Cited by 497Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchCardiac Health and Mental Health

Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Increases Baroreflex Gain and Peak Expiratory Flow

Lehrer, Paul M., Vaschillo, Evgeny, Vaschillo, Bronya, Lu, Shou-En, Eckberg, Dwain L., Edelberg, Robert, Shih, Weichung Joe, Lin, Yong +3 more·2003·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

Objective We evaluated heart rate variability biofeedback as a method for increasing vagal baroreflex gain and improving pulmonary function among 54 healthy adults. Methods We compared 10 sessions of biofeedback training with an uninstructed control. Cognitive and physiological effects were measured in four of the sessions. Results We found acute increases in low-frequency and total spectrum heart rate variability, and in vagal baroreflex gain, correlated with slow breathing during biofeedback periods. Increased baseline baroreflex gain also occurred across sessions in the biofeedback group, independent of respiratory changes, and peak expiratory flow increased in this group, independently of cardiovascular changes. Biofeedback was accompanied by fewer adverse relaxation side effects than the control condition. Conclusions Heart rate variability biofeedback had strong long-term influences on resting baroreflex gain and pulmonary function. It should be examined as a method for treating cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. Also, this study demonstrates neuroplasticity of the baroreflex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.psy.0000089200.81962.19

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehrer, P. M., Vaschillo, E., Vaschillo, B., Lu, S.-E., Eckberg, D. L., Edelberg, R., Shih, W. J., Lin, Y., Kuusela, T. A., Tahvanainen, K. U. O., & Hamer, R. M.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2003-09
Volume
65
Issue
5
Pages
796-805
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117814310
Cited by
497
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 23
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL58805, R01HL058805)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
heart rate variability biofeedback, baroreflex gain, vagal baroreflex, peak expiratory flow, lung function, slow-paced breathing, neuroplasticity, autonomic nervous system
MeSH terms
Adult, Biofeedback, Psychology, Blood Pressure, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate, Surveys and Questionnaires, Random Allocation, Relaxation Therapy, Respiration, Vagus Nerve, Baroreflex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review