Cited by 133Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

A Practical Guide to Resonance Frequency Assessment for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback

Open access
Shaffer, Fred, Meehan, Zachary M.·2020·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Heart rate variability (HRV) represents fluctuations in the time intervals between successive heartbeats, which are termed interbeat intervals. HRV is an emergent property of complex cardiac-brain interactions and non-linear autonomic nervous system (ANS) processes. A healthy heart is not a metronome because it exhibits complex non-linear oscillations characterized by mathematical chaos. HRV biofeedback displays both heart rate and frequently, respiration, to individuals who can then adjust their physiology to improve affective, cognitive, and cardiovascular functioning. The central premise of the HRV biofeedback resonance frequency model is that the adult cardiorespiratory system has a fixed resonance frequency. Stimulation at rates near the resonance frequency produces large-amplitude blood pressure oscillations that can increase baroreflex sensitivity over time. The authors explain the rationale for the resonance frequency model and provide detailed instructions on how to monitor and assess the resonance frequency. They caution that patterns of physiological change must be compared across several breathing rates to evaluate candidate resonance frequencies. They describe how to fine-tune the resonance frequency following an initial assessment. Furthermore, the authors critically assess the minimum epochs required to measure key HRV indices, resonance frequency test-retest reliability, and whether rhythmic skeletal muscle tension can replace slow paced breathing in resonance frequency assessment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2020.570400

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The blinding of data analysts for the DURING category is often compromised due to the obvious graphical display of voluntary slow breathing compared to control conditions, depicting typical sinusoidal oscillations.

    “The blinding of data analysts for the DURING category is often compromised due to the obvious graphical display of voluntary slow breathing compared to control conditions, depicting typical sinusoidal oscillations (Shaffer & Meehan, 2020).”

    From Effects of voluntary slow breathing on heart rate and heart rate variability: A systematic review and a meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Shaffer & Meehan, 2020

    The Resonance Frequency Trials section (page not given) shows heart-rate and respiration waveforms during paced breathing and lists a sinusoidal waveform as a trial parameter. The paper does not address whether those displays compromise data-analyst blinding or distinguish slow-breathing trials from control conditions. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 85 · Cited by 133

