The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated
Open accessAbstract
It is widely known that individuals have a tendency to imitate each other. However, different psychological disciplines assess imitation in different manners. While social psychologists assess mimicry by means of action observation, cognitive psychologists assess automatic imitation with reaction time based measures on a trial-by-trial basis. Although these methods differ in crucial methodological aspects, both phenomena are assumed to rely on similar underlying mechanisms. This raises the fundamental question whether mimicry and automatic imitation are actually correlated. In the present research we assessed both phenomena and did not find a meaningful correlation. Moreover, personality traits such as empathy, autism traits, and traits related to self- versus other-focus did not correlate with mimicry or automatic imitation either. Theoretical implications are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“More recent work also showed a greater interference effect for female individuals compared with male individuals (Genschow et al., 2017), as well as greater error rates for predominantly female samples than male samples (Cracco et al., 2018).”
From Functional Specificity and Sex Differences in the Neural Circuits Supporting the Inhibition of Automatic Imitation (2018) · cites this paper as Genschow et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This result extends prior behavioral research on sex differences, which did not separate spatial (or orthogonal spatial) from imitative responses in imitation control (Genschow et al., 2017;Butler et al., 2015).”
From Functional Specificity and Sex Differences in the Neural Circuits Supporting the Inhibition of Automatic Imitation (2018) · cites this paper as Genschow et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Indeed, it is well-established in the literature that automatic imitation comprises both a facilitation and an interference effect (Brass et al., 2000;Cracco et al., 2015;Genschow et al., 2017).”
From Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model (2019) · cites this paper as Genschow et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Given that such a balance is well-grounded in the literature (Brass et al., 2000;Cracco et al., 2015;Genschow et al., 2017), this indicates that the model is robust under realistic circumstances.”
From Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model (2019) · cites this paper as Genschow et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, more recent behavioural evidence suggests that imitation may not vary as a function of autistic-like traits or empathy, thus questioning the reliance of imitation inhibition on a distinctly social mechanism (Butler et al., 2015;Cracco et al., 2018;Genschow et al., 2017).”
From The inhibition of automatic imitation: a meta-analysis and synthesis of fMRI studies (2018) · cites this paper as Genschow et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The imitation task used by Genschow and colleagues (2017) was controlled for left-right spatial compatibility by presenting the stimulus hand orthogonal to the response.”
From Functional Specificity and Sex Differences in the Neural Circuits Supporting the Inhibition of Automatic Imitation (2018) · cites this paper as Genschow et al., 2017
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Thus, in line with Simulation 2, these findings suggests that the model is robust under realistic circumstances (Brass et al., 2000;Cracco et al., 2015;Genschow et al., 2017).”
From Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model (2019) · cites this paper as Genschow et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“However, even though empathy has been associated with different types of imitation paradigms (Müller, Leeuwen, Baaren, Bekkering, & Dijksterhuis, 2013;Sonnby-Borgström, Jönsson, & Svensson, 2003;Sonnby-Borgström, 2002;Chartrand & Bargh, 1999), the evidence to date suggests that there is no link between imitation, as measured by RTs, and empathy (Genschow et al., 2017;Butler et al., 2015).”
From Functional Specificity and Sex Differences in the Neural Circuits Supporting the Inhibition of Automatic Imitation (2018) · cites this paper as Genschow et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
(1983) · Cited by 33,192
Jeffreys, H., Moran, P. A. P., & Chatfield, C. (1922) · Nature · doi:10.1038/109132a0 · Cited by 7,877
Higgins, E. T. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.12.1280 · Cited by 6,775
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1005653411471 · Cited by 6,450
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Brewer, M. B. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 · Cited by 5,107
Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory
Crocker, L. M., & Algina, J. J. (1986) · Cited by 5,090
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,712
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Rosner, B., & Cronbach, L. J. (1960) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419921 · Cited by 4,524
The chameleon effect: the perception–behavior link and social interaction
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 · Cited by 3,674
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- N Gueguen, 2009, The effects of incidental similarity between two individuals on mimicry behavior, PSYCHOLOGIE FRANCAISE, 54, 337
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human-Robot Interaction: An Introduction
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108676649 · Cited by 211
Automatic imitation: A meta-analysis.
Cracco, E., Bardi, L., Desmet, C., Genschow, O., Rigoni, D., De Coster, L., Radkova, I., Deschrijver, E., & Brass, M. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000143 · Cited by 228
The neuroethology of spontaneous mimicry and emotional contagion in human and non-human animals
Palagi, E., Celeghin, A., Tamietto, M., Winkielman, P., & Norscia, I. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.020 · Cited by 192
Automatic imitation of pro- and antisocial gestures: Is implicit social behavior censored?
Cracco, E., Genschow, O., Radkova, I., & Braß, M. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.019 · Cited by 65
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676649.006 · Cited by 61
What are reaction time indices of automatic imitation measuring?
