Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for the Air-Trapping Asthmatic Phenotype as Measured by Quantitative CT Analysis

Open access
Busacker, Ashley, Newell, John D., Keefe, Thomas, Hoffman, Eric A., Granroth, Janice Cook, Castro, Mario, Fain, Sean, Wenzel, Sally·2009·Chest

Abstract

Background Severe asthma subjects have increased physiologically measured air trapping. However, a similar study using CT measures of air trapping has not been performed. This study was designed to address two hypotheses: 1) air trapping, measured by multi-detector CT quantitative methodology, would be a predictor of a more severe asthma phenotype; and 2) historical, clinical, allergic, or inflammatory risk factors could be identified via multivariate analysis. Methods Multi-detector CT scanning of a subset of the Severe Asthma Research Program subjects was performed at functional residual capacity. Air trapping was defined as 9.66% or more of the lung tissue less than −850 HU. Subjects who were defined as air trappers were then compared to non-trappers on clinical and demographic factors using both univariate and multivariate statistical analysis. Results Air trappers were significantly more likely to have a history of asthma-related hospitalizations, ICU visits and/or mechanical ventilation. Duration of asthma (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.08–1.87), history of pneumonia (OR 8.55, 95% CI 2.07–35.26), high levels of airway neutrophils (OR 8.67, 95% CI 2.05–36.57), air flow obstruction (FEV1/FVC) (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.21–2.14) and atopy (OR 11.54, 95% CI 1.97–67.70), were identified as independent risk factors associated with the air trapping phenotype. Conclusions Quantitative CT determined air trapping in asthmatic subjects identifies a group of individuals with a high risk of severe disease. Several independent risk factors for the presence of this phenotype were identified, perhaps most interestingly history of pneumonia, neutrophilic inflammation, and atopy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.08-0049

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Busacker, A., Newell, J. D., Keefe, T., Hoffman, E. A., Granroth, J. C., Castro, M., Fain, S., & Wenzel, S.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
135
Issue
1
Pages
48-56
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127666096
Cited by
287
References
33
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for the Air-Trapping Asthmatic Phenotype as Measured by Quantitative CT Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1378/chest.08-0049
The paper
Busacker, A., Newell, J. D., Keefe, T., Hoffman, E. A., Granroth, J. C., Castro, M., Fain, S., & Wenzel, S. (2009). A Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for the Air-Trapping Asthmatic Phenotype as Measured by Quantitative CT Analysis. Chest. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-0049

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.