Cited by 154Iron Metabolism and DisordersChild Nutrition and Water AccessPublic Health and Nutrition

Effects of daily iron supplementation in primary-school–aged children: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Low, Michael, Farrell, Ann, Biggs, Beverley-Ann, Pasricha, Sant-Rayn·2013·Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anemia is an important public health and clinical problem. Observational studies have linked iron deficiency and anemia in children with many poor outcomes, including impaired cognitive development; however, iron supplementation, a widely used preventive and therapeutic strategy, is associated with adverse effects. Primary-school-aged children are at a critical stage in intellectual development, and optimization of their cognitive performance could have long-lasting individual and population benefits. In this study, we summarize the evidence for the benefits and safety of daily iron supplementation in primary-school-aged children. METHODS: We searched electronic databases (including MEDLINE and Embase) and other sources (July 2013) for randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials involving daily iron supplementation in children aged 5-12 years. We combined the data using random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: We identified 16 501 studies; of these, we evaluated 76 full-text papers and included 32 studies including 7089 children. Of the included studies, 31 were conducted in low- or middle-income settings. Iron supplementation improved global cognitive scores (standardized mean difference 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11 to 0.90, p = 0.01), intelligence quotient among anemic children (mean difference 4.55, 95% CI 0.16 to 8.94, p = 0.04) and measures of attention and concentration. Iron supplementation also improved age-adjusted height among all children and age-adjusted weight among anemic children. Iron supplementation reduced the risk of anemia by 50% and the risk of iron deficiency by 79%. Adherence in the trial settings was generally high. Safety data were limited. INTERPRETATION: Our analysis suggests that iron supplementation safely improves hematologic and nonhematologic outcomes among primary-school-aged children in low- or middle-income settings and is well-tolerated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/cmaj.130628

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Iron intake is associated with improved cognitive performance.

    “iron intake was associated with improved cognitive performance.45”

    From Critical connections: health and academics (2015) · cites this paper as [45]

  • In a meta-analysis of 32 studies including 7089 children aged 5-12 years, iron supplementation in anemic children significantly improved measures of attention and concentration, global cognitive scores and intelligence quotient.

    “a meta-analysis of 32 studies that included 7089 children aged 5–12 years. Iron supplementation in anemic children significantly improved measures of attention and concentration, global cognitive scores and intelligence quotient [205].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Goswami U, Bryant P. Children's cognitive development and learning: primary review research survey 2/1a. Cambridge (UK): University of Cambridge, Faculty of Education; 2007.
  2. Borenstein M, Hedges L, Rothstein H. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
  3. Gebreselassie H. Iron supplementation and malaria infection: results of a randomized controlled field trial [dissertation]. Montreal (QC): McGill University, 1996.
  4. Taubman P, Wales T. Mental ability and higher education attain- ment in the 20th century. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1972.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Low, M., Farrell, A., Biggs, B.-A., & Pasricha, S.-R.
Affiliations
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
Venue
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Published
2013-10-15
Volume
185
Issue
17
Pages
E791-E802
ISSN
  • 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2329
OpenAlex
W2011497294
Cited by
154
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Medical Association Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Vifor Pharma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
Keywords
iron supplementation, childhood anemia, iron deficiency, primary school-aged children, cognitive development, intelligence quotient, attention and concentration, height and weight, anemia prevention, low- and middle-income settings, supplement safety
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Iron, Schools, Anemia, Iron-Deficiency, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review