Cited by 139EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Love and enjoyment in context: four case studies of adolescent EFL learners

Open access
Pavelescu, Liana Maria, Petrić, Bojana·2018·Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching

Abstract

This study explores the foreign language learning emotions of four EFL adolescent students in Romania and the ways in which their emotions emerge in their sociocultural context. Multiple qualitative methods were employed over a school semester, including a written task, semi-structured interviews with the learners and their teachers, lesson observations and English-related events outside the classroom. It was found that, while all four participants reported experiencing positive emotions in language learning, a distinction was identified in the intensity and stability of their emotions. Two participants expressed a strong and stable emotion of love towards English, while the other two participants experienced enjoyment in their English language learning without an intense emotional attachment to English. Unlike enjoyment, love was found to be the driving force in the learning process, creating effective coping mechanisms when there was a lack of enjoyment in certain classroom situations and motivating learners to invest greater effort into language learning in and out of the classroom. The findings thus revealed that, unlike enjoyment, love broadened cognition and maintained engagement in learning. The study emphasizes the role of strong, enduring positive emotions in teenage students’ language learning process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.1.4

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pavelescu, L. M., & Petrić, B.
Affiliations
  • Guildford College (GB)
  • Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Venue
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
Published
2018-03-27
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
73-101
ISSN
  • 2083-5205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2084-1965
OpenAlex
W2773076691
Cited by
139
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 3
FWCI
57.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Birkbeck, University of London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
positive emotions, student motivation, coping strategies, student engagement, Romanian adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review