CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

De novo European eel transcriptome provides insights into the evolutionary history of duplicated genes in teleost lineages

Rozenfeld, Christoffer, Blanca, Jose, Gallego, Victor, García-Carpintero, Víctor, Herranz-Jusdado, Juan Germán, Pérez, Luz, Asturiano, Juan F., Cañizares, Joaquín, Peñaranda, David S.·2019·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0218085PMC PMC6561569
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0218085

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our results provide the first genome-wide support for delayed rediploidization in teleosts following the TGD.

    “Our results provide the first genome-wide support for delayed rediploidization in teleosts following the TGD, previously suggested as one potential explanation for the enigmatic evolutionary history of the Hox and rhodopsin genes in teleosts, and of several gene families in eels (Martin and Holland 2014; Nakamura et al. 2017; Rozenfeld et al. 2019).”

    From An atlas of fish genome evolution reveals delayed rediploidization following the teleost whole-genome duplication (2022) · cites this paper as Rozenfeld et al. 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. C Cañestro, 2013, Impact of gene gains, losses and duplication modes on the origin and diversification of vertebrates, Semin Cell Dev Biol, 24, 83, 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.12.008 · DOI
  2. B Llorente, 2000, Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetousy Yeasts: 18. comparative analysis of chromosome maps and synteny with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, FEBS Lett, 487, 101, 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)02289-4 · DOI
  3. JK Colbourne, 2011, The ecoresponsive genome of daphnia pulex, Science, 331, 555, 10.1126/science.1197761 · DOI
  4. JA Bailey, 2002, Recent segmental duplications in the human genome, Science, 297, 1003, 10.1126/science.1072047 · DOI
  5. R Vallente Samonte, 2016, Segmental duplications and the evolution of the primate genome, Nat Rev Genet, 3, 65, 10.1038/nrg705 · DOI
  6. T Blomme, 2006, The gain and loss of genes during 600 million years of vertebrate evolution, Genome Biol, 7, 1
  7. L David, 2003, Recent duplication of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) Genome as revealed by analyses of microsatellite loci, Mol Biol Evol, 20, 1425, 10.1093/molbev/msg173 · DOI
  8. J Lu, 2012, Profiling of gene duplication patterns of sequenced teleost genomes: evidence for rapid lineage-specific genome expansion mediated by recent tandem duplications, BMC Genomics, 13, 1
  9. EB Rondeau, 2014, The genome and linkage map of the northern pike (Esox lucius): Conserved synteny revealed between the salmonid sister group and the neoteleostei, PLoS One, 9, e102089, 10.1371/journal.pone.0102089 · DOI
  10. R Albalat, 2016, Evolution by gene loss, Nat Rev Genet, 17, 379, 10.1038/nrg.2016.39 · DOI · Paper page
  11. M Hafeez, 2016, Phylogenomic analysis reveals ancient segmental duplications in the human genome, Mol Phylogenet Evol, 94, 95, 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.08.019 · DOI
  12. FJJ Chain, 2014, Extensive copy-number variation of young genes across stickleback populations, PLoS Genet, 10, e1004830, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004830 · DOI
  13. BK Mable, 2004, Why polyploidy is rarer in animals than in plants’: myths and mechanisms, Biol J Linn Soc Blackwell Sci, 82, 453, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00332.x · DOI
  14. SP Otto, 2000, Polyploid incidence and evolution, Annu Rev Genet, 34, 401, 10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 · DOI · Paper page
  15. W Albertin, 2012, Polyploidy in fungi: Evolution after whole-genome duplication, Proc R Soc B Biol Sci, 279, 2497, 10.1098/rspb.2012.0434 · DOI
  16. J Schmutz, 2010, Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean, Nature, 463, 178, 10.1038/nature08670 · DOI
  17. JC Del Pozo, 2015, Whole genome duplications in plants: An overview from Arabidopsis, J Exp Bot, 66, 6991, 10.1093/jxb/erv432 · DOI
  18. DE Soltis, 2014, The polyploidy revolution then …and now: Stebbins revisited, Am J Bot, 101, 1057, 10.3732/ajb.1400178 · DOI
  19. J Masterson, 1994, Stomatal Size in Fossil Plants: Evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms, Science, 264, 421, 10.1126/science.264.5157.421 · DOI
  20. C Parisod, 2010, Evolutionary consequences of autopolyploidy, New Phytol, 186, 5, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03142.x · DOI
  21. G Blanc, 2004, Widespread Paleopolyploidy in Model Plant Species Inferred from Age Distributions of Duplicate Genes, Plant Cell Online, 16, 1667, 10.1105/tpc.021345 · DOI
  22. M Sémon, 2007, Consequences of genome duplication, Curr Opin Genet Dev, 17, 505, 10.1016/j.gde.2007.09.007 · DOI
  23. J Inoue, 2015, Rapid genome reshaping by multiple-gene loss after whole-genome duplication in teleost fish suggested by mathematical modeling, Proc Natl Acad Sci, 112, 14918, 10.1073/pnas.1507669112 · DOI · Paper page
  24. KH Wolfe, 2001, Yesterday’s polyploids and the mystery of diploidization, Nat Rev Genet, 2, 333, 10.1038/35072009 · DOI
