CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 262Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesCardiac Health and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety in Patients with COPD

Light, Richard W., Merrill, Elaine J., Despars, Judith A, Gordon, Geoffrey H., Mutalipassi, Louis R.·1985·Chest
DOI 10.1378/chest.87.1.35
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The objective of this study was twofold: (1) to document the prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; and (2) to determine whether the presence of depression or anxiety adversely affected the functional capabilities of the patient as reflected by the distance he could walk in 12 minutes. Forty-five patients with an FEV1 less than 1,250 ml underwent pulmonary function testing including spirometry, single breath diffusing capacity, and arterial blood gas determinations. The degree of depression was assessed by the Beck depression inventory, while the degree of anxiety was assessed by the State-Trait anxiety inventory. Forty-two percent of the patients had significant depression, while only 2 percent of the patients had significant anxiety. There was a highly significant correlation between the depression scores and the anxiety scores (r = 0.81, p less than 0.001). There was no significant correlation between the level of depression or anxiety and the distance that the patient could walk in 12 minutes. From this study, we conclude that the prevalence of depression in patients with moderate or severe COPD approaches 50 percent while the incidence of anxiety is much lower (2 percent).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.87.1.35

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Mitchell-Heggs, 1980, Diazepam in the treatment ofdyspnoea in the “pink puffer” syndrome, Quart J Med, 49, 9
  2. Cotes, 1970, The transfer factor for the lung; normal values in adults, Ann Intern Med, 72, 627

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Light, R. W., Merrill, E. J., Despars, J. A., Gordon, G. H., & Mutalipassi, L. R.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1985-01
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
35-38
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1378/chest.87.1.35
OpenAlex
W2141678103
Cited by
262
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, anxiety, prevalence, functional capacity, 6-minute walk distance, FEV1
MeSH terms
Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Physical Exertion, Humans, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Lung Volume Measurements, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review