Cited by 69Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersVitamin C and Antioxidants Research

Association between Adherence to Recommended Care and Outcomes for Adult Survivors of Sepsis

Open access
Taylor, Stephanie Parks, Chou, Shih-Hsiung, Sierra, Marielys Figueroa, Shuman, Thomas P., McWilliams, Andrew D., Taylor, Brice T., Russo, Mark, Evans, Susan L. +4 more·2020·Annals of the American Thoracic Society

Abstract

Rationale: Postsepsis care recommendations target specific deficits experienced by sepsis survivors in elements such as optimization of medications, screening for functional impairments, monitoring for common and preventable causes of health deterioration, and consideration of palliative care. However, few data are available regarding the application of these elements in clinical practice. Objectives: To quantify the delivery of postsepsis care for patients discharged after hospital admission for sepsis and evaluate the association between receipt of postsepsis care elements and reduced mortality and hospital readmission within 90 days. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of a random sample of patients who were discharged alive after an admission for sepsis (identified from International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision discharge codes) at 10 hospitals during 2017. We used a structured chart abstraction to determine whether four elements of postsepsis care were provided within 90 days of hospital discharge, per expert recommendations. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between receipt of care elements and 90-day hospital readmission and mortality, adjusted for age, comorbidity, length of stay, and discharge disposition. Results: Among 189 sepsis survivors, 117 (62%) had medications optimized, 123 (65%) had screening for functional or mental health impairments, 86 (46%) were monitored for common and preventable causes of health deterioration, and 110 (58%) had care alignment processes documented (i.e., assessed for palliative care or goals of care). Only 20 (11%) received all four care elements within 90 days. Within 90 days of discharge, 66 (35%) patients were readmitted and 33 (17%) died (total patients readmitted or died, n = 82). Receipt of two (odds ratio [OR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.10–0.69) or more (three OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11–0.72; four OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03–0.50) care elements was associated with lower odds of 90-day readmission or 90-day mortality compared with zero or one element documented. Optimization of medications (no medication errors vs. one or more errors; OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21–0.92), documented functional or mental health assessments (physical function plus swallowing/mental health assessments vs. no assessments; OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.05–0.40), and documented goals of care or palliative care screening (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.25–1.05; not statistically significant) were associated with lower odds of 90-day readmission or 90-day mortality. Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort study of data from a single health system, we found variable delivery of recommended postsepsis care elements that were associated with reduced morbidity and mortality after hospitalization for sepsis. Implementation strategies to efficiently overcome barriers to adopting recommended postsepsis care may help improve outcomes for sepsis survivors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1513/annalsats.201907-514oc

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, S. P., Chou, S.-H., Sierra, M. F., Shuman, T. P., McWilliams, A. D., Taylor, B. T., Russo, M., Evans, S. L., Rossman, W., Murphy, S., Cunningham, K., & Kowalkowski, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Internal Medicine
  • Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation
  • Department of Hepatology, and
  • Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
  • Division of Hospital Medicine
Corresponding author
Taylor, Stephanie Parks
Venue
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2020-01-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
89-97
ISSN
  • 2325-6621 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-6933
OpenAlex
W2981808978
Cited by
69
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the American Thoracic Society (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
Keywords
sepsis survivors, guideline adherence, medication optimization, mental health screening, palliative care, goals of care, hospital readmission, 90-day mortality, care transitions, quality of care delivery, medication errors, post-discharge monitoring
MeSH terms
Transitional Care, Aged, Female, Medicare, Humans, Insurance Claim Review, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Patient Readmission, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States, Southeastern United States, Logistic Models, Survivors, Sepsis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review