Cited by 81Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UsePediatric Pain Management Techniques

The relationship of self-efficacy to catastrophizing and depressive symptoms in community-dwelling older adults with chronic pain: a moderated mediation model

Open access
Cheng, Sheung-Tak, Leung, Candi M. C., Chan, Ka Long, Chen, Phoon Ping, Chow, Yu Fat, Chung, Joanne W. Y., Law, Alexander C. B., Lee, Jenny S. W. +2 more·2018·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Self-efficacy has been consistently found to be a protective factor against psychological distress and disorders in the literature. However, little research is done on the moderating effect of self-efficacy on depressive symptoms in the context of chronic pain. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine if pain self-efficacy attenuated the direct relationship between pain intensity and depressive symptoms, as well as their indirect relationship through reducing the extent of catastrophizing when feeling pain (moderated mediation). 664 community-dwelling Chinese older adults aged 60-95 years who reported chronic pain for at least three months were recruited from social centers. They completed a battery of questionnaires on chronic pain, pain self-efficacy, catastrophizing, and depressive symptoms in individual face-to-face interviews. Controlling for age, gender, education, self-rated health, number of chronic diseases, pain disability, and pain self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing was found to partially mediate the connection between pain intensity and depressive symptoms. Furthermore, the relationship between pain intensity and depressive symptoms was moderated by pain self-efficacy. Self-efficacy was also found to moderate the relationship between pain intensity and catastrophizing and the moderated mediation effect was confirmed using bootstrap analysis. The results suggested that with increasing levels of self-efficacy, pain intensity's direct effect on depressive symptoms and its indirect effect on depressive symptoms via catastrophizing were both reduced in a dose-dependent manner. Our findings suggest that pain self-efficacy is a significant protective factor that contributes to psychological resilience in chronic pain patients by attenuating the relationship of pain intensity to both catastrophizing and depressive symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0203964

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cheng et al. (2018) concluded that self-efficacy is a protective factor for depressive symptoms in adults with chronic pain.

    “Cheng et al. (2018) evaluated the relationship between depressive symptoms in adults and pain self-efficacy and concluded that self-efficacy is a protective factor for depressive symptoms.”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a quasiexperimental study (2023) · cites this paper as Cheng et al. (2018)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, S.-T., Leung, C. M. C., Chan, K. L., Chen, P. P., Chow, Y. F., Chung, J. W. Y., Law, A. C. B., Lee, J. S. W., Leung, E. M. F., & Tam, C. W. C.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital (CN)
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital (CN)
  • Princess Margaret Hospital (HK)
  • United Christian Hospital (CN)
  • North District Hospital (HK)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Sheung-Tak
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2018-09-18
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
e0203964
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2892203720
Cited by
78
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Tai Hung Fai Charitable Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
pain self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, depressive symptoms, chronic pain, older adults, pain intensity, moderated mediation, psychological resilience, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Efficacy, Independent Living, Catastrophization, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review