Ramsey, R. (2018) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.08.006 · Cited by 51
Rauchbauer, B., & Grosbras, M. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.032 · Cited by 47
Interpersonal Coordination in Schizophrenia: A Scoping Review of the Literature
Dean, D. J., Scott, J., & Park, S. (2021) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbab072 · Cited by 46
Bridging the gap between emotion and joint action
Bieńkiewicz, M. M. N., Smykovskyi, A., Olugbade, T., Janaqi, S., Camurri, A., Bianchi‐Berthouze, N., Björkman, M., & Bardy, B. G. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.08.014 · Cited by 50
Transfer learning in robotics: An upcoming breakthrough? A review of promises and challenges
Jaquier, N., Welle, M. C., Gams, A., Yao, K., Fichera, B., Billard, A., Ude, A., Asfour, T., & Kragić, D. (2024) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/02783649241273565 · Cited by 51
Reaction time indices of automatic imitation measure imitative response tendencies
Cracco, E., & Brass, M. (2019) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.001 · Cited by 45
You ≠ me: individual differences in the structure of social cognition
Shaw, D. J., Czekóová, K., Pennington, C. R., Qureshi, A., Špiláková, B., Salazar, M., Brázdil, M., & Urbánek, T. (2018) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3 · Cited by 43
Darda, K. M., Butler, E. E., & Ramsey, R. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01261 · Cited by 31
“More recent work also showed a greater interference effect for female individuals compared with male individuals (Genschow et al., 2017), as well as greater error rates for predominantly female samples than male samples (Cracco et al., 2018).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRaffard, S., Salesse, R. N., Bortolon, C., Bardy, B. G., Henriques, J., Marín, L., Stricker, D., & Capdevielle, D. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35813-6 · Cited by 30
Group membership does not modulate automatic imitation
Genschow, O., Westfal, M., Cracco, E., & Crusius, J. (2021) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-021-01526-1 · Cited by 26
The Effect of Money Priming on Self-Focus in the Imitation-Inhibition Task
Genschow, O., Schuler, J., Cracco, E., Braß, M., & Wänke, M. (2019) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000466 · Cited by 28
Individual differences in social and non-social cognitive control
Darda, K. M., Butler, E. E., & Ramsey, R. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104317 · Cited by 26
Social group membership does not modulate automatic imitation in a contrastive multi-agent paradigm
Souter, L. D., Braem, S., Genschow, O., Braß, M., & Cracco, E. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021820986528 · Cited by 22
Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model
Cracco, E., & Cooper, R. P. (2019) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101224 · Cited by 19
Mimicking and anticipating others’ actions is linked to Social Information Processing
Genschow, O., Klomfar, S., d’Haene, I., & Braß, M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193743 · Cited by 28
Genschow, O., Westfal, M., Crusius, J., Bartosch, L., Feikes, K. I., Pallasch, N., & Wozniak, M. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000261 · Cited by 24
Czekóová, K., Shaw, D. J., Saxunová, K., Dufek, M., Mareček, R., Vaníček, J., & Brázdil, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00525 · Cited by 22
Evidence for a two-step model of social group influence
Cracco, E., Bernardet, U., Sevenhant, R., Vandenhouwe, N., Copman, F., Durnez, W., Bombeke, K., & Braß, M. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104891 · Cited by 19
Automatic imitation does not predict levels of prosocial behaviour in a modified dictator game
Galang, C. M., & Obhi, S. S. (2020) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103022 · Cited by 16
Genschow, O., Cracco, E., Verbeke, P., Westfal, M., & Crusius, J. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824 · Cited by 13
Motor simulation is disturbed when experiencing pain
Cracco, E., Clauwaert, A., den Broeck, Y. V., Damme, S. V., & Braß, M. (2019) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001665 · Cited by 12
Du, B., Zhang, W., Chen, L., Deng, X., Li, K., Lin, F., Jia, F., Su, S., & Tang, W. (2024) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.3205 · Cited by 14
Anticipation in sociomotor actions: Similar effects for in- and outgroup interactions.
