The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Politeness and in-directness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests
Open accessAbstract
This paper provides some (more) insights into cross-cultural variation in speech act realization by analyzing English, German, Polish and Russian requests. It aims to shows that the relationship between indirectness and politeness is interpreted differently across cultures. Hence, the analysis focuses on the difference between direct requests, which have been said to play a central role in Polish and Russian, and conventionally indirect requests, which are the most frequent request type in English and German. It further shows that the examined languages exhibit culture-specific preferences for syntactic and lexical downgraders modifying the illocutionary force of the request and, thus, reducing the threat to the hearer's face. The requests analyzed in this study have been elicited by means of a discourse completion task and constitute responses to a scenario frequently used in previous request studies, so that the results can be compared with those established for other languages. The strong agreement among languages on the use of conventional indirectness in this scenario allows for testing the restricted applicability of interrogative constructions claimed for the two Slavic languages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage
Brown, P. (1987) · Cited by 11,894
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Leech, G. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315835976 · Cited by 7,359
(1979) · Expression and Meaning · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609213.004 · Cited by 1,393
Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction
Matisoff, J. A., & Wierzbicka, A. (1996) · Language · doi:10.2307/416282 · Cited by 971
Mills, S. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615238 · Cited by 906
Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different?
Blum-Kulka, S. (1987) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(87)90192-5 · Cited by 891 · cited 7×
“…conducted in the field of cross-cultural pragmatics illustrates culture-specific preferences in realizing requests (e. g., House and Kasper 1981; Blum-Kulka 1987, 1989; Blum-Kulka and House 1989; House 1989; Sifianou 1992; Fukushima 1996, 2000; Van Mulken 1996; Lubecka 2000; Ma´rquez Reiter…”
BackgroundInfluentialCross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction
Wierzbicka, A. (1991) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783112329764 · Cited by 888
Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts
Wierzbicka, A. (1985) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(85)90023-2 · Cited by 728
Metadata
- Authors
- Ogiermann, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1612-5681 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4877
- OpenAlex
- W2056548245
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 40.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Politeness and in-directness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/jplr.2009.011
- The paper
- Ogiermann, E. (2009). Politeness and in-directness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2009.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.