Cited by 59Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStress Responses and CortisolHealth, psychology, and well-being

Mindfulness training and systemic low-grade inflammation in stressed community adults: Evidence from two randomized controlled trials

Open access
Villalba, Daniella K., Lindsay, Emily K., Marsland, Anna L., Greco, Carol M., Young, Shinzen, Brown, Kirk Warren, Smyth, Joshua M., Walsh, Catherine P. +3 more·2019·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Mindfulness interventions have garnered significant attention as a complementary health treatment for many physical and psychological conditions. While some research has shown that mindfulness training can decrease psychological and physiological stress responses, it remains unclear whether mindfulness training impacts inflammation-a predictor of poor health outcomes. In addition, little research has examined the active components of mindfulness that may drive health-related improvements. Here, we provide data from two 3-arm randomized controlled trials that examined the effect of mindfulness training on inflammation in stressed community adults. Specifically, we examined whether training individuals to have an accepting attitude towards present moment experiences is a key emotion regulation skill that can lead to decreases in inflammation. Both studies randomly assigned participants to one of three conditions: mindfulness training that taught both attention monitoring and acceptance skills (Monitor+Accept); mindfulness training teaching monitoring without the acceptance component (Monitor Only); or a control condition. Study 1 employed a novel 2-week smartphone-based intervention and Study 2 employed a standard 8-week Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) intervention. We hypothesized that Monitor+Accept training would lead to reductions in the inflammatory biomarker C-Reactive Protein (CRP) compared to Monitor Only training and control groups. Contrary to this hypothesis, we found that Monitor+Accept mindfulness training did not lead to reductions in CRP. Exploratory analyses combining study subsamples, however, suggest that both mindfulness interventions may reduce CRP in populations at risk for systemic inflammation-midlife-to-older adults and individuals with high BMI. Overall, the present studies contribute significantly to the question of whether mindfulness interventions can reduce systemic markers of low-grade inflammation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0219120

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mindfulness intervention can diminish the level of C reactive protein in people with high inflammation (overweight or overstressed adults aged 45 years and over).

    “Mindfulness intervention can diminish the level of C reactive protein in people with high inflammation (overweight or overstressed adults aged 45 years and over).26”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villalba, D. K., Lindsay, E. K., Marsland, A. L., Greco, C. M., Young, S., Brown, K. W., Smyth, J. M., Walsh, C. P., Gray, K., Chin, B., & Creswell, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Villalba, Daniella K.
  • Lindsay, Emily K.
  • Marsland, Anna L.
  • Greco, Carol M.
  • Young, Shinzen
  • Brown, Kirk Warren
  • Smyth, Joshua M.
  • Walsh, Catherine P.
  • Gray, Katarina
  • Chin, Brian
  • Creswell, J. David
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2019-07-11
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
e0219120
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2960173629
Cited by
59
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health (R21AT008493, 3R21AT008493-02S1, F32AT009508)
  • Center for Complementary & Integrative Health (R01AT008685)
  • Yoga Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
mindfulness training, low-grade inflammation, C-reactive protein, stress, acceptance, attention monitoring, emotion regulation, mindfulness-based stress reduction, smartphone-based intervention, body mass index, inflammatory markers
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adolescent, Adult, C-Reactive Protein, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Middle Aged, Residence Characteristics, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, Biomarkers, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review