The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants
Open accessAbstract
In studying second language (L2) fluency attainment, researchers typically address questions about temporal and hesitation phenomena in a descriptive manner, cataloguing which features appear under which learning circumstances. The goal of this paper is to present a perspective on L2 fluency that goes beyond description by exploring a potential explanatory framework for understanding L2 fluency. This framework focuses on the cognitive processing that underlies the manifestation of fluency and disfluency, and on the ways social context might contribute to shaping fluency attainment. The framework provides a dynamical systems perspective of fluency and its development, with specific consequences for a research program on L2 fluency. This framework gives rise to new questions because of its focus on the intimate link between cognitive fluency and utterance fluency, that is, between measures of the speed, efficiency and fluidity of the cognitive processes thought to underlie implementation of the speech act and measures of the oral fluency of that speech act. Moreover, it is argued that cognitive and utterance fluency need to be situated in the social context of communication in order to take into account the role played by the pragmatic and the sociolinguistic nature of communication in shaping L2 fluency development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020071 · Cited by 4,540
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721411429458 · Cited by 3,944
2. The L2 Motivational Self System
Dörnyei, Z. (2009) · Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self · doi:10.21832/9781847691293-003 · Cited by 2,052
Wing, E. A., Ritchey, M., & Cabeza, R. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00740 · Cited by 174
Chapter 6. Effects of task complexity and interaction on L2 performance
Michel, M. C. (2011) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.2.12ch6 · Cited by 114
Cited by
Tavakoli, P., & Hunter, A.-M. (2018) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168817708462 · Cited by 96
Kahng, J. (2020) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716420000065 · Cited by 62
Peltonen, P. (2017) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.08.009 · Cited by 54
PREDICTING L2 FLUENCY FROM L1 FLUENCY BEHAVIOR: THE CASE OF L1 TURKISH AND L2 ENGLISH SPEAKERS
Duran-Karaoz, Z., & Tavakoli, P. (2020) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263119000755 · Cited by 42
How does learners’ L2 utterance fluency relate to their L1? A meta‐analysis
Gao, J., & Sun, P. P. (2024) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12493 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Segalowitz, N.
- Venue
- International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2016-01-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0019-042X (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4141
- OpenAlex
- W2443925006
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 38.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.