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Akselrod S. Gordon D. Ubel F. A. Shannon D. C. Barger A. C. Cohen R. J. (1981). Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: aquantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. Science 213 220– 222. 10.1126/science.6166045 6166045 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Allen J. (2019). Quantifying the delays between multi-site photoplethysmography pulse and electrocardiogram R-R interval changes under slow-paced breathing. Front. Physiol. 10: 1190. 10.3389/fphys.2019.01190 31607946 PMC6774289 · DOI
  3. Başar E. (1998). “ Resonance phenomena in the brain, physical systems, and nature,” in Brain Functions and Oscillations, ed. Başar E. (Berlin: Springer Verlag). 10.1007/978-3-642-72192-2 · DOI
  4. Beckers F. Verheyden B. Aubert A. E. (2006). Aging and nonlinear heart rate control in a healthy population. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 290 H2560– H2570. 10.1152/ajpheart.00903.2005 16373585 · DOI
  5. Berkoff D. J. Cairns C. B. Sanchez L. D. Moorman C. T. (2007). Heart rate variability in elite American track-and-field athletes. J. Strength Cond. Res. 21 227– 231. 10.1519/00124278-200702000-00041 17313294 · DOI
  6. Bernardi L. Valle F. Coco M. Calciati A. Sleight P. (1996). Physical activity influences heart rate variability and very-low-frequency components in Holter electrocardiograms. Cardiovasc. Res. 32 234– 237. 10.1016/0008-6363(96)00081-8 8796109 · DOI
  7. Buchheit M. (2010). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia and pulmonary gas exchange efficiency: time for a reappraisal. Exp. Physiol. 95: 767. 10.1113/expphysiol.2010.053470 20554926 · DOI
  8. Byrd D. L. Reuther E. T. McNamara J. P. H. DeLucca T. L. Berg W. K. (2015). Age differences in high frequency phasic heart rate variability and performance response to increased executive function load in three executive function tasks. Front. Psychol. 5: 1470. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01470 25798113 PMC4350398 · DOI
  9. Cipresso P. Colombo D. Riva G. (2019). Computational psychometrics using psychophysiological measures for the assessment of acute mental stress. Sensors 19: 781. 10.3390/s19040781 30769812 PMC6412878 · DOI
  10. Cooke W. H. Cox J. F. Diedrich A. M. Taylor J. A. Beightol L. A. Ames J. E. (1998). Controlled breathing protocols probe human autonomic cardiovascular rhythms. Am. J. Physiol. 274 H709– H718. 10.1152/ajpheart.1998.274.2.H709 9486278 · DOI
  11. Cullins S. W. Gevirtz R. N. Poeltler D. M. Cousins L. M. Harpin R. Muench F. (2013). An exploratory analysis of the utility of adding cardiorespiratory biofeedback in the standard care of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 38 161– 170. 10.1007/s10484-013-9219-4 23613006 · DOI
  12. Cutsforth-Gregory J. K. Benarroch E. E. (2017). Nucleus of the solitary tract, medullary reflexes, and clinical implications. Neurology 88 1187– 1196. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003751 28202704 · DOI
  13. Eckberg D. L. (1983). Human sinus arrhythmia as an index of vagal cardiac outflow. J. Appl. Physiol. Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 54 961– 966. 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.4.961 6853303 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Eckberg D. L. Eckberg M. J. (1982). Human sinus node responses to repetitive, ramped carotid baroreceptor stimuli. Am. J. Physiol. 242 H638– H644. 10.1152/ajpheart.1982.242.4.H638 7065276 · DOI
  15. Fox S. I. Rompolski K. (2019). Human Physiology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
  16. Gevirtz R. (2013). The promise of heart rate variability biofeedback: evidence-based applications. Biofeedback 41 110– 120. 10.5298/1081-5937-41.3.01 · DOI
  17. Gevirtz R. N. Lehrer P. M. Schwartz M. S. (2016). “ Cardiorespiratory biofeedback,” in Biofeedback: A Practitioner’s Guide, eds Schwartz M. S. Andrasik F. (New York, NY: The Guilford Press), 196– 213.
  18. Giardino N. D. Lehrer P. M. Edelberg R. (2002). Comparison of finger plethysmograph to ECG in the measurement of heart rate variability. Psychophysiology 39 246– 253. 10.1111/1469-8986.3920246 12212675 · DOI
  19. Goldberger A. L. (1991). Is the normal heartbeat chaotic or homeostatic? News Physiol. Sci. 6 87– 91. 10.1152/physiologyonline.1991.6.2.87 11537649 · DOI
  20. Goldstein D. S. Bentho O. Park M. Y. Sharabi Y. (2011). Low frequency power of heart rate variability is not a measure of cardiac sympathetic tone but may be a measure of modulation of cardiac autonomic outflows by baroreflexes. Exp. Physiol. 96 1255– 1261. 10.1113/expphysiol.2010.056259 21890520 PMC3224799 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Grossman P. Taylor E. W. (2007). Toward understanding respiratory sinus arrhythmia: relations to cardiac vagal tone, evolution and biobehavioral functions. Biol. Psychol. 74 263– 285. 10.1016/j.biopsy 17081672 · DOI
  22. Jan H. Y. Chen M. F. Fu T. C. Lin W. C. Tsai C. L. Lin K. P. (2019). Evaluation of coherence between ECG and PPG derived parameters on heart rate variability and respiration in healthy volunteers with/without controlled breathing. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 39 783– 795. 10.1007/s40846-019-00468-9 · DOI
  23. Karemaker J. M. (2009). Counterpoint: respiratory sinus arrhythmia is due to the baroreflex mechanism. J. Appl. Psychol. 106 1742– 1743. 10.1152/japplphysiol.91107.2008a 19414625 · DOI
  24. Khazan I. (2019a). Biofeedback and Mindfulness in Everyday Life: Practical Solutions for Improving Your Health and Performance. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company. 36269523
  25. Khazan I. Z. (2013). The Clinical Handbook of Biofeedback: A Step-By-Step Guide for Training and Practice with Mindfulness. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell 10.1002/9781118485309 · DOI
