Cited by 118Survey Methodology and NonresponseGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyEthics in Clinical Research

The Norwegian Institute of Public Health Twin Study of Mental Health: Examining Recruitment and Attrition Bias

Open access
Tambs, Kristian, Rønning, Torbjørn, Prescott, C. A., Kendler, Kenneth S., Reichborn-Kjennerud, Ted, Torgersen, Svenn, Harris, Jennifer R.·2009·Twin Research and Human Genetics

Abstract

All Norwegian twin pairs born 1967–1974 and still living in Norway in 1992 were invited to a health questionnaire study (Q1). 2,570 pairs (65%) participated. These cohorts and the twin cohorts born 1967–1979 were invited to a new questionnaire study (Q2) in 1998. This time 3,334 pairs (53%) participated. Almost all pairs having participated in the 1998 study were invited to an interview study of mental health (MHS), taking place 1999–2004. 1,391 complete pairs (44%) participated. The questionnaire studies included extensive data on somatic health with fewer items on mental health and demography. Health-related and demographic information available from the Medical Birth Registry on all invited twins was applied to predict participation to the first study. A few registry variables indicating poor health predicted nonparticipation in Q1. Health information and demography from Q1 were tested as predictors of participation in the follow-up study (Q2). Monozygosity, female sex, being unmarried, having no children, and high education predicted participation, whereas few indicators of poor mental and somatic health and unhealthy lifestyle moderately predicted nonparticipation in Q2. No health indicators reported in Q2 predicted further participation. Standard genetic twin analyses of indicators of various mental disorders from Q2, validated by diagnostic data from the MHS, did not indicate differences in genetic/environmental covariance structures between participants and nonparticipants in MHS. In general the results show a moderate selection towards good mental and somatic health. Attrition from Q2 to the MHS does not appear to affect twin analyses of mental health related variables.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1375/twin.12.2.158

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tambs, K., Rønning, T., Prescott, C. A., Kendler, K. S., Reichborn-Kjennerud, T., Torgersen, S., & Harris, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Tambs, Kristian
Venue
Twin Research and Human Genetics
Published
2009-04-01
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
158-168
ISSN
  • 1832-4274 (ISSN-L)
  • 1839-2628
OpenAlex
W2068331313
Cited by
118
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
26.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Twin Research and Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • EkstraStiftelsen Helse og Rehabilitering (Stiftelsen Dam)
  • European Commission (QLG2-CT-2002-01254, 01254)
  • Norges Forskningsråd (MH-068643)
  • National Institutes of Health (QLG2-CT-2002-01254)
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-068643, R01MH068643)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
twin studies, mental health, recruitment bias, attrition bias, selection bias, physical health, lifestyle factors, genetic covariance, environmental covariance, mental illness
MeSH terms
Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Patient Participation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Twins, Health Behavior, Bias, Twin Studies as Topic, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review