Cited by 61Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesHealthcare Policy and ManagementEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Advance Care Planning For Medicare Beneficiaries Increased Substantially, But Prevalence Remained Low: Study examines Medicare outpatient advance care planning claims and prevalence.

Palmer, Makayla K., Jacobson, Mireille, Enguidanos, Susan·2021·Health Affairs

Abstract

In 2016 fee-for-service Medicare began reimbursing physicians for advance care planning conversations with enrollees during outpatient visits and waived the copayment for advance care planning when it was part of the Medicare annual wellness visit. Advance care planning is intended to help providers treat patients in ways consistent with their wishes and may also reduce unnecessary health care use and spending. Examining fee-for-service Medicare claims, we found a substantial increase in outpatient advance care planning claims between 2016 and 2019, although prevalence remained below 7.5 percent for all patient subgroups analyzed. Roughly half of beneficiaries with advance care planning claims received the service at an annual wellness visit; the remainder received it at a different outpatient visit. Among those with claims, Black, Hispanic, and Medicaid dual-eligible patients and patients with comorbidities were less likely to have a claim at an annual wellness visit, largely because they have fewer such visits overall. Medicare's annual wellness visits offer the potential to expand enrollees' access to advance care planning at no expense to them, in advance of serious illness, and to populations less likely to undertake advance care planning generally.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01895

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2017, less than 3% of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries had at least one claim for advance care planning.

    “In 2017, less than 3% of fee‐for‐service Medicare beneficiaries had at least one claim for advance care planning. 940”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [940]

  • Medicare beneficiaries with newly diagnosed Alzheimer's were 1.3 times as likely to have one or more claims for advance care planning compared with individuals without newly diagnosed conditions.

    “However, compared with individuals without newly diagnosed conditions, Medicare beneficiaries with newly diagnosed Alzheimer's were 1.3 times as likely to have one or more claims for advance care planning.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [940]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palmer, M. K., Jacobson, M., & Enguidanos, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2021-04-01
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
613-621
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W3151638068
Cited by
61
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
advance care planning, Medicare, fee-for-service Medicare, annual wellness visit, physician reimbursement, Medicaid dual eligibility, racial and ethnic disparities, comorbidities, outpatient visits, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Aged, Medicare, Humans, Medicaid, United States, Prevalence, Fee-for-Service Plans, Advance Care Planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review