  26. Koenig J. Thayer J. F. (2016). Sex differences in healthy human heart rate variability: a meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 64 288– 310. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.007 26964804 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Koh J. Brown T. E. Beightol L. A. Eckberg D. L. (1998). Contributions of tidal lung inflation to human R-R interval and arterial pressure fluctuations. J. Auton. Nerv. Syst. 68 89– 95. 10.1016/s0165-1838(97)00114-8 9531448 · DOI
  28. Kollai M. Mizsei G. (1990). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia is a limited measure of cardiac parasympathetic control in man. J. Physiol. 434 329– 342. 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018070 2391653 PMC1189816 · DOI
  29. Kougias P. Weakley S. M. Yao Q. Lin P. H. Chen C. (2010). Arterial baroreceptors in the management of systemic hypertension. Med. Sci. Monit. 16 RA1– RA8. 20037502 PMC2921195
  30. Laborde S. Mosley E. Mertgen A. (2018). Vagal tank theory: the three Rs of cardiac vagal control functioning – resting, reactivity, and recovery. Front. Neursci. 12: 458. 10.3389/fnins.2018.00458 30042653 PMC6048243 · DOI
  31. Lehrer P. (2013). How does heart rate variability biofeedback work? resonance, the baroreflex, and other mechanisms. Biofeedback 41 26– 31. 10.5298/1081-5937-41.1.02 · DOI
  32. Lehrer P. Eddie D. (2013). Dynamic processes in regulation and some implications for biofeedback and biobehavioral interventions. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 38 143– 155. 10.1007/s10484-013-9217-6 23572244 PMC3699855 · DOI
  33. Lehrer P. Vaschillo B. Zucker T. Graves J. Katsamanis M. Aviles M. (2013). Protocol for heart rate variability biofeedback training. Biofeedback 41 98– 109. 10.5298/1081-5937-41.3.08 · DOI
  34. Lehrer P. M. Gevirtz R. (2014). Heart rate variability: How and why does it work? Front. Psychol. 5: 756. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00756 25101026 PMC4104929 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Lehrer P. M. Vaschillo E. Vaschillo B. Lu S.-E. Eckberg D. L. Edelberg R. (2003). Heart rate variability biofeedback increases baroreflex gain and peak expiratory flow. Psychosom. Med. 65 796– 805. 10.1097/01.PSY.0000089200.81962.19 14508023 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Lehrer P. M. Vaschillo E. Vidali V. (2020b). Heart rate and breathing are not always in phase during resonance frequency breathing. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 45 145– 152. 10.1007/s10484-020-09459-y 32285231 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Lin G. Xiang Q. Fu X. Wang S. Wang S. Chen S. (2012). Heart rate variability biofeedback decreases blood pressure in prehypertensive subjects by improving autonomic function and baroreflex. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 18 143– 152. 10.1089/acm.2010.0607 22339103 · DOI
  38. Mather M. Thayer J. (2018). How heart rate variability affects emotion regulation brain networks. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 19 98– 104. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.12.017 29333483 PMC5761738 · DOI
  39. Meehan Z. Muesenfechter N. Gravett N. Watson T. Smith A. Shearman S. (2017). A 1:2 inhalation-to-exhalation ratio does not increase heart rate variability during 6-bpm breathing [Abstract]. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 45 110– 111. 10.1007/s10484-018-9390-8 29541903 · DOI
  40. Nunan D. Sandercock G. R. H. Brodie D. A. (2010). A quantitative systematic review of normal values for short-term heart rate variability in healthy adults. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 33 1407– 1417. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02841.x 20663071 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Peltola M. A. (2012). Role of editing of R–R intervals in the analysis of heart rate variability. Front. Physiol. 3: 148. 10.3389/fphys.2012.00148 22654764 PMC3358711 · DOI
  42. Penttilä J. Helminen A. Jartti T. Kuusela T. Huikuri H. V. Tulppo M. P. (2001). Time domain, geometrical and frequency domain analysis of cardiac vagal outflow: effects of various respiratory patterns. Clin. Physiol. 21, 365– 376. 10.1046/j.1365-2281.2001.00337.x 11380537 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Pinsky M. R. (2018). Cardiopulmonary interactions: physiological basis and clinical applications. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 15 S45– S48. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-339FR 28820609 PMC5822394 · DOI
  44. Reyes del Paso G. A. Langewitz W. Mulder L. J. M. Van Roon A. Duschek S. (2013). The utility of low frequency heart rate variability as an index of sympathetic cardiac tone: a review with emphasis on a reanalysis of previous studies. Psychophysiology 50 477– 487. 10.1111/psyp.12027 23445494 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Sakakibara M. Kaneda M. Oikawa L. O. (2020). Efficacy of paced breathing at the low-frequency peak on heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 45 31– 37. 10.1007/s10484-019-09453-z 31781925 · DOI
  46. Segerstrom S. C. Ness L. S. (2007). Heart rate variability reflects self-regulatory strength, effort, and fatigue. Psychol. Sci. 18 275– 281. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01888.x 17444926 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Shaffer F. (2020). Resonance frequency assessment: the challenge of standardizing heart rate variability biofeedback research. Biofeedback 48 7– 15. 10.5298/1081-5937-48.01.06 · DOI
  48. Shaffer F. Moss D. (2019). “ Biofeedback,” in Brain and Heart Dynamics, eds Bugada D. Bellini V. Bignami E. G. Lorini L. F. (Cham: Springer), 1– 15.
