A Practical Guide to Resonance Frequency Assessment for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback
Open accessAbstract
Heart rate variability (HRV) represents fluctuations in the time intervals between successive heartbeats, which are termed interbeat intervals. HRV is an emergent property of complex cardiac-brain interactions and non-linear autonomic nervous system (ANS) processes. A healthy heart is not a metronome because it exhibits complex non-linear oscillations characterized by mathematical chaos. HRV biofeedback displays both heart rate and frequently, respiration, to individuals who can then adjust their physiology to improve affective, cognitive, and cardiovascular functioning. The central premise of the HRV biofeedback resonance frequency model is that the adult cardiorespiratory system has a fixed resonance frequency. Stimulation at rates near the resonance frequency produces large-amplitude blood pressure oscillations that can increase baroreflex sensitivity over time. The authors explain the rationale for the resonance frequency model and provide detailed instructions on how to monitor and assess the resonance frequency. They caution that patterns of physiological change must be compared across several breathing rates to evaluate candidate resonance frequencies. They describe how to fine-tune the resonance frequency following an initial assessment. Furthermore, the authors critically assess the minimum epochs required to measure key HRV indices, resonance frequency test-retest reliability, and whether rhythmic skeletal muscle tension can replace slow paced breathing in resonance frequency assessment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The blinding of data analysts for the DURING category is often compromised due to the obvious graphical display of voluntary slow breathing compared to control conditions, depicting typical sinusoidal oscillations.
“The blinding of data analysts for the DURING category is often compromised due to the obvious graphical display of voluntary slow breathing compared to control conditions, depicting typical sinusoidal oscillations (Shaffer & Meehan, 2020).”
From Effects of voluntary slow breathing on heart rate and heart rate variability: A systematic review and a meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Shaffer & Meehan, 2020
The Resonance Frequency Trials section (page not given) shows heart-rate and respiration waveforms during paced breathing and lists a sinusoidal waveform as a trial parameter. The paper does not address whether those displays compromise data-analyst blinding or distinguish slow-breathing trials from control conditions. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 85 · Cited by 133
Research works printed but not linked: 66
- Akselrod S. Gordon D. Ubel F. A. Shannon D. C. Barger A. C. Cohen R. J. (1981). Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: aquantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. Science 213 220– 222. 10.1126/science.6166045 6166045 · DOI · Paper page
- Allen J. (2019). Quantifying the delays between multi-site photoplethysmography pulse and electrocardiogram R-R interval changes under slow-paced breathing. Front. Physiol. 10: 1190. 10.3389/fphys.2019.01190 31607946 PMC6774289 · DOI
- Başar E. (1998). “ Resonance phenomena in the brain, physical systems, and nature,” in Brain Functions and Oscillations, ed. Başar E. (Berlin: Springer Verlag). 10.1007/978-3-642-72192-2 · DOI
- Beckers F. Verheyden B. Aubert A. E. (2006). Aging and nonlinear heart rate control in a healthy population. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 290 H2560– H2570. 10.1152/ajpheart.00903.2005 16373585 · DOI
- Berkoff D. J. Cairns C. B. Sanchez L. D. Moorman C. T. (2007). Heart rate variability in elite American track-and-field athletes. J. Strength Cond. Res. 21 227– 231. 10.1519/00124278-200702000-00041 17313294 · DOI
- Bernardi L. Valle F. Coco M. Calciati A. Sleight P. (1996). Physical activity influences heart rate variability and very-low-frequency components in Holter electrocardiograms. Cardiovasc. Res. 32 234– 237. 10.1016/0008-6363(96)00081-8 8796109 · DOI
- Buchheit M. (2010). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia and pulmonary gas exchange efficiency: time for a reappraisal. Exp. Physiol. 95: 767. 10.1113/expphysiol.2010.053470 20554926 · DOI
- Byrd D. L. Reuther E. T. McNamara J. P. H. DeLucca T. L. Berg W. K. (2015). Age differences in high frequency phasic heart rate variability and performance response to increased executive function load in three executive function tasks. Front. Psychol. 5: 1470. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01470 25798113 PMC4350398 · DOI