  25. KS Kassahn, 2009, Evolution of gene function and regulatory control after whole-genome duplication: Comparative analyses in vertebrates, Genome Res, 19, 1404, 10.1101/gr.086827.108 · DOI
  26. X Wang, 2015, Telomere-centric genome repatterning determines recurring chromosome number reductions during the evolution of eukaryotes, New Phytol, 205, 378, 10.1111/nph.12985 · DOI
  27. SMK Glasauer, 2014, Whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes and its evolutionary consequences, Mol Genet Genomics, 289, 1045, 10.1007/s00438-014-0889-2 · DOI · Paper page
  28. M Chester, 2012, Extensive chromosomal variation in a recently formed natural allopolyploid species, Tragopogon miscellus (Asteraceae), Proc Natl Acad Sci, 109, 1176, 10.1073/pnas.1112041109 · DOI
  29. JL Gordon, 2011, Mechanisms of chromosome number evolution in yeast, PLoS Genet, 7, e1002190, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002190 · DOI
  30. P Dehal, 2005, Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate, PLoS Biol, 3, 1700, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030314 · DOI · Paper page
  31. A Christoffels, 2004, Fugu genome analysis provides evidence for a whole-genome duplication early during the evolution of ray-finned fishes, Mol Biol Evol, 21, 1146, 10.1093/molbev/msh114 · DOI
  32. K Vandepoele, 2004, Major events in the genome evolution of vertebrates: paranome age and size differ considerably between ray-finned fishes and land vertebrates, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101, 1638, 10.1073/pnas.0307968100 · DOI
  33. RA Leggatt, 2003, Occurrence of polyploidy in the fishes, Rev Fish Biol Fish, 13, 237, 10.1023/B:RFBF.0000033049.00668.fe · DOI
  34. LE Comber SC, 2004, Polyploidy in fishes: patterns and processes, Biol J Linn Soc, 82, 431, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00330.x · DOI
  35. I Braasch, 2016, Corrigendum: The spotted gar genome illuminates vertebrate evolution and facilitates human-teleost comparisons, Nat Genet, 48, 427, 10.1038/ng.3526 · DOI
  36. C Bian, 2016, The Asian arowana (Scleropages formosus) genome provides new insights into the evolution of an early lineage of teleosts, Sci Rep, 6, 1, 10.1038/srep24501 · DOI · Paper page
  37. S Lien, 2016, The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization, Nature, 533, 200, 10.1038/nature17164 · DOI
  38. PD Blischak, 2018, Integrating Networks, Phylogenomics, and Population Genomics for the Study of Polyploidy, Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 49, 253, 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032302 · DOI
  39. FM Robertson, 2017, Lineage-specific rediploidization is a mechanism to explain time-lags between genome duplication and evolutionary diversification, Genome Biol, 18, 1, 10.1186/s13059-017-1241-z · DOI · Paper page
  40. JE Wright, 1983, Meiotic models to explain classical linkage, pseudolinkage, and chromosome pairing in tetraploid derivative salmonid genomes, Isozymes Curr Top Biol Med Res, 10, 239
  41. C Berthelot, 2014, The rainbow trout genome provides novel insights into evolution after whole-genome duplication in vertebrates, Nat Commun, 5
  42. S Dufour, 2005, Dopaminergic inhibition of reproduction in teleost fishes: ecophysiological and evolutionary implications, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1040, 9, 10.1196/annals.1327.002 · DOI
  43. C V Henkel, 2012, Primitive duplicate hox clusters in the European eel’s genome, PLoS One, 7, e32231, 10.1371/journal.pone.0032231 · DOI
  44. AG Lafont, 2016, Three nuclear and two membrane estrogen receptors in basal teleosts, Anguilla sp.: Identification, evolutionary history and differential expression regulation, Gen Comp Endocrinol, 235, 177, 10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.11.021 · DOI
  45. G Maugars, 2015, Demonstration of the coexistence of duplicated LH receptors in teleosts, and their origin in ancestral actinopterygians, PLoS One, 10, e0135184, 10.1371/journal.pone.0135184 · DOI
  46. M Morini, 2015, Duplicated leptin receptors in two species of eel bring new insights into the evolution of the leptin system in vertebrates, PLoS One, 10, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0126008 · DOI
  47. C Pasqualini, 2009, Two distinct dopamine D2 receptor genes in the European eel: Molecular characterization, tissue-specific transcription, and regulation by sex steroids, Endocrinology, 150, 1377, 10.1210/en.2008-0578 · DOI
  48. J Pasquier, 2012, Multiple kisspeptin receptors in early osteichthyans provide new insights into the evolution of this receptor family, PLoS One, 7, e48931, 10.1371/journal.pone.0048931 · DOI
  49. C Rozenfeld, 2016, Abundance of specific mRNA transcripts impacts hatching success in European eel, Anguilla anguilla L, Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol, 191, 59, 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.09.011 · DOI
  50. M Morini, 2017, Nuclear and membrane progestin receptors in the European eel: Characterization and expression in vivo through spermatogenesis, Comp Biochem Physiol -Part A Mol Integr Physiol, 207, 79, 10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.02.009 · DOI
  51. V Ravi, 2018, The Divergent Genomes of Teleosts, Annu Rev Anim Biosci, 6, 47, 10.1146/annurev-animal-030117-014821 · DOI
