Examining public views on decentralised health data sharing
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, researchers have begun to explore the use of Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT), also known as blockchain, in health data sharing contexts. However, there is a significant lack of research that examines public attitudes towards the use of this technology. In this paper, we begin to address this issue and present results from a series of focus groups which explored public views and concerns about engaging with new models of personal health data sharing in the UK. We found that participants were broadly in favour of a shift towards new decentralised models of data sharing. Retaining ‘proof’ of health information stored about patients and the capacity to provide permanent audit trails, enabled by immutable and transparent properties of DLT, were regarded as particularly valuable for our participants and prospective data custodians. Participants also identified other potential benefits such as supporting people to become more health data literate and enabling patients to make informed decisions about how their data was shared and with whom. However, participants also voiced concerns about the potential to further exacerbate existing health and digital inequalities. Participants were also apprehensive about the removal of intermediaries in the design of personal health informatics systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Decentralized data-sharing offers increased privacy and security, improved data ownership and control, and enhanced transparency and accountability.
“In addition, decentralized data-sharing offers several benefits, such as increased privacy and security, improved data ownership and control, and enhanced transparency and accountability [8].”
From Federated learning meets blockchain in decentralized data-sharing: Healthcare use case (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis
Boyle, C., & Barker, A. (2006) · QMiP Bulletin · doi:10.53841/bpsqmip.2006.1.2.36 · Cited by 11,842 · see citing works
Change by design : how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation
Brown, T., & Kātz, B. M. (2009) · Cited by 2,616 · see citing works
MedRec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data Access and Permission Management
Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., & Lippman, A. (2016) · 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD) · doi:10.1109/obd.2016.11 · Cited by 2,526 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…cyber-attacks on care institutions and the subsequent implications for patient data privacy [13] have led researchers to consider alternative data exchange models for better securing and protecting patients’ health data, including Internet of Things (IoT) approaches [14, 15] and DLTs [16, 17].”
Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences
Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1320645111 · Cited by 1,159 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Chat comments were moderated by a researcher and any points raised via this facility were introduced to verbal discussions throughout the duration of the focus group.”
Dagher, G. G., Mohler, J., Milojkovic, M., & Marella, P. B. (2018) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.014 · Cited by 854 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Several studies have explored the use of smart contracts, zero-knowledge proofs [5, 17, 22–25], and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) [26] to provide patients with new data-sharing capabilities that prioritise user privacy, data integrity and security.”
A Systematic Review of the Use of Blockchain in Healthcare
Hölbl, M., Kompara, M., Kamišalić, A., & Nemec Zlatolas, L. (2018) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym10100470 · Cited by 780 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…S ub m i tt e V e r s i o personal health monitoring technologies offer additional benefits when compared to more traditional, centralised models [1,2]. introducing DLT within health the gap of user-oriented of a longitudinal co-design enable (i) patients within ) provide clinicians and health…”
Blockchain in healthcare and health sciences—A scoping review
Hasselgren, A., Kralevska, K., Gligoroski, D., Pedersen, S. A., & Faxvaag, A. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104040 · Cited by 676 · see citing works
Why should we promote public engagement with science?
Stilgoe, J., Lock, S. J., & Wilsdon, J. (2014) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662513518154 · Cited by 639 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Discussion groups were capped at a maximum of six participants in order to maximise opportunities for all participants to express their views.”
Blockchains and Data Protection in the European Union
Finck, M. (2018) · European Data Protection Law Review · doi:10.21552/edpl/2018/1/6 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
A blockchain-based scheme for privacy-preserving and secure sharing of medical data
Huang, H., Zhu, P., Xiao, F., Sun, X., & Huang, Q. (2020) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2020.102010 · Cited by 188 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Several studies have explored the use of smart contracts, zero-knowledge proofs [5, 17, 22–25], and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) [26] to provide patients with new data-sharing capabilities that prioritise user privacy, data integrity and security.”
Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: Risk communication or ‘upstream engagement’?
Pidgeon, N., & Rogers-Hayden, T. (2007) · Health Risk & Society · doi:10.1080/13698570701306906 · Cited by 180 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Project participants were provided with an information sheet about the study and the project team obtained written, informed consent to take part in the project prior to engaging in focus group discussions.”