- Cipresso P. Colombo D. Riva G. (2019). Computational psychometrics using psychophysiological measures for the assessment of acute mental stress. Sensors 19: 781. 10.3390/s19040781 30769812 PMC6412878 · DOI
- Cooke W. H. Cox J. F. Diedrich A. M. Taylor J. A. Beightol L. A. Ames J. E. (1998). Controlled breathing protocols probe human autonomic cardiovascular rhythms. Am. J. Physiol. 274 H709– H718. 10.1152/ajpheart.1998.274.2.H709 9486278 · DOI
- Cullins S. W. Gevirtz R. N. Poeltler D. M. Cousins L. M. Harpin R. Muench F. (2013). An exploratory analysis of the utility of adding cardiorespiratory biofeedback in the standard care of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 38 161– 170. 10.1007/s10484-013-9219-4 23613006 · DOI
- Cutsforth-Gregory J. K. Benarroch E. E. (2017). Nucleus of the solitary tract, medullary reflexes, and clinical implications. Neurology 88 1187– 1196. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003751 28202704 · DOI
- Eckberg D. L. (1983). Human sinus arrhythmia as an index of vagal cardiac outflow. J. Appl. Physiol. Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 54 961– 966. 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.4.961 6853303 · DOI · Paper page
- Eckberg D. L. Eckberg M. J. (1982). Human sinus node responses to repetitive, ramped carotid baroreceptor stimuli. Am. J. Physiol. 242 H638– H644. 10.1152/ajpheart.1982.242.4.H638 7065276 · DOI
- Fox S. I. Rompolski K. (2019). Human Physiology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
- Gevirtz R. (2013). The promise of heart rate variability biofeedback: evidence-based applications. Biofeedback 41 110– 120. 10.5298/1081-5937-41.3.01 · DOI
- Gevirtz R. N. Lehrer P. M. Schwartz M. S. (2016). “ Cardiorespiratory biofeedback,” in Biofeedback: A Practitioner’s Guide, eds Schwartz M. S. Andrasik F. (New York, NY: The Guilford Press), 196– 213.
- Giardino N. D. Lehrer P. M. Edelberg R. (2002). Comparison of finger plethysmograph to ECG in the measurement of heart rate variability. Psychophysiology 39 246– 253. 10.1111/1469-8986.3920246 12212675 · DOI
- Goldberger A. L. (1991). Is the normal heartbeat chaotic or homeostatic? News Physiol. Sci. 6 87– 91. 10.1152/physiologyonline.1991.6.2.87 11537649 · DOI
- Goldstein D. S. Bentho O. Park M. Y. Sharabi Y. (2011). Low frequency power of heart rate variability is not a measure of cardiac sympathetic tone but may be a measure of modulation of cardiac autonomic outflows by baroreflexes. Exp. Physiol. 96 1255– 1261. 10.1113/expphysiol.2010.056259 21890520 PMC3224799 · DOI · Paper page
- Grossman P. Taylor E. W. (2007). Toward understanding respiratory sinus arrhythmia: relations to cardiac vagal tone, evolution and biobehavioral functions. Biol. Psychol. 74 263– 285. 10.1016/j.biopsy 17081672 · DOI
- Jan H. Y. Chen M. F. Fu T. C. Lin W. C. Tsai C. L. Lin K. P. (2019). Evaluation of coherence between ECG and PPG derived parameters on heart rate variability and respiration in healthy volunteers with/without controlled breathing. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 39 783– 795. 10.1007/s40846-019-00468-9 · DOI
- Karemaker J. M. (2009). Counterpoint: respiratory sinus arrhythmia is due to the baroreflex mechanism. J. Appl. Psychol. 106 1742– 1743. 10.1152/japplphysiol.91107.2008a 19414625 · DOI
- Khazan I. (2019a). Biofeedback and Mindfulness in Everyday Life: Practical Solutions for Improving Your Health and Performance. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company. 36269523
- Khazan I. Z. (2013). The Clinical Handbook of Biofeedback: A Step-By-Step Guide for Training and Practice with Mindfulness. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell 10.1002/9781118485309 · DOI
- Koenig J. Thayer J. F. (2016). Sex differences in healthy human heart rate variability: a meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 64 288– 310. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.007 26964804 · DOI · Paper page
- Koh J. Brown T. E. Beightol L. A. Eckberg D. L. (1998). Contributions of tidal lung inflation to human R-R interval and arterial pressure fluctuations. J. Auton. Nerv. Syst. 68 89– 95. 10.1016/s0165-1838(97)00114-8 9531448 · DOI
- Kollai M. Mizsei G. (1990). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia is a limited measure of cardiac parasympathetic control in man. J. Physiol. 434 329– 342. 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018070 2391653 PMC1189816 · DOI
- Kougias P. Weakley S. M. Yao Q. Lin P. H. Chen C. (2010). Arterial baroreceptors in the management of systemic hypertension. Med. Sci. Monit. 16 RA1– RA8. 20037502 PMC2921195
- Laborde S. Mosley E. Mertgen A. (2018). Vagal tank theory: the three Rs of cardiac vagal control functioning – resting, reactivity, and recovery. Front. Neursci. 12: 458. 10.3389/fnins.2018.00458 30042653 PMC6048243 · DOI
