Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Glyoxal and Methylglyoxal Levels in Diabetic Patients: Quantitative Determination by a New GC/MS Method

Lapolla, Annunziata, Flamini, Riccardo, Vedova, Antonio Dalla, Senesi, Antonella, Reitano, Rachele, Fedele, Domenico, Basso, Elisa, Seraglia, Roberta, Traldi, Pietro·2003·Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Abstract

Determination of glyoxal and methylglyoxal levels in plasma is of great interest, since it allows us to evaluate oxidation processes occurring in glycated proteins. A method based on a simple derivatization procedure followed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis has been developed. Ten diabetic patients were evaluated before and after improvement of glycemic control. Fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), advanced glycation end products (AGE), pentosidine, glyoxal and methylglyoxal levels were measured. The percentage decreases of the levels of fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c and AGE were larger than those of pentosidine, glyoxal and methylglyoxal. These results may be explained by considering the different position of these compounds in the Maillard reaction pathways: these two sets of metabolic parameters give different pictures of patients' metabolic control. The measurement of glyoxal and methylglyoxal may be particularly important in the evaluation of the possible effect of oxidative stress. Other metabolic pathways can contribute to glyoxal production, and the observed minor decrease in these compounds can be, in principle, ascribed to such effect. However, a similar behavior of pentosidine indicates that these alternative pathways can be only partially responsible for glyoxal and methylglyoxal production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/cclm.2003.180

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Lapolla, A., Flamini, R., Vedova, A. D., Senesi, A., Reitano, R., Fedele, D., Basso, E., Seraglia, R., & Traldi, P.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Published
2003-01-16
Volume
41
Issue
9
Pages
1166-73
ISSN
1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027470518
Cited by
288
References
20
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glyoxal and Methylglyoxal Levels in Diabetic Patients: Quantitative Determination by a New GC/MS Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/cclm.2003.180
The paper
Lapolla, A., Flamini, R., Vedova, A. D., Senesi, A., Reitano, R., Fedele, D., Basso, E., Seraglia, R., & Traldi, P. (2003). Glyoxal and Methylglyoxal Levels in Diabetic Patients: Quantitative Determination by a New GC/MS Method. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2003.180

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.