Weller, L., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2020) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103087 · Cited by 9
Being mimicked affects inhibitory mechanisms of imitation
Rauchbauer, B., Dunbar, R., & Lamm, C. (2020) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103132 · Cited by 16
Imagining is Not Observing: The Role of Simulation Processes Within the Mimicry-Liking Expressway
Kulesza, W. M., Chrobot, N., Doliński, D., Muniak, P., Bińkowska, D., Grzyb, T., & Genschow, O. (2022) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10919-022-00399-1 · Cited by 15
Rauchbauer, B., Pfabigan, D. M., & Lamm, C. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-30926-4 · Cited by 15
Imitation and interindividual differences: Belief in free will is not related to automatic imitation
Westfal, M., Crusius, J., & Genschow, O. (2021) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103374 · Cited by 13
Comparing self–other distinction across motor, cognitive and affective domains
Pronizius, E., Bukowski, H., & Lamm, C. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.240662 · Cited by 13
The automaticity of children’s imitative group bias
Essa, F., Sebanz, N., & Diesendruck, G. (2019) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100799 · Cited by 12
Anticipating actions and corticospinal excitability: A preregistered motor TMS experiment
Genschow, O., Bardi, L., & Braß, M. (2018) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.04.014 · Cited by 12
The submissive chameleon: Third-party inferences from observing mimicry
Genschow, O., & Alves, H. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103966 · Cited by 10
Mirror neurons and imitation learning in early motor development
Thanikkal, S. J. (2019) · Asian Journal of Applied Research · doi:10.20468/ajar/104654 · Cited by 10
Kämpf, M. S., Nestler, S., Hansmeier, J., Glombiewski, J. A., & Exner, C. (2020) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2020.1849849 · Cited by 10
Top-down social modulation of perception-action coupling
Cracco, E., Genschow, O., & Baess, P. (2021) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103481 · Cited by 9
Shaham, G., Mortillaro, M., & Aviezer, H. (2020) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13684 · Cited by 8
Collective Rhythm as an Emergent Property During Human Social Coordination
Farrera, A., & Ramos‐Fernández, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.772262 · Cited by 10
Group membership does not modulate goal- versus movement-based imitation
Genschow, O., Pauels, E., Krugmann, K., & Winter, A. (2022) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218221132842 · Cited by 8
The way others move can influence what we choose
Forbes, P., Suddell, S. F., Farmer, H., Logeswaran, Y., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2018) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021818808461 · Cited by 9
Dissociable effects of averted "gaze" on the priming of bodily representations and motor actions.
Carr, E. W., Bird, G., Catmur, C., & Winkielman, P. (2020) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103225 · Cited by 3
Model expertise does not influence automatic imitation
Nevejans, M., & Cracco, E. (2022) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-022-06338-2 · Cited by 9
Qureshi, A., Bretherton, L., Marsh, B., & Monk, R. L. (2020) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-020-00786-5 · Cited by 11
The inhibition of automatic imitation: a meta-analysis and synthesis of fMRI studies
Darda, K. M., & Ramsey, R. (2018) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/334938 · Cited by 43
Validation of an online imitation-inhibition task
Westfal, M., Cracco, E., Crusius, J., & Genschow, O. (2025) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-024-02557-3 · Cited by 6
Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures
Farmer, H., Mahmood, R., Gregory, S. E. A., Tishina, P., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2020) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103226 · Cited by 4
Wang, X., & Su, Y. (2019) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2019.00636 · Cited by 5
What are reaction time indices of automatic imitation measuring?Preprint
Ramsey, R. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/n8xvq · Cited by 6
Czekóová, K., Shaw, D. J., Pokorná, Z., & Brázdil, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00563 · Cited by 6
Maglieri, V., Riccobono, M. G., Giunchi, D., & Palagi, E. (2021) · Journal of Ethology · doi:10.1007/s10164-021-00701-6 · Cited by 7
Not so social after all: Video-based acquisition of observational stimulus-response bindings
Giesen, C. G., & Frings, C. (2021) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103330 · Cited by 4
How vertical elevation affects self-other integration as measured by the joint Simon effect
van der Weiden, A., Pril, D. M. A., Dittrich, K., Richter, J., & Lammers, J. (2021) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103404 · Cited by 4
Giesen, C. G., & Rothermund, K. (2022) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02058-4 · Cited by 5
Darda, K. M., Butler, E. E., & Ramsey, R. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rvh56 · Cited by 4
Concurrently observed actions are represented not as compound actions but as independent actions.