A Survey on Blockchain-Based Self-Sovereign Patient Identity in Healthcare
Houtan, B., Hafid, A. S., & Makrakis, D. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2994090 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
On the Design of a Blockchain-Based System to Facilitate Healthcare Data Sharing
Theodouli, A., Arakliotis, S., Moschou, K., Votis, K., & Tzovaras, D. K. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom/bigdatase.2018.00190 · Cited by 150 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Extensive investigation has been conducted to assess of leveraging novel applications of DLT technologies in 16,19–21].”
Esmaeilzadeh, P., & Mirzaei, T. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/14184 · Cited by 148 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In contrast to previous work [8–10], we aim to prioritise and account for a broad range of end-user needs and concerns.”
Interoperability in Healthcare: Benefits, Challenges and Resolutions
Iroju, O. G., Soriyan, A., Gambo, I., & Janet, O. (2013) · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology
Trench, B. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003039242 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Yeung, K. (2019) · The Modern Law Review · doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12399 · Cited by 101 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The concerns highlighted by our participants echo existing debates within legal literature around DLT application with regards to legal frameworks such as GDPR [3, 43, 44].”
Shabani, M. (2018) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocy149 · Cited by 99 · cited 2× · see citing works
“As the DLT provides both a transparent and immutable ledger of all transactions to all nodes, this holds significant appeal in terms of auditing capabilities [18].”
Understanding Public Responses to Emerging Technologies: A Narrative Approach
Macnaghten, P., Davies, S. R., & Kearnes, M. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2015.1053110 · Cited by 96 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Each focus group included discussion based on at least two of the aforementioned scenarios which were rotated between discussion groups in order to ensure equal exposure.”
Tomaz, E. B., do Nascimento, J. C., Hafid, A. S., & de Souza, J. N. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3036811 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Blockchain in Health Care: Hope or Hype?
El-Gazzar, R. F., & Stendal, K. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/17199 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Blockchain-based Interoperable Healthcare using Zero-Knowledge Proofs and Proxy Re-Encryption
Sharma, B., Halder, R., & Singh, J. (2020) · International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS) · doi:10.1109/comsnets48256.2020.9027413 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Advanced security model for multimedia data sharing in Internet of Things
Dhar, S., Khare, A., & Singh, R. (2022) · Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · doi:10.1002/ett.4621 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Technology of imagination: a card-based public engagement method for debating emerging technologies
Felt, U., Schumann, S., Schwarz-Plaschg, C. G., & Strassnig, M. (2013) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794112468468 · Cited by 65 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In order to enrich participant discussions and broaden the debate, we included a range of alternative stakeholder viewpoints and data sharing contexts to help the public to imagine a wide range of perspectives [38].”
InfluentialiCONCUR: informed consent for clinical data and bio-sample use for research
Kim, H., Bell, E., Kim, J., Sitapati, A. M., Ramsdell, J., Farcas, C., Friedman, D., Feupe, S. F., & Lucila Ohno-machado, A. (2016) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw115 · Cited by 64 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Discussion in focus groups around smart contracts echoes the current research around informed consent in healthcare [42].”
Macnaghten, P. (2020) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794120919096 · Cited by 59 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Discussion groups were capped at a maximum of six participants in order to maximise opportunities for all participants to express their views.”
Enabling Patient Control of Personal Electronic Health Records Through Distributed Ledger Technology
Cunningham, J. A., & Ainsworth, J. (2017) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-830-3-45 · Cited by 54 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This type of approach is often used for engaging a lay audience with unfamiliar, emerging technologies, such as discussion methods derived from clinical research [33] and contextualising properties of technology within more familiar terms of reference [34].”
Self-citationLehoux, P., Miller, F. A., & Williams–Jones, B. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119800 · Cited by 54 · cited 1× · see citing works
“.’s [30] work is representative of an early attempt to involve the public in the co-creation of a blockchain-based technical artefact that aimed to seed follow-on discussions exploring attitudes towards the use of DLTs to “manage, control and share” [30] personal health data.”
Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Big Data Management: Benefits, Applications and Challenges
Bazel, M. A., Mohammed, F., & Ahmad, M. B. (2021) · International Conference on Emerging Smart Technologies and Applications (eSmarTA) · doi:10.1109/esmarta52612.2021.9515747 · Cited by 50 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Extensive investigation has been conducted to assess of leveraging novel applications of DLT technologies in 16,19–21].”
