What is Geyi, After All?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to Mair (2010), the original notion of geyi had nothing to do with the process of translation.
“According to Mair (2010), the original notion of geyi had nothing to do with the process of translation.”
Geyi was a technique to interpret Chinese Buddhist texts using non-Buddhist categories from Daoism or Confucianism.
“Geyi was a technique to interpret Chinese Buddhist texts using non-Buddhist categories from Daoism or Confucianism.”
Geyi was neither a common nor an important phenomenon in the translation process.
“Mair demonstrates that geyi was neither a common nor an important phenomenon in the translation process.”
From The Spread of Buddhism to China: A Re-examination of the Buddhist Interactions between Ancient India and China (2012) · cites this paper as Mair, 2010
Geyi was not a translation technique but an exegetical method.
“geyi was not a translation technique but an exegetical method”
From The Spread of Buddhism to China: A Re-examination of the Buddhist Interactions between Ancient India and China (2012) · cites this paper as Mair, 2010
Geyi was an extremely short-lived phenomenon.
“geyi was an extremely short-lived phenomenon”
From The Spread of Buddhism to China: A Re-examination of the Buddhist Interactions between Ancient India and China (2012) · cites this paper as Mair, 2010
Many of the Chinese terms used by the early translators cannot be characterized as Daoist.
“Mair also points out that many of the Chinese terms used by the early translators 'cannot be characterized as 'Daoist''.”
From The Spread of Buddhism to China: A Re-examination of the Buddhist Interactions between Ancient India and China (2012) · cites this paper as Mair, 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sen, T. (2012) · China Report · doi:10.1177/000944551104800202 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Mixing Metaphors: Translating the Indian Medical Doctrine Tridoa in Chinese Buddhist Sources
Salguero, C. P. (2010) · Asian Medicine · doi:10.1163/157342110x606860 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Bingenheimer, M. (2020) · Journal of the Japanese Association for Digital Humanities · doi:10.17928/jjadh.5.2_84 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Funayama, T. (2019) · Buddhism and the Dynamics of Transculturality · doi:10.1515/9783110413083-004
Contextualizing Buddhist Approaches to Religious Diversity
Zhiru, S. (2013) · Religious Diversity in Chinese Thought · doi:10.1057/9781137318503_7
- Authors
- Mair, V. H.
- Corresponding author
- Mair, Victor H.
- Venue
- Philosophy and Religion in Early Medieval China
- Publisher
- SUNY Press
- Published
- 2010-08-04
- Pages
- 227-264
- OpenAlex
- W4397015824
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- State University of New York Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Cultural and Mythological Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- Papuan languages
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