- Lehrer P. (2013). How does heart rate variability biofeedback work? resonance, the baroreflex, and other mechanisms. Biofeedback 41 26– 31. 10.5298/1081-5937-41.1.02 · DOI
- Lehrer P. Eddie D. (2013). Dynamic processes in regulation and some implications for biofeedback and biobehavioral interventions. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 38 143– 155. 10.1007/s10484-013-9217-6 23572244 PMC3699855 · DOI
- Lehrer P. Vaschillo B. Zucker T. Graves J. Katsamanis M. Aviles M. (2013). Protocol for heart rate variability biofeedback training. Biofeedback 41 98– 109. 10.5298/1081-5937-41.3.08 · DOI
- Lehrer P. M. Gevirtz R. (2014). Heart rate variability: How and why does it work? Front. Psychol. 5: 756. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00756 25101026 PMC4104929 · DOI · Paper page
- Lehrer P. M. Vaschillo E. Vaschillo B. Lu S.-E. Eckberg D. L. Edelberg R. (2003). Heart rate variability biofeedback increases baroreflex gain and peak expiratory flow. Psychosom. Med. 65 796– 805. 10.1097/01.PSY.0000089200.81962.19 14508023 · DOI · Paper page
- Lehrer P. M. Vaschillo E. Vidali V. (2020b). Heart rate and breathing are not always in phase during resonance frequency breathing. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 45 145– 152. 10.1007/s10484-020-09459-y 32285231 · DOI · Paper page
- Lin G. Xiang Q. Fu X. Wang S. Wang S. Chen S. (2012). Heart rate variability biofeedback decreases blood pressure in prehypertensive subjects by improving autonomic function and baroreflex. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 18 143– 152. 10.1089/acm.2010.0607 22339103 · DOI
- Mather M. Thayer J. (2018). How heart rate variability affects emotion regulation brain networks. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 19 98– 104. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.12.017 29333483 PMC5761738 · DOI
- Meehan Z. Muesenfechter N. Gravett N. Watson T. Smith A. Shearman S. (2017). A 1:2 inhalation-to-exhalation ratio does not increase heart rate variability during 6-bpm breathing [Abstract]. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 45 110– 111. 10.1007/s10484-018-9390-8 29541903 · DOI
- Nunan D. Sandercock G. R. H. Brodie D. A. (2010). A quantitative systematic review of normal values for short-term heart rate variability in healthy adults. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 33 1407– 1417. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02841.x 20663071 · DOI · Paper page
- Peltola M. A. (2012). Role of editing of R–R intervals in the analysis of heart rate variability. Front. Physiol. 3: 148. 10.3389/fphys.2012.00148 22654764 PMC3358711 · DOI
- Penttilä J. Helminen A. Jartti T. Kuusela T. Huikuri H. V. Tulppo M. P. (2001). Time domain, geometrical and frequency domain analysis of cardiac vagal outflow: effects of various respiratory patterns. Clin. Physiol. 21, 365– 376. 10.1046/j.1365-2281.2001.00337.x 11380537 · DOI · Paper page
- Pinsky M. R. (2018). Cardiopulmonary interactions: physiological basis and clinical applications. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 15 S45– S48. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-339FR 28820609 PMC5822394 · DOI
- Reyes del Paso G. A. Langewitz W. Mulder L. J. M. Van Roon A. Duschek S. (2013). The utility of low frequency heart rate variability as an index of sympathetic cardiac tone: a review with emphasis on a reanalysis of previous studies. Psychophysiology 50 477– 487. 10.1111/psyp.12027 23445494 · DOI · Paper page
- Sakakibara M. Kaneda M. Oikawa L. O. (2020). Efficacy of paced breathing at the low-frequency peak on heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 45 31– 37. 10.1007/s10484-019-09453-z 31781925 · DOI
- Segerstrom S. C. Ness L. S. (2007). Heart rate variability reflects self-regulatory strength, effort, and fatigue. Psychol. Sci. 18 275– 281. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01888.x 17444926 · DOI · Paper page
- Shaffer F. (2020). Resonance frequency assessment: the challenge of standardizing heart rate variability biofeedback research. Biofeedback 48 7– 15. 10.5298/1081-5937-48.01.06 · DOI
- Shaffer F. Moss D. (2019). “ Biofeedback,” in Brain and Heart Dynamics, eds Bugada D. Bellini V. Bignami E. G. Lorini L. F. (Cham: Springer), 1– 15.
- Shaffer F. Shearman S. Meehan Z. Gravett N. Urban H. (2019). “ The promise of ultra-short-term (UST) heart rate variability measurements: a comparison of Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient and limits of agreement (LoA) concurrent validity criteria,” in Physiological Recording Technology and Applications in Biofeedback and Neurofeedback, eds Moss D. Shaffer F. (Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback), 214– 220.