  52. S Peña-Llopis, 2013, Simultaneous isolation of high-quality DNA, RNA, miRNA and proteins from tissues for genomic applications, Nat Protoc, 8, 2240, 10.1038/nprot.2013.141 · DOI
  53. AM Bolger, 2014, Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data, Bioinformatics, 30, 2114, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 · DOI · Paper page
  54. MR Crusoe, 2015, The khmer software package: enabling efficient nucleotide sequence analysis, F1000 Res, 4, 1
  55. J Pasquier, 2016, Gene evolution and gene expression after whole genome duplication in fish: the PhyloFish database, BMC Genomics, 17, 1
  56. BJ Haas, 2013, De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis, Nat Protoc, 8, 1494, 10.1038/nprot.2013.084 · DOI · Paper page
  57. R Patro, 2017, Salmon provides accurate, fast, and bias-aware transcript expression estimates using dual-phase inference, bioRxiv, 14, 417
  58. K Howe, 2013, The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome, Nature, 496, 498, 10.1038/nature12111 · DOI · Paper page
  59. W Kai, 2011, Integration of the genetic map and genome assembly of evolution in teleosts and mammals, Genome Biol Evol, 3, 424, 10.1093/gbe/evr041 · DOI
  60. M Schartl, 2013, The genome of the platyfish, Xiphophorus maculatus, provides insights into evolutionary adaptation and several complex traits, Nat Genet, 45, 567, 10.1038/ng.2604 · DOI
  61. K Nomura, 2018, Genetic parameters and quantitative trait loci analysis associated with body size and timing at metamorphosis into glass eels in captive-bred Japanese eels (Anguilla japonica), PLoS One, 13, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0201784 · DOI
  62. FA Simão, 2015, BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs, Bioinformatics, 31, 3210, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 · DOI · Paper page
  63. M Pertea, 2016, Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown, Nat Protoc, 11, 1650, 10.1038/nprot.2016.095 · DOI
  64. H Li, 2010, Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform, Bioinformatics, 26, 589, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 · DOI · Paper page
  65. L Li, 2003, OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes, Genome Res, 13, 2178, 10.1101/gr.1224503 · DOI · Paper page
  66. F Sievers, 2011, Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega, Mol Syst Biol, 7, 1
  67. S Capella-gutiérrez, 2009, trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses, Bioinformatics, 25, 1972, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 · DOI
  68. GSC Slater, 2005, Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison, BMC Bioinformatics, 6, 1
  69. B Boussau, 2012, Genome-scale coestimation of species and gene trees, Life Sci, 23, 323
  70. N Lartillot, 2009, PhyloBayes 3: A Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating, Bioinformatics, 25, 2286, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp368 · DOI · Paper page
  71. J Huerta-cepas, 2016, eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences, Nucleic Acids Res, 44, 286, 10.1093/nar/gkv1248 · DOI
  72. RD Finn, 2011, HMMER web server: Interactive sequence similarity searching, Nucleic Acids Res, 39, 29, 10.1093/nar/gkr367 · DOI · Paper page
  73. M Kanehisa, 2016, BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences, J Mol Biol, 428, 726, 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006 · DOI
  74. HY Hsu, 2015, De novo assembly of the whole transcriptome of the wild embryo, preleptocephalus, leptocephalus, and glass eel of Anguilla japonica and deciphering the digestive and absorptive capacities during early development, PLoS One, 10, 1
  75. A Coppe, 2010, Sequencing, de novo annotation and analysis of the first Anguilla anguilla transcriptome: EeelBase opens new perspectives for the study of the critically endangered European eel, BMC Genomics, 11, 1
  76. E Burgerhout, 2016, Changes in ovarian gene expression profiles and plasma hormone levels in maturing European eel (Anguilla anguilla); Biomarkers for broodstock selection, Gen Comp Endocrinol, 225, 185, 10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.08.006 · DOI
  77. E Ager-Wick, 2013, The pituitary gland of the European eel reveals massive expression of genes involved in the melanocortin system, PLoS One, 8, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0077396 · DOI
  78. DJ Macqueen, 2014, A well-constrained estimate for the timing of the salmonid whole genome duplication reveals major decoupling from species diversification, Proc R Soc B, 281, 1
  79. Y Minegishi, 2005, Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the freshwater eels genus Anguilla based on the whole mitochondrial genome sequences, Mol Phylogenet Evol, 34, 134, 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.09.003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rozenfeld, C., Blanca, J., Gallego, V., García-Carpintero, V., Herranz-Jusdado, J. G., Pérez, L., Asturiano, J. F., Cañizares, J., & Peñaranda, D. S.
ORCID
Asturiano, Juan F.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2019-06-12
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
e0218085
ISSN
1932-6203
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0218085
PMC
PMC6561569
Cited by
28
References
3
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review