students' perception about the impact of their online behaviour. Results: 93.2% of responders had a Facebook profile and 80.5% admitted that their online attitude might affect patients' opinion about dental profession. However, 71.7% posted pictures from holidays, 41.5% from nightclubs, and 26.2% photographs wearing swimwear/underwear, while 12.8% expressed online political party predilection. One quarter of students in clinical years were Facebook friends with patients and 58% and 30% of them had online discussion about topics related or not to dentistry, respectively, while 6.8% of dental students had posted defamatory comments about the dental school, faculty members or academic staff on Facebook. Discussion: In accordance with studies in other countries, most Greek dental students had a Facebook profile and, although the majority realised the impact of Facebook behaviour on e‐professionalism, a considerable percentage posted unprofessional content. Conclusion: Dental students might fall into pitfalls when it comes to e‐professionalism. As social media are becoming an integral part of life, there is need to include e‐professionalism in dental education curriculum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eje.12585

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies found high social media use among students, ranging from 66.9% to 98.7%.

    “Studies that assessed SM use among different types of HCPs found high use among students, from 66.9% to 98.7% [40,43,50,51,60,61,64-66,68-70,102]”
  • Only 4 studies explicitly stated the percentage of students who had set their Facebook account on private: 37% of pharmacy students, 83.6% and 91% of dental students, and 71% of medical students.

    “Only 4 studies explicitly stated the percentage of students who had set their Facebook account on private: 37% of pharmacy students [40], 83.6% and 91% of dental students [64,65], and 71% of medical students [42].”
  • Loosening accountability is a danger to e-professionalism from two points of view: eroding public trust by providing poor quality of information on social media and damaging the professional image.

    “According to some studies in this review, loosening accountability can be seen as a danger to e-professionalism from two points of view: eroding public trust by providing poor quality of information on SM [39,106,117] and damaging to the professional image [43, 45, 51, 56, 57, 59, 64, 66, 68, 70, 73, 102, 106, 112].”
  • Numerous studies document blurred boundaries between patients and health care professionals, and between students and faculty.

    “Numerous studies document blurred boundaries between patient and HCPs, and between students and faculty [40, 43, 47, 59, 64, 65, 68, 70, 73, 75, 78, 82, 85, 98, 100, 105, 107, 114, 117].”
  • 5.5% of dental students had published smoking.

    “Alcohol consumption and smoking were published by 19.1% and 5.5% of responders, respectively, while 0.4% of responders admitted having posted photographs of themselves using illegal drugs [64].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karveleas, I., Kyriakouli, A., Koukou, M., Koufatzidou, M., Kalogirou, E., & Tosios, K. I.
Affiliations
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Kalogirou, Eleni‐Marina
Venue
European Journal of Dental Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-08
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
151-158
ISSN
  • 1396-5883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0579
OpenAlex
W3048554027
Cited by
24
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal Of Dental Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
Keywords
e-professionalism, Facebook, dental students, social media use, online professional conduct, student-patient relationship, dental curriculum
MeSH terms
Professionalism, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Dental, Greece, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Dental, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review