Cited by 25Advanced Glycation End Products researchRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesGout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid

Methylglyoxal: A Relevant Marker of Disease Activity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Open access
Knani, Ines, Bouzidi, Hassan, Zrour, Saoussen, Bergaoui, Naceur, Hammami, Mohamed, Kerkeni, Mohsen·2018·Disease Markers

Abstract

Background . The contribution of methylglyoxal (MGO) and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) in the presence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is still unknown. We investigated whether serum MGO and sRAGE were related to the presence of disease activity in RA. Methods . 80 patients with RA and 30 control subjects were included in a cross-sectional study. The severity of RA was assessed using the disease activity score for 28 joints (DAS28). Serum MGO and sRAGE were measured by ELISA. Results . Serum MGO levels were significantly higher in patients with RA versus control subjects ( P < 0.001 ) and were increased in RA patients with higher disease activity versus RA patients with moderate disease activity ( P = 0.019 ). Serum sRAGE concentrations were significantly decreased in RA patients with higher disease activity versus RA patients with moderate disease activity and versus control subjects ( P = 0.004 ; P = 0.002 , resp.). A multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that MGO was independently associated with the presence of activity disease in RA (OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02–1.31, P = 0.01 ). Conclusion . Serum MGO and sRAGE levels are inversely related to the activity of RA, and MGO is independently associated with a higher disease activity of RA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2018/8735926

Cites

43 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Serum pentosidine levels were higher in RA patients (n = 80) than in controls (n = 30), measured by ELISA.

    “| RA | Serum | Control subjects (n = 30) vs. RA patients (n = 80) | ELISA | Higher CML and pentosidine levels in RA patients | [237,238] |”

    From Protein oxidation - Formation mechanisms, detection and relevance as biomarkers in human diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [238]

    The Discussion says that CML and pentosidine were increased in RA, citing the authors’ earlier work. This paper studied 80 RA patients and 30 controls, but its Methods specify ELISA measurements of MGO and sRAGE, not pentosidine. It therefore does not establish that pentosidine was measured by ELISA or was higher in this particular cohort. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Serum CML levels were higher in RA patients (n = 80) than in controls (n = 30), measured by ELISA.

    “| RA | Serum | Control subjects (n = 30) vs. RA patients (n = 80) | ELISA | Higher CML and pentosidine levels in RA patients | [237,238] |”

    From Protein oxidation - Formation mechanisms, detection and relevance as biomarkers in human diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [238]

    The Discussion reports that CML levels were increased in RA, citing the authors’ earlier work. But this paper’s Methods and Results describe ELISA measurements of MGO and sRAGE—not CML—in its 80 RA patients and 30 controls. It therefore does not establish the claimed CML measurement for that cohort. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knani, I., Bouzidi, H., Zrour, S., Bergaoui, N., Hammami, M., & Kerkeni, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Monastir (TN)
  • Laboratory of Biochemistry, University Hospital Tahar Sfar, Mahdia, Tunisia
  • Hospital Fatuma Bourguiba Monastir (TN)
Corresponding author
Kerkeni, Mohsen
Venue
Disease Markers
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018
Volume
2018
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 0278-0240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8630
OpenAlex
W2788508712
Cited by
25
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Disease Markers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Monastir
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid
Keywords
methylglyoxal, rheumatoid arthritis, disease activity, soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products, serum biomarkers, DAS28, advanced glycation end products
MeSH terms
Adult, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pyruvaldehyde, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Logistic Models, Glycation End Products, Advanced

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review