Cited by 58Impact of Technology on AdolescentsTechnology Use by Older AdultsMedia and Digital Communication

Who is mentally healthy? Mental health profiles of Japanese social networking service users with a focus on LINE, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

Open access
Sakurai, Ryota, Nemoto, Yuta, Mastunaga, Hiroko, Fujiwara, Yoshinori·2021·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both negative and positive associations between social networking service (SNS) usage and mental health have been suggested by previous studies; however, their differences by type of SNS and age remain unclear. We addressed this issue based on the frequency of traditional communication such as face-to-face and non-face-to-face communication (e.g., phone, email, and letters). METHODS: In total, 8,576 individuals participated, including 2,543 aged 18-39, 3,048 aged 40-64, and 2,985 aged over 65 years. They were asked to indicate their frequency of SNS usage, both for posting and checking, of LINE (a popular message application in Japan), Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, with frequent usage defined as posting or checking more than a few times a week. To determine mental health status, WHO-5 (i.e., well-being), K6 (i.e., distress symptoms), and feelings of loneliness were assessed. Multiple and logistic regression analyses were adjusted for the frequency of traditional communication. To avoid type 1 error, a Bonferroni correction of p ≤ 0.002 was applied in the regression models (p = 0.05/18, a number of regression models). RESULTS: The most frequently used SNS across the three age groups was LINE; frequent usage (both posting and checking) among older adults was independently associated with better well-being. Frequent posting on Facebook was associated with better well-being in middle-aged adults. Young adults who frequently checked on Instagram showed a tendency toward better well-being and lower distress symptoms. On the contrary, frequent usage of Twitter was associated with distress symptoms or feelings of loneliness across all three age groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found generational and SNS-type-dependent negative and positive associations between SNS use and mental health, indicating the possible influences of SNS use and the importance of non-SNS communication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0246090

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The only study that compared older and younger/middle-aged adults found generally more positive associations of active and passive social media uses for older adults.

    “the only study that compared older and younger/middle-aged adults (Sakurai et al., 2021) found generally more positive associations of active and passive SMUs for older adults.”

    From Are active and passive social media use related to mental health, wellbeing, and social support outcomes? A meta-analysis of 141 studies (2023) · cites this paper as Sakurai et al., 2021

    The Results section (page not provided) compares young, middle-aged, and older adults and finds that both posting and checking on LINE are associated with better well-being in older adults. But the Discussion’s summary reports positive associations for different services in younger and middle-aged adults and no common positive association across generations; the Facebook discussion finds a positive association only for middle-aged adults. The paper therefore supports an older-adult finding for LINE, not generally more positive associations of active and passive social media use among older adults. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sakurai, R., Nemoto, Y., Mastunaga, H., & Fujiwara, Y.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (JP)
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
Corresponding author
Sakurai, Ryota
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2021-03-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
e0246090
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134008627
Cited by
57
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5
FWCI
14.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Japan Support Center for Suicide Countermeasures
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (the Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social networking services, mental health, lines, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, well-being, distress symptoms, loneliness, age differences, generational differences, non-face-to-face communication, Japanese adults
MeSH terms
Online Social Networking, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Japan, Loneliness, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Logistic Models, Young Adult, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review