Cracco, E., Isterdael, C. V., Genschow, O., & Braß, M. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0001043 · Cited by 3
Top-Down Modulation of Motor Priming by Belief About Animacy
Cracco, E., Liepelt, R., Braß, M., & Genschow, O. (2023) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000605 · Cited by 4
How self-other control determines individual differences in adolescents’ theory of mind
Wang, X., Su, Y., Pei, M., & Hong, M. (2021) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101007 · Cited by 5
Automatic imitation of in- and out-group membersPreprint
Genschow, O., Westfal, M., Cracco, E., & Crusius, J. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/yurdk · Cited by 3
Riva, F., Pronizius, E., Lenger, M., Kronbichler, M., Silani, G., & Lamm, C. (2023) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsad034 · Cited by 1
Social Modulation of Imitative Behavior
Genschow, O., & Cracco, E. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-62634-0_11 · Cited by 2
Bretter, C., Unsworth, K. L., & Robinson, M. A. (2023) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218231208699 · Cited by 5
Automatic imitation in school-aged children
Wermelinger, S., Moersdorf, L., & Daum, M. M. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105797 · Cited by 2
Oomen, D., & Genschow, O. (2024) · Possibility Studies & Society · doi:10.1177/27538699241252883 · Cited by 2
The Effects of Online Status on Self-Other Processing as Revealed by Automatic Imitation
Farwaha, S., & Obhi, S. S. (2021) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2021.39.2.295 · Cited by 2
The self-other distinction in interpersonal interaction: A multi-level exploration
Tan, C.-H., Ma, S.-S., Zhu, C.-L., Yuan, Z., Wang, X.-Y., Shu, D.-M., & Liu, D. (2020) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2020.01890 · Cited by 4
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676649.001 · Cited by 2
Top-Down Modulation of Motor Priming by Belief About Animacy: A Registered Replication ReportPreprint
Cracco, E., Liepelt, R., Braß, M., & Genschow, O. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9q5rc · Cited by 2
The effect of automatic imitation in serial movements with different effectors
Ito, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1224673 · Cited by 1
Oliveros, J. C., Cortés-Rivera, C., & Ulloa, J. L. (2025) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.70099 · Cited by 1
Emotional Contagion and Autistic Traits: Disentangling Components of Social-Emotional Processing
Lundqvist, L. (2026) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-026-07240-4 · Cited by 1
What Is Human–Robot Interaction?
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676649.002 · Cited by 2
A Mini Review between Self-Other-Control and Empathy
Sun, Q., Chen, L., & Dong, Y. (2022) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2022.137073 · Cited by 2
Social Isolation Affects the Mimicry Response in the Use of Smartphones
Maglieri, V., Zanoli, A., Giunchi, D., & Palagi, E. (2023) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-023-09443-5 · Cited by 1
Covert and overt automatic imitation are correlated
Cracco, E., Genschow, O., & Braß, M. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02420-0 · Cited by 1
Automatic Imitation in Infants and Children
Farwaha, S., & Slaughter, V. P. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-62634-0_9 · Cited by 1
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676649.011 · Cited by 1
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676649.010 · Cited by 1
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676649.009 · Cited by 1
Similarity and automatic imitationPreprint
Genschow, O., Cracco, E., Verbeke, P., Westfal, M., & Crusius, J. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jnf8t · Cited by 1
Model expertise does not influence automatic imitationPreprint
Nevejans, M., & Cracco, E. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3nsk6 · Cited by 1
The drawing power of crowds revisited: Evidence for a two-step model of social group influencePreprint
Cracco, E., Bernardet, U., Sevenhant, R., Vandenhouwe, N., Copman, F., Durnez, W., Bombeke, K., & Braß, M. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/pdm4b · Cited by 1
Collective rhythm as an emergent property during human social coordinationPreprint
Farrera, A., & Ramos‐Fernández, G. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7cm3b · Cited by 1
Darda_individual_differences_cognitive_controlPreprint
Darda, K. M., Butler, E. E., & Ramsey, R. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8b4cz · Cited by 2
Measuring and Modulating Mimicry: Insights from Virtual Reality and Autism
Forbes, P. (2018) · UCL Discovery (University College London)
How do individuals high in psychopathic traits represent others’ beliefs and actions?Preprint
Genschow, O., Bardi, L., Rigoni, D., Uzieblo, K., & Braß, M. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2arn3
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676649.003
Impact of TEFRA on intangible drilling costs of individuals
Stewart, D. N., Wilding, R. W., Hecht, R. R., & Sommerfeldt, C. (1983) · Oil Gas Tax Q.; (United States)
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676649.004
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676649.007
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676649.012
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676649.005
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676649.008
Social group membership does not modulate automatic imitation in a contrastive multi-agent paradigmPreprint
Souter, L. D., Braem, S., Genschow, O., Braß, M., & Cracco, E. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hzp2k
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1017/9781108676649.014
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676649.013
Imitation and interindividual differences: Belief in free will is not related to automatic imitationPreprint
Westfal, M., Crusius, J., & Genschow, O. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bk2j4
Money priming and self-other focusPreprint
Genschow, O., Schuler, J., Cracco, E., Braß, M., & Wänke, M. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/dbqac
Metadata
- Authors
- Genschow, O., van Den Bossche, S., Cracco, E., Bardi, L., Rigoni, D., & Brass, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Cologne (DE)
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Genschow, Oliver
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2017-09-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e0183784
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5587324
- OpenAlex
- W2751775184
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 110
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 22.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (PZ00P1_168007)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Keywords
- mimicry, automatic imitation, action observation, reaction time, empathy, autistic traits, personality traits
- MeSH terms
- Biological Mimicry, Empathy, Female, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Male, Personality, Personality Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Socioeconomic Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
