Cited by 430Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationRetinal Development and DisordersOcular Disorders and Treatments

Evolution of eyes and photoreceptor cell types

Open access
Arendt, Detlev·2003·The International Journal of Developmental Biology

Abstract

The evolution of the eye is a matter of debate ever since Darwin's Origin of Species. While morphological comparisons of eye anatomy and photoreceptor cell types led to the view that animal eyes evolved multiple times independently, the molecular conservation of the pax6 eye-specifying cascade has indicated the contrary - that animal eyes evolved from a common, simple precursor, the proto-eye. Morphological and molecular comparative approaches are combined here in a novel Evo-Devo approach, the molecular comparison of cell types ("comparative molecular cell biology"). In the eye, the various types of photoreceptor cells, as well as pigment and lens cells, each require distinct combinations of specifying transcription factors that control their particular differentiation programmes, such as opsin expression in photoreceptors, specific neurotransmitter metabolism, or axonal outgrowth. Comparing the molecular combinatorial codes of cell types of animal extant eyes, their evolutionary histories can be reconstructed. This is exemplified here on the evolution of ciliary and rhabdomeric photoreceptor cells in bilaterian eyes and on the evolution of cell type diversity in the vertebrate retina. I propose that the retinal ganglion, amacrine and horizontal cells are evolutionary sister cell types that evolved from a common rhabdomeric photoreceptor cell precursor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1387/ijdb.14756332

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drosophila eye has 10 different cells, while humans have 400, with parallel development of retinal circuitry.

    “For example, whereas Drosophila melanogaster eye has 10 different cells, that number has grown to 400 in humans, with a parallel development of retinal circuitry.211−215”

    From Chemistry of the Retinoid (Visual) Cycle (2014) · cites this paper as [215]

    The ‘Quest for the proto-eye’ section discusses cell types in insect ommatidia and the vertebrate retina, and ‘Diversification of cell types in the vertebrate retina’ describes further retinal subtypes. Neither section gives the claimed counts of 10 in Drosophila and 400 in humans or describes a parallel development of retinal circuitry (pages unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. ARENDT, D. and WITTBRODT, J. (2001). Reconstructing the eyes of Urbilateria. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 356: 1545-1563.
  2. CALLAERTS, P., MUNOZ-MARMOL, A.M., GLARDON, S., CASTILLO, E., SUN, H., Li, W.H., GEHRING, W.J. and SALO, E. (1999). Isolation and expression of a Pax- 6 gene in the regenerating and intact Planarian Dugesia(G)tigrina. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 558-563.
  3. EAKIN, R.M. (1982). Continuity and diversity in photoreceptors. In "Visual cells in Evolution" (J. A. Westfall, Ed.), pp. 91-105. Raven Press, New York.
  4. EGGERT, T., HAUCK, B., HILDEBRANDT, N., GEHRING, W.J. and WALLDORF, U. (1998). Isolation of a Drosophila homolog of the vertebrate homeobox gene Rx and its possible role in brain and eye development. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 2343- 2348.
  5. GEHRING, W. and ROSBASH, M. (2003). The co-evolution of blue-light photorecep- tion and circadian rhythms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. in press
  6. KAWAKAMI, K., OHTO, H., TAKIZAWA, T. and SAITO, T. (1996). Identification and expression of six family genes in mouse retina. FEBS Letters 393: 259-263.
  7. LIU, W., MO, Z. and XIANG, M. (2001). The Ath5 proneural genes function upstream of Brn3 POU domain transcription factor genes to promote retinal ganglion cell development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 1649-54.
  8. LOOSLI, F., KMITA-CUNISSE, M. and GEHRING, W.J. (1996). Isolation of a Pax-6 homolog from the ribbonworm Lineus sanguineus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 2658-63.
  9. MARTINEZ MORALES, J., SIGNORE, M., ACAMPORA, D., SIMEONE, A. and BOVOLENTA, P. (2000). Otx genes are required for tissue specification in the developing eye Development 128(11): 2019-2030.
  10. MEYER-ROCHOW, V.B. and STEWART, D. (1996). Review of larval and postlarval eye ultrastructure in the lamprey (Cyclostomata) with special emphasis on Geotria australis (Gray). Microsc. Res. Tech. 35: 431-44.
  11. PINEDA, D., GONZALEZ, J., CALLAERTS, P., IKEO, K., GEHRING, W.J. and SALO, E. (2000). Searching for the prototypic eye genetic network: Sine oculis is essential for eye regeneration in planarians. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 4525-4529.
  12. TESSMAR-RAIBLE, K. and ARENDT, D. (2003). Emerging systems: between verte- brates and arthropods, the Lophotrochozoa. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13(4): 331- 340
  13. TOMAREV, S.I., CALLAERTS, P., KOS, L., ZINOVIEVA, R., HALDER, G., GEHRING, W. and Piatigorsky, J. (1997). Squid Pax-6 and eye development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 2421-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arendt, D.
Affiliations
European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
Corresponding author
Arendt, Detlev
Venue
The International Journal of Developmental Biology
Publisher
EHU Press
Published
2003
Volume
47
Issue
7-8
Pages
563-571
ISSN
  • 0214-6282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1696-3547
OpenAlex
W26195142
Cited by
430
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 22
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Ocular Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
eye evolution, photoreceptors, Pax6, ciliary photoreceptors, rhabdomeric photoreceptors, retinal ganglion cells, amacrine cells, horizontal cells, opsin, transcription factors, lens cells, pigment cells, axon growth, vertebrate retina
MeSH terms
PAX6 Transcription Factor, Animals, Eye, Eye Proteins, Models, Biological, Repressor Proteins, Retina, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Genetic Variation, Rod Opsins, Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate, Homeodomain Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, Photoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate, Amacrine Cells, Paired Box Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review