Subbian, V., Solomonides, A. E., Clarkson, M. D., Rahimzadeh, V. N., Petersen, C. C., Schreiber, R., DeMuro, P. R., Dua, P., Goodman, K. W., Kaplan, B., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa188 · Cited by 48 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Another narrative and featured a health passport offering an authoritative, tamper-proof record of a person’s health or immunisation status [39].”
Socio-Technical Considerations for the Use of Blockchain Technology in Healthcare
Chao, W. M., Chien, Y. K., & Nøhr, C. (2018) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-852-5-636 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Attitudes Toward Blockchain Technology in Managing Medical Information: Survey Study
Hau, Y. S., Lee, J. M., Park, J. C., & Chang, M. C. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/15870 · Cited by 38 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The resulting series of narrative use-case scenarios were located in the wider area of blockchain and healthcare data management and included material drawn from related work into recent research trends and use cases (For an overview please visit the CDIP project website: https://cdip.lancs.ac.uk/).”
Yeung, K. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/24109 · Cited by 37 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In contrast to our focus on public concerns, Yeung [29] engaged with care professionals and blockchain experts to derive implementation challenges of block-chain-based applications based on views from healthcare organisations.”
Privacy-preserving ledger for blockchain and Internet of Things-enabled cyber-physical systems
Singh, R., Dwivedi, A. D., Mukkamala, R. R., & Alnumay, W. S. (2022) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108290 · Cited by 32 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, the consequences of high-profile cyber-attacks on care institutions and the subsequent implications for patient data privacy [13] have led researchers to consider alternative data exchange models for better securing and protecting patients’ health data, including Internet of Things (IoT) approaches [14, 15] a…”
Blockchain Challenges Traditional Contract Law: Just How Smart Are Smart Contracts?
Temte, M. N. (2019) · Wyoming Law Review · doi:10.59643/1942-9916.1409 · Cited by 31 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, parallels can be drawn to legislation introduced in Wyoming where blockchain enabled, decentralized networks still have to register with a named contact to resolve liability and agency issues [45,46].”
Comparison of Smart Contract Blockchains for Healthcare Applications.
Yu, H., Sun, H., Wu, D., & Kuo, T.-T. (2019) · PubMed Central · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Boenink, M., van der Scheer, L., Garcia, E., & van der Burg, S. (2018) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-018-0319-8 · Cited by 30 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This type of approach is often used for engaging a lay audience with unfamiliar, emerging technologies, such as discussion methods derived from clinical research [33] and contextualising properties of technology within more familiar terms of reference [34].”
Lu, C., Batista, D. A., Hamouda, H. A., & Lemieux, V. L. (2020) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/21995 · Cited by 24 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This piece of work explicitly aimed to identify user requirements as an initial assessment of laypersons attitudes to DLT features and how they contextualized them within their experiences of interacting with technology-enabled healthcare.”
Wearable Devices and COVID-19: State of the Art, Framework, and Challenges
Krishnamurthi, R., Gopinathan, D., & Kumar, A. (2021) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60039-6_8 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Sharing personal health data from clinical records, wearable fitness and location-tracking devices enables clinical researchers to deliver more timely and effective medical interventions to address significant health challenges in society [12].”
An Electronic Medical Record Management System Based on Smart Contracts
Yang, W.-K., Chen, J.-S., & Chen, Y.-S. (2019) · International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing (UMEDIA) · doi:10.1109/ubi-media.2019.00050 · Cited by 18 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, several studies [23,27] have investigated the use to streamline the sharing of patient healthcare records.”
Non-Fungible Tokens as a Mechanism for Representing Patient Consent
Cunningham, J. A., Davies, N., Devaney, S., Holm, S., Harding, M., Neumann, V., & Ainsworth, J. D. (2022) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/shti220479 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationSocio-technical consideration for blockchain technology in healthcare
(14753230), M. W., (14753644), K. Y., & Nohr, C. (. (2018) · Figshare · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Property, Agency, and the Blockchain: New Technology, and Longstanding Legal Paradigms
Hughes, S. J. (2019) · bepress Legal Repository · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Davidge, G., Sanders, C., Goulding, R., Morris, R., Atherton, H., Mold, F., & McMillan, B. (2020) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp20x711245 · Cited by 1 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Therefore, there is a further need to recognise the role of patients as data subjects and to examine public perceptions of the social and ethical ramifications of introducing DLT within health data sharing eco-systems [6, 7].”
