Cited by 189Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Treatment

Validation of the Chinese Pain Catastrophizing Scale (HK-PCS) in Patients with Chronic Pain

Yap, Jacqueline C., Lau, Joseph, Chen, Phoon P., Gin, Tony, Wong, Tony, Chan, Ide, Chu, Josephine, Wong, Emma·2008·Pain Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to examine the psychometric properties of a Chinese translation of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (HK-PCS). DESIGN/PATIENTS: Patients aged 18-79 years (N = 130) with chronic nonmalignant pain attending an outpatient multidisciplinary pain center in Hong Kong participated in this cross-sectional study. METHOD: Subjects completed a set of health-related instruments: HK-PCS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, SF-36 Health Survey, and a general demographic questionnaire. Data were analyzed for the distribution, internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity. RESULTS: A satisfactory internal consistency was found (alpha = 0.927). The item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.575 to 0.777. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.969 for the total HK-PCS score, 0.956 for helplessness, 0.945 for magnification, and 0.910 for rumination. Confirmatory factor analysis verified a second-order factor structure with the comparative fit index = 1.00, root mean square error of approximation = 0.038, and normed fit index = 0.99 (chi(2) ((58)) = 68.84, P = 0.16). Significant correlations were found for pain intensity, disability, anxiety, and depression (r = 0.223-0.597, P < 0.01). The general health, social function, role emotional, and mental health domains of the SF-36 consistently demonstrated negative association with catastrophizing across all HK-PCS scores (r =-0.279 to -0.396, P < 0.01). No gender difference was noted for HK-PCS scores (P > 0.05), which is contrary to the existing literature. CONCLUSION: This study has illustrated satisfactory psychometric properties of the HK-PCS. We provide evidence for the validity and reliability of the HK-PCS as an instrument for measuring pain catastrophizing in the Chinese patient with chronic pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00307.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yap, J. C., Lau, J., Chen, P. P., Gin, T., Wong, T., Chan, I., Chu, J., & Wong, E.
Affiliations
  • Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Hospital Authority (HK)
Corresponding author
Yap, Jacqueline C.
Venue
Pain Medicine
Published
2008-03
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
186-195
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
OpenAlex
W2163414029
Cited by
189
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
pain catastrophizing, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Chinese translation, psychometric validation, chronic nonmalignant pain, helplessness, pain magnification, rumination, anxiety and depression, disability, SF-36, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Chronic Disease, Depression, Hong Kong, Humans, Language, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Incidence, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review