  49. Shaffer F. Shearman S. Meehan Z. Gravett N. Urban H. (2019). “ The promise of ultra-short-term (UST) heart rate variability measurements: a comparison of Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient and limits of agreement (LoA) concurrent validity criteria,” in Physiological Recording Technology and Applications in Biofeedback and Neurofeedback, eds Moss D. Shaffer F. (Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback), 214– 220.
  50. Steffen P. R. Austin T. DeBarros A. Brown T. (2017). The impact of resonance frequency breathing on measures of heart rate variability, blood pressure, and mood. Front. Public Health 5: 222. 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00222 28890890 PMC5575449 · DOI
  51. Stein P. K. Domitrovich P. P. Hui N. Rautaharju P. Gottfdiener J. (2005). Sometimes higher heart rate variability is not better heart rate variability: results of graphical and nonlinear analyses. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 16 954– 959. 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.40788.x 16174015 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Strauss-Blasche G. Moser M. Voica M. McLeod D. Klammer N. Marktl W. (2000). Relative timing of inspiration and expiration affects respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 27 601– 606. 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2000.03306.x 10901389 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Swenne C. A. (2013). Baroreflex sensitivity: mechanisms and measurement. Neth. Heart J. 21 58– 60. 10.1007/s12471-012-0346-y 23179611 PMC3547418 · DOI
  54. Taha B. H. Simon P. M. Dempsey J. A. Skatrud J. B. Iber C. (1995). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia in humans: an obligatory role for vagal feedback from the lungs. J. Appl. Physiol. 78 638– 645. 10.1152/jappl.1995.78.2.638 7759434 · DOI
  55. Task Force Report. (1996). Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation 93 1043– 1065. 10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.1043 8598068 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Thayer J. F. Ǻhs F. Fredrikson M. Sollers J. J. III Wager T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36 747– 756. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.009 22178086 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Umetani K. Singer D. H. McCraty R. Atkinson M. (1998). Twenty-four hour time domain heart rate variability and heart rate: relations to age and gender over nine decades. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 31 593– 601. 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00554-8 9502641 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Vaillancourt D. E. Newell K. M. (2002). Changing complexity in human behavior and physiology through aging and disease. Neurobiol. Aging 23 1– 11. 10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00247-0 11755010 · DOI
  59. Van Diest I. Verstappen K. Aubert A. E. Widjaja D. Vansteenwegen D. Vlemincx E. (2014). Inhalation/exhalation ratio modulates the effect of slow breathing on heart rate variability and relaxation. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 39 171– 180. 10.1007/s10484-014-9253-x 25156003 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Vaschillo E. Lehrer P. Rishe N. Konstantinov M. (2002). Heart rate variability biofeedback as a method for assessing baroreflex function: a preliminary study of resonance in the cardiovascular system. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 27 1– 27. 10.1023/A:1014587304314 12001882 · DOI
  61. Vaschillo E. G. Vaschillo B. Lehrer P. M. (2004). Heartbeat synchronizes with respiratory rhythm only under specific circumstances. Chest 126 1385– 1386. 10.1016/S0012-3692(15)31329-5 15486413 · DOI
  62. Vaschillo E. G. Vaschillo B. Lehrer P. M. (2006). Characteristics of resonance in heart rate variability stimulated by biofeedback. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 31 129– 142. 10.1007/s10484-006-9009-3 16838124 · DOI
  63. Vaschillo E. G. Vaschillo B. Pandina R. J. Bates M. E. (2011). Resonances in the cardiovascular system caused by rhythmical muscle tension. Psychophysiology 48 927– 936. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01156.x 21143610 PMC3094735 · DOI
  64. Weinschenk S. W. Beise R. D. Lorenz J. (2016). Heart rate variability (HRV) in deep breathing tests and 5-min short-term recordings: agreement of ear photoplethysmography with ECG measurements, in 343 subjects. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 116 1527– 1535. 10.1007/s00421-016-3401-3 27278521 · DOI
  65. Yasuma F. Hayano J. (2004). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: Why does the heartbeat synchronize with respiratory rhythm? Chest 125 638– 690. 10.1378/chest.125.2.683 14769752 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Zautra A. J. Fasman R. Davis M. C. Craig A. D. B. (2010). The effects of slow breathing on affective responses to pain stimuli: an experimental study. Pain 149 12– 18. 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.001 20079569 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Shaffer, F., & Meehan, Z. M.
Affiliations
  • Truman State University (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Shaffer, Fred
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2020-10-08
Volume
14
Pages
570400-570400
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092637813
Cited by
133
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
heart rate variability biofeedback, resonant frequency, autonomic nervous system, baroreflex sensitivity, blood pressure oscillations, RR interval, test-retest reliability, paced breathing, HRV indices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review