Cited by 22Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDiabetes Management and EducationMental Health Treatment and Access

People with diabetes need a lower cut-off than others for depression screening with PHQ-9

Open access
Cichoń, Ewelina, Kiejna, Andrzej, Kokoszka, Andrzej, Gondek, Tomasz M., Radzio, Rafał, Jastrzębski, Adam, Andrzejewska, Beata E., Alosaimi, Fahad D. +2 more·2020·PLOS ONE

Abstract

AIMS: This study evaluated the psychometric characteristics of the Polish version of the PHQ-9 in detecting major depression (MDD) and 'MDD and/or dysthymia' in people with and without type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Participants were randomly selected from a diabetes outpatient facility (N = 216) and from among patients admitted to a medical center and psychiatric hospital (N = 99). The participants completed the PHQ-9. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview were used to identify the presence of psychiatric symptoms. The optimal cut-offs for PHQ-9 in people with and without type 2 diabetes were investigated based on two methods: 1) Youden's index which identifies cut-off points useful in scientific research; 2) a second method of two-stage screening for depressive disorders to provide guidance for clinical practice. RESULTS: The Polish version of the PHQ-9 is a reliable and valid screening tool for depression in people with and without type 2 diabetes. An optimal cut-off of ≥ 7 was indicated by Youden's index and ≥ 5 by the two-stage method for screening for MDD and 'MDD and/or dysthymia' in the group with type 2 diabetes. A cut-off of ≥ 11 was optimal for screening for both MDD and 'MDD and/or dysthymia' among people without diabetes (Youden's index). The two-stage approach suggested a ≥ 10 score for screening for MDD and ≥ 9 for screening for 'MDD and/or dysthymia' in people without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: A lower cut-off score of the PHQ-9 is recommended for people with type 2 diabetes as compared to the general population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0240209

Cites

60 of 62 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [51]Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory Third Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. doi:34567890 DOCmoC 998765 ISBN.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cichoń, E., Kiejna, A., Kokoszka, A., Gondek, T. M., Radzio, R., Jastrzębski, A., Andrzejewska, B. E., Alosaimi, F. D., Lloyd, C. E., & Sartorius, N.
Affiliations
  • WSB Merito University in Torun (PL)
  • Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
  • King Saud University (SA)
  • The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Cichoń, Ewelina
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-10-23
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
e0240209
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094598913
Cited by
22
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Sanofi
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
PHQ-9, depression screening, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, dysthymia, screening cut-off values, Youden index, two-stage screening, psychometric validation, diabetic patients
MeSH terms
Patient Health Questionnaire, Major Depressive Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Poland, Reproducibility of Results, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review