- Steffen P. R. Austin T. DeBarros A. Brown T. (2017). The impact of resonance frequency breathing on measures of heart rate variability, blood pressure, and mood. Front. Public Health 5: 222. 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00222 28890890 PMC5575449 · DOI
- Stein P. K. Domitrovich P. P. Hui N. Rautaharju P. Gottfdiener J. (2005). Sometimes higher heart rate variability is not better heart rate variability: results of graphical and nonlinear analyses. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 16 954– 959. 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.40788.x 16174015 · DOI · Paper page
- Strauss-Blasche G. Moser M. Voica M. McLeod D. Klammer N. Marktl W. (2000). Relative timing of inspiration and expiration affects respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 27 601– 606. 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2000.03306.x 10901389 · DOI · Paper page
- Swenne C. A. (2013). Baroreflex sensitivity: mechanisms and measurement. Neth. Heart J. 21 58– 60. 10.1007/s12471-012-0346-y 23179611 PMC3547418 · DOI
- Taha B. H. Simon P. M. Dempsey J. A. Skatrud J. B. Iber C. (1995). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia in humans: an obligatory role for vagal feedback from the lungs. J. Appl. Physiol. 78 638– 645. 10.1152/jappl.1995.78.2.638 7759434 · DOI
- Task Force Report. (1996). Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation 93 1043– 1065. 10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.1043 8598068 · DOI · Paper page
- Thayer J. F. Ǻhs F. Fredrikson M. Sollers J. J. III Wager T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36 747– 756. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.009 22178086 · DOI · Paper page
- Umetani K. Singer D. H. McCraty R. Atkinson M. (1998). Twenty-four hour time domain heart rate variability and heart rate: relations to age and gender over nine decades. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 31 593– 601. 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00554-8 9502641 · DOI · Paper page
- Vaillancourt D. E. Newell K. M. (2002). Changing complexity in human behavior and physiology through aging and disease. Neurobiol. Aging 23 1– 11. 10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00247-0 11755010 · DOI
- Van Diest I. Verstappen K. Aubert A. E. Widjaja D. Vansteenwegen D. Vlemincx E. (2014). Inhalation/exhalation ratio modulates the effect of slow breathing on heart rate variability and relaxation. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 39 171– 180. 10.1007/s10484-014-9253-x 25156003 · DOI · Paper page
- Vaschillo E. Lehrer P. Rishe N. Konstantinov M. (2002). Heart rate variability biofeedback as a method for assessing baroreflex function: a preliminary study of resonance in the cardiovascular system. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 27 1– 27. 10.1023/A:1014587304314 12001882 · DOI
- Vaschillo E. G. Vaschillo B. Lehrer P. M. (2004). Heartbeat synchronizes with respiratory rhythm only under specific circumstances. Chest 126 1385– 1386. 10.1016/S0012-3692(15)31329-5 15486413 · DOI
- Vaschillo E. G. Vaschillo B. Lehrer P. M. (2006). Characteristics of resonance in heart rate variability stimulated by biofeedback. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 31 129– 142. 10.1007/s10484-006-9009-3 16838124 · DOI
- Vaschillo E. G. Vaschillo B. Pandina R. J. Bates M. E. (2011). Resonances in the cardiovascular system caused by rhythmical muscle tension. Psychophysiology 48 927– 936. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01156.x 21143610 PMC3094735 · DOI
- Weinschenk S. W. Beise R. D. Lorenz J. (2016). Heart rate variability (HRV) in deep breathing tests and 5-min short-term recordings: agreement of ear photoplethysmography with ECG measurements, in 343 subjects. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 116 1527– 1535. 10.1007/s00421-016-3401-3 27278521 · DOI
- Yasuma F. Hayano J. (2004). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: Why does the heartbeat synchronize with respiratory rhythm? Chest 125 638– 690. 10.1378/chest.125.2.683 14769752 · DOI · Paper page
- Zautra A. J. Fasman R. Davis M. C. Craig A. D. B. (2010). The effects of slow breathing on affective responses to pain stimuli: an experimental study. Pain 149 12– 18. 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.001 20079569 · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Shaffer, F., & Meehan, Z. M.
- Affiliations
- Truman State University (US)
- University of Delaware (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shaffer, Fred
- ORCID
- Meehan, Zachary M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-10-08
- Volume
- 14
- Pages
- 570400-570400
- ISSN
- 1662-453X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7578229
- OpenAlex
- W3092637813
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- corrigendum (2020-12-01)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Keywords
- heart rate variability biofeedback, resonant frequency, autonomic nervous system, baroreflex sensitivity, blood pressure oscillations, RR interval, test-retest reliability, paced breathing, HRV indices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review