Cited by 10Language Development and DisordersVoice and Speech DisordersStuttering Research and Treatment

What works, how and in which contexts when using digital health to support parents/carers to implement intensive speech and language therapy at home for children with speech sound disorder? A realist review

Open access
Leafe, Naomi, Pagnamenta, Emma, Taggart, Laurence, Donnelly, Mark, Hassiotis, Angela, Titterington, Jill·2025·PLOS One

Abstract

Purpose: Digital health solutions to support parent-implemented interventions alongside direct speech and language therapist (SLT) input could help increase intervention intensity for children with speech sound disorder (SSD) to meet evidence-based recommendations. This realist review explores the factors which could make intensive parent-implemented digital interventions for children with SSD effective, and how this complex intervention might work in different contexts. Methods: Realist review methodology was adopted to explore what works, why, how, for which parents/carers, and in what circumstances. Realist methods aimed to understand the active ingredients, contexts, and associated outcomes of this complex intervention. Preliminary theories were developed to describe how and why digital parent-implemented interventions work for children with SSD. Data was extracted from 43 papers to test and refine preliminary theories. Behaviour change theories were used to explain how the intervention works in practice. Results: A set of 20 explanatory theories were developed to depict how and why digital parent-implemented interventions work in different contexts. Theories covered five areas: child-participation; the child-parent-SLT dynamic; parent-training; partnership and collaboration; intervention intensity. The theories describe mechanisms of the intervention and how these are responded to in different situations. Findings highlight the importance of intensive intervention for children with SSD. Conclusions: This realist review adds new in-depth insight into how digital parent-implemented interventions work, for whom, and why. This new understanding has potential to support future successful digital parent-implemented interventions and increase intervention intensity for children with SSD globally. Implications for services and the potential of emerging digital health approaches to promote parent-implemented interventions are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0321647

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [47]Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist synthesis-an introduction. ESRC res methods program. 2004;2:55.
  2. [49]Hunter R, Gorely T, Beattie M, Harris K. Realist review. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2022; 0(0): 1– 24
  3. [73]Hodge M, Gaines R. Pilot implementation of an alternate service delivery model for young children with severe speech and expressive language delay. Can J Speech-Language Pathol Audiol. 2017; 41(1): 34– 57.
  4. [94]Leafe N, Pagnamenta E, Taggart L, Donnelly M, Hassiotis A, Titterington J. Using digital health to support home implemented speech and language therapy [dataset]. Ulster University. 2025. doi: 10.21251/2b0e8c5c-f334-4090-a682-56cd71c75ab4 PMC12057862 40333949 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leafe, N., Pagnamenta, E., Taggart, L., Donnelly, M., Hassiotis, A., & Titterington, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Leafe, Naomi
Venue
PLOS One
Published
2025-05-07
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
e0321647
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410153156
Cited by
10
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Department for the Economy, Northern Ireland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
Keywords
speech sound disorders, digital health interventions, intensive intervention, children, behaviour change theory, parent training, children's participation, parent-therapist collaboration, intervention intensity, complex interventions
MeSH terms
Digital Health, Child, Humans, Language Therapy, Parents, Speech Therapy, Caregivers, Speech Sound Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review