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [41]Soliman J, Kan M. Grounded theory and NVivo: wars and wins. In: International Conference on Qualitative Research in IT & IT in Qualitative Research. QualIT2004; 2004. p. 9.
- [43]Jackson O. Is it possible to comply with GDPR using blockchain? International Financial Law Review; London. 2018.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Federated learning meets blockchain in decentralized data-sharing: Healthcare use case
Alsamhi, S. H., Myrzashova, R., Hawbani, A., Kumar, S., Srivastava, S., Zhao, L., Wei, X., Guizan, M., & Curry, E. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3367249 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
“In addition, decentralized data sharing offers several benefits, such as increased privacy and security, improved data ownership and control, and enhanced transparency and accountability [8].”
BackgroundRamos, S., & Ellul, J. (2024) · International Cybersecurity Law Review · doi:10.1365/s43439-023-00107-9 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“Decentralised data sharing can support these ethical considerations by enabling collective decision-making, facilitating consensus, and transparent governance models [36].”
Empowering Dataspace 4.0: Unveiling Promise of Decentralized Data-Sharing
Alsamhi, S. H., Hawbani, A., Kumar, S., Timilsina, M., Al-Qatf, M., Haque, R., Nashwan, F., Zhao, L., & Curry, E. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3442968 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“…to systems, DDS provides control and management of data, increased privacy, and security measures, as well as enhanced levels of accountability, accessibility, and transparency through the distribution of data across multiple nodes without the reliance on a central authority [17], [18], [19].”
BackgroundDAOing It as a Collective: Designing the Future of Decentralised Personal Health Data Sharing
Neumann, V., Harding, M., & Davies, N. (2023) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3544549.3585645 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Based on our formative grounding of DAO design elements and our previous research in the area of blockchain and health, including qualitative focus groups [37], we developed a series of materials including pre-activity information packs, a deck of feature cards and a series of workshop tasks.”
MethodSelf-citationCunningham, J. A., Davies, N., Devaney, S., Harding, M., Holm, S., Neumann, V., & Ainsworth, J. D. (2025) · Digital Business · doi:10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100112 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationCunningham, J. A., Davies, N., Devaney, S., Harding, M., Holm, S., Neumann, V., Smith, C., & Ainsworth, J. D. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/63575 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Stakeholder consultations addressed technical intricacies, legal implications, societal concerns, and ethical considerations [46].”
InfluentialSelf-citationCunningham, J. A., Davies, N., Devaney, S., Harding, M., Holm, S., Neumann, V., Smith, C., & Ainsworth, J. D. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.63575
Self-citationConsent, Legal Certainty and the Need for Governance
Bartlett, B., Bowden, C., Devaney, S., & Holm, S. (2025) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2025.2470683
“In the following we will briefly discuss two ethico-legal issues that are raised by the proposed model, based on our own research on blockchain enabled consent for health data sharing and on data trusts (Bartlett et al. 2024, Cunningham et al. 2021, 2022, Neumann et al. 2023, Redhead et al. 2025).”
Self-citationSyangtan, G., Manandhar, S., Bhattarai, M., Shah, B., Singh, M., Rayamajhee, B., & Adhikari, A. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0336389
“While the benefits of data sharing are undeniable, the process of transferring data on a global scale presents various challenges, which require standardized guidelines and legal frameworks to address effectively [9,16].”
- Authors
- Neumann, V., Davidge, G., Harding, M., Cunningham, J., Davies, N., Devaney, S., Leeming, G., Holm, S., & Ainsworth, J.
- Affiliations
- Lancaster University (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Neumann, Victoria
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2023-03-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e0282257
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9980819
- OpenAlex
- W4322757212
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/S02770X/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Thoreau and American Literature
- Keywords
- distributed ledger technology, blockchain, public attitudes, personal health data, audit trail, health data literacy, health disparities, digital inequality, data intermediaries, patient data control, health informatics
- MeSH terms
- Literacy, Blockchain, Humans, Prospective Studies, Focus Groups, Information Dissemination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review