Cited by 96COVID-19 Digital Contact TracingMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsData-Driven Disease Surveillance

Facilitators and barriers to engagement with contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks: a rapid review of the evidence

Open access
Megnin-Viggars, Odette, Carter, Patrice, Melendez-Torres, G. J., Weston, Dale, Rubin, G. James·2020·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Until a vaccine is developed, a test, trace and isolate strategy is the most effective method of controlling the COVID-19 outbreak. Contact tracing and case isolation are common methods for controlling infectious disease outbreaks. However, the effectiveness of any contact tracing system rests on public engagement. Numerous factors may influence an individual's willingness to engage with a contact tracing system. Understanding these factors has become urgent during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To identify facilitators and barriers to uptake of, and engagement with, contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks. METHOD: A rapid systematic review was conducted to identify papers based on primary research, written in English, and that assessed facilitators, barriers, and other factors associated with the uptake of, and engagement with, a contact tracing system. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Four themes were identified as facilitators to the uptake of, and engagement with, contact tracing: collective responsibility; personal benefit; co-production of contact tracing systems; and the perception of the system as efficient, rigorous and reliable. Five themes were identified as barriers to the uptake of, and engagement with, contact tracing: privacy concerns; mistrust and/or apprehension; unmet need for more information and support; fear of stigmatization; and mode-specific challenges. CONCLUSIONS: By focusing on the factors that have been identified, contact tracing services are more likely to get people to engage with them, identify more potentially ill contacts, and reduce transmission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0241473

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9]Ada Lovelace Institute. Exit through the app store? a rapid evidence review on the technical considerations and societal implications of using technology to transition from the COVID-19 crisis. 20 April 2020. https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/exit-through-the-app-store-how-the-uk-government-should-use-technology-to-transition-from-the-covid-19-global-public-health-crisis/
  2. [13]BMJ: Critical appraisal checklist for a questionaire study. BMJ 2004; 328. https://www.bmj.com/content/328/7451/1312/related.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Megnin-Viggars, O., Carter, P., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Weston, D., & Rubin, G. J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-10-29
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
e0241473
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097958417
Cited by
95
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 26
FWCI
16.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Go-Science
  • National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response
  • National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Behaviour Change and Evaluation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
Keywords
contact tracing, COVID-19 pandemic, infectious disease outbreaks, citizen participation, willingness to engage, barriers and facilitators, collective responsibility, privacy concerns, distrust, stigmatization, co-production, case isolation
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Disease Outbreaks, Humans, Patient Participation, Pneumonia, Viral, Social Responsibility, Stereotyping, Contact Tracing, Coronavirus Infections, Privacy, Trust, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review