Cited by 20Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

A novel smartphone app to change risk behaviors of women after gestational diabetes: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Potzel, Anne L., Gar, Christina, Banning, Friederike, Sacco, Vanessa, Fritsche, Andreas, Fritsche, Louise, Müssig, Karsten, Dauben, Laura +2 more·2022·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Aims: Women after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are a risk group for cardiometabolic diseases but are hard to reach by conventional lifestyle programs. Therefore, we tested whether a novel, smartphone-delivered intervention,TRIANGLE, is accepted by women after GDM and alters cardiometabolic risk behaviors and outcomes.TRIANGLE targets gradual habit change of mind and emotion, physical activity, nutrition, and sleep. Methods: We conducted a 6-month multicenter, randomized-controlled trial of TRIANGLE versus standard care with 66 women 3–18 months after GDM in Germany. The primary outcome was the proportion of women achieving ≥3 out of 5 Diabetes Prevention Program goals, i.e. physical activity ≥150 min/week (moderate to high intensity), fiber intake ≥15 g/1,000 kcal, fat intake <30% of total energy intake, saturated fat intake <10% of total energy intake, and weight reduction ≥5% if BMI ≥23 kg/m 2 or weight maintenance if BMI <23 kg/m 2. Intervention participants also rated the TRIANGLE app in the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). Results: In the predefined, modified intention-to-treat analysis including 64 women, 6 out of 27 women in the intervention group [22%(10–40)] and 3 out of 27 women in the control group [11%(3–27)] reached the primary outcome (p = 0.47). In the predefined per-protocol intervention subgroup, the proportion was 4 out of 14 women [29%(11–55); p = 0.20 vs. control].TRIANGLE app users were active on 42% of days and rated the app’s quality and perceived impact with 4.3±0.8 out of 5 uMARS points. Conclusions: This first trial did not show the efficacy of the TRIANGLE intervention. However, the app was well accepted and considered helpful by most users. Therefore, this trial supports further development and testing of TRIANGLE and other app interventions for women after GDM. Additionally, it identifies necessary adaptations in trial design to better accommodate non-intensive lifestyle interventions for this target group. Trial registration: Trial registration at drks.de (DRKS00012996).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0267258

Cites

40 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TM effects on consumer experience were varied: 5 (71.4%) studies reported positive effects, 1 (14.2%) no discernible effect, and 1 (14.2%) mixed effects.

    “The effects of TM on consumer experience were varied, with 5 (71.4%) studies [39,44,48,53,54] reporting positive effects, 1 (14.2%) study [5] with no discernible effect, and 1 (14.2%) study [55] with mixed effects.”

    From Digital Health Interventions to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Results section on process measures reports high user ratings of the app (4.3 out of 5), and the Discussion says users accepted it and deemed it effective. The paper’s lack of a significant intervention effect concerns its primary clinical outcome, not a lack of discernible positive consumer experience. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Of 3 DCP studies on consumer experience, Cha et al and Potzel et al reported better experience outcomes for patients in the DHI groups, while Block et al showed no effect.

    “Of the 3 (23.1%) studies reporting the effectiveness of DCP on consumer experience, Cha et al [48] and Potzel et al [44] reported better experience outcomes for patients in the DHI groups, while Block et al [5] showed no effect.”

    From Digital Health Interventions to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Results (Per-protocol group; page unavailable) report higher well-being and lower perceived stress than in controls among regular app users, but these differences were not statistically significant. The Results (Process measures of the intervention; page unavailable) also report favorable app ratings from users, without a control-group comparison. Thus the paper supports favorable experience findings, but not a clear improvement across the intervention group. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Of 5 TM studies on T2DM development, 1 by Sakane et al indicated TM is effective, and the other 4 did not show significant differences compared to the control group.

    “Of the 5 (20%) studies reporting the effects of TM on T2DM development, only 1 (20%) study by Sakane et al [39] indicated that TM is effective. The other 4 (80%) studies [35,40,44,50] did not show any significant differences compared to the control group.”
  • Two DCP studies reported prevention effectiveness, and both had a neutral effect.

    “In addition, 2 (15.4%) studies [40,44] reported prevention effectiveness of DCP, and both had a neutral effect.”
  • Of 12 DCP studies assessing dysglycemia, 9 (75%) reported positive population health outcomes and 3 (25%) showed neutral effects.

    “Of the 12 studies (92.3%) assessing the effects of dysglycemia, 9 (75%) reported positive population health outcomes, such as significant HbA1c reduction compared to the control group in Kim et al [45] using virtual reality (VR) technology and Everett et al [46] using AI interventions (P<.05). Furthermore, 3 (25%) studies [40,44,47] showed the effect was neutral.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Potzel, A. L., Gar, C., Banning, F., Sacco, V., Fritsche, A., Fritsche, L., Müssig, K., Dauben, L., Seissler, J., & Lechner, A.
Affiliations
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. (DE)
Corresponding author
Lechner, Andreas
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2022-04-27
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
e0267258
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226059963
Cited by
20
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • else kröner-fresenius-stiftung (2014_A186)
  • German Center for Diabetes Research (82DZD01902)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, smartphone-based intervention, triangles, cardiometabolic risk, lifestyle intervention, physical activity, dietary fiber intake, saturated fat intake, weight loss, habit change, app acceptance, mobile health
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Pregnancy, Risk-Taking, Diabetes, Gestational, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review