Cited by 52Infection Control and VentilationInfection Control in HealthcareOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

The need of health policy perspective to protect Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 pandemic. A GRADE rapid review on the N95 respirators effectiveness

Open access
Iannone, Primiano, Castellini, Greta, Coclite, Daniela, Napoletano, Antonello, Fauci, Alice Josephine, Iacorossi, Laura, D’Angelo, Daniela, Renzi, Cristina +3 more·2020·PLOS ONE

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protecting Health Care Workers (HCWs) during routine care of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients is of paramount importance to halt the SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2) pandemic. The WHO, ECDC and CDC have issued conflicting guidelines on the use of respiratory filters (N95) by HCWs. We searched PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library from the inception to March 21, 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing N95 respirators versus surgical masks for prevention of COVID-19 or any other respiratory infection among HCWs. The grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Four RCTs involving 8736 HCWs were included. We did not find any trial specifically on prevention of COVID-19. However, wearing N95 respirators can prevent 73 more (95% CI 46-91) clinical respiratory infections per 1000 HCWs compared to surgical masks (2 RCTs; 2594 patients; low quality of evidence). A protective effect of N95 respirators in laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.41; 95%CI 0.28-0.61) was also found. A trend in favour of N95 respirators was observed in preventing laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza like illness. We found no direct high quality evidence on whether N95 respirators are better than surgical masks for HCWs protection from SARS-CoV-2. However, low quality evidence suggests that N95 respirators protect HCWs from clinical respiratory infections. This finding should be contemplated to decide the best strategy to support the resilience of healthcare systems facing the potentially catastrophic SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234025

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]Higgins JPT GS. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 [Available from: https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_16/16_3_2_assessing_risk_of_bias_in_cluster_randomized_trials.htm.
  2. [35]Higgins JPT GS. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 [Available from: https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_16/16_3_2_assessing_risk_of_bias_in_cluster_randomized_trials.htm.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iannone, P., Castellini, G., Coclite, D., Napoletano, A., Fauci, A. J., Iacorossi, L., D’Angelo, D., Renzi, C., La Torre, G., Mastroianni, C. M., & Gianola, S.
Affiliations
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
  • IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio (IT)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Castellini, Greta
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-06-03
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
e0234025
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3031052409
Cited by
52
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 8
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
N95 respirators, healthcare workers, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, surgical masks, respiratory infection prevention, personal protective equipment, bacterial colonization, respiratory viral infections, influenza-like illness, health policy, healthcare worker safety
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Health Personnel, Humans, Masks, Pneumonia, Viral, Respiratory Protective Devices, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Infection Control, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review