Cited by 16Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Concomitant treatment with sertraline and social skills training improves social skills acquisition in social anxiety disorder: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Open access
Bernik, Marcio, Corregiari, Fabio, Savoia, Mariangela Gentil, Barros Neto, Tito Paes de, Pinheiro, Cristiane, Neto, Francisco Lotufo·2018·PLoS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether: (1) sertraline (SER) + psychotherapy is superior to psychotherapy alone; (2) group cognitive-behavioural therapy (GCBT) is superior to group psychodynamic therapy (GPT) and (3) SER+GCBT or SER+GPT is superior to Placebo (PLA)+GCBT or PLA+GPT in social anxiety disorder (SAD). METHODS: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Participants were assigned either to: SER+GCBT (n = 34); SER+GPT (n = 36); PLA+GCBT (n = 36) or PLA+GPT (n = 41) for 20 weeks. SER (or PLA) was administered at doses from 50 to 200 mg/d. Primary measures were both categorial: remission (CGI score≤2), response of social symptoms (≥50% reduction in Scale of Avoidance and Social Discomfort (SASD)); and continuous: reduction of SASD and Multidimensional Scale of Social Expression(M-MSSE). RESULTS: SER exhibited better improvement of social anxiety symptoms rate than PLA (25.73% vs. 9.46%, P < .05). Neither GCBT differed from GPT (12.33% vs. 22.54%, P = .11) nor SER+GCBT from PLA+GCBT (17.65% vs. 7.69%, P = .20). However, SER+GPT was superior to PLA+GPT (33.33%, vs. 11.43%, P < .05). M-MSSE had superior improvement for SER+GCBT vs PLA+GCBT (P < .01) but not for SER+GPT vs. PLA+GPT (P = .80). SASD scores improvement were greater for SER than PLA (P < .01) and for SER+GCBT vs. PLA+GCBT (P < .05), but neither GCBT differed from GPT(P = .60) nor SER+GPT differed from PLA+GPT (P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: In overall, SER+psychotherapy was superior to psychotherapy alone. SER potentiated GCBT by enhancing social skills acquisition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 57551461.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0205809

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The efficacy of supportive therapy seems to happen almost as a norm among psychological intervention trials, which usually offer supportive therapy as a form of control intervention.

    “Contrary to our predictions, the efficacy of supportive therapy seems to happen almost as a norm among psychological intervention trials, which usually offer supportive therapy as a form of control intervention (Markowitz, 2014; Bernik et al., 2018).”

    From Inflammatory markers changes following acceptance-based behavioral psychotherapy in generalized anxiety disorder patients: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as Bernik et al., 2018

    The Discussion reports improvement with group psychodynamic therapy in this trial, but does not identify it as supportive therapy or describe it as a control intervention. Searches for supportive therapy as a control and for its efficacy across psychological intervention trials found no passage addressing either claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]First MB, Spitzer, Robert L, Gibbon Miriam, and Williams, Janet B.W. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Clinician Version (SCID-CV) Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press, Inc; 1996.
  2. [26]Watson D, Friend R. Measurement of Social-Evaluative Anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1969 Vol. 33 No. 4, 448– 457. 5810590

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernik, M., Corregiari, F., Savoia, M. G., Barros Neto, T. P. D., Pinheiro, C., & Neto, F. L.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2018-10-29
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
e0205809
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898655373
Cited by
16
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (BR) (97/11285-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, sertraline, social skills training, group cognitive behavioral therapy, combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, social skills development, social anxiety symptoms, treatment response, remission, placebo comparison
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Group, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Sertraline, Young Adult, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review