The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Regenerative medicine involves research in a number of fields and disciplines such as stem cell research, tissue engineering and biological therapy in general. As research in these areas advances rapidly, it is critical to keep abreast of emerging trends and critical turns of the development of the collective knowledge. AREAS COVERED: A progressively synthesized network is derived from 35,963 original research and review articles that cite 3875 articles obtained from an initial topic search on regenerative medicine between 2000 and 2011. CiteSpace is used to facilitate the analysis of the intellectual structure and emerging trends. EXPERT OPINION: A major ongoing research trend is concerned with finding alternative reprogramming techniques as well as refining existing ones for induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). A more recent emerging trend focuses on the structural and functional equivalence between iPSCs and human embryonic stem cells and potential clinical and therapeutic implications on regenerative medicine in a long run. The two trends overlap in terms of what they cite, but they are distinct and have different implications on future research. Visual analytics of the literature provides a valuable, timely, repeatable and flexible approach in addition to traditional systematic reviews so as to track the development of new emerging trends and identify critical evidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow
Jiang, Y., Jahagirdar, B. N., Reinhardt, R. L., Schwartz, R. E., Keene, C. D., Ortiz-Gonzalez, X. R., Reyes, M., Lenvik, T., Lund, T., Blackstad, M., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00870 · Cited by 5,518
RetractedCytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 · Cited by 51,888
Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · Cited by 26,673
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells
Pittenger, M. F., Mackay, A. M., Beck, S. C., Jaiswal, R. K., Douglas, R., Mosca, J. D., Moorman, M. A., Simonetti, D. W., Craig, S., & Marshak, D. R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5411.143 · Cited by 21,052
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors
Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., Narita, M., Ichisaka, T., Tomoda, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019 · Cited by 20,221
Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Blastocysts
Thomson, J. A., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Shapiro, S. S., Waknitz, M. A., Swiergiel, J. J., Marshall, V. S., & Jones, J. M. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5391.1145 · Cited by 15,926
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells
Yu, J., Vodyanik, M. A., Smuga-Otto, K., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J., Frane, J. L., Tian, S., Nie, J., Jonsdottir, G. A., Ruotti, V., Stewart, R., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151526 · Cited by 10,310
Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos
Evans, M. J., & Kaufman, M. H. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/292154a0 · Cited by 8,607
Chen, C. (2006) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20317 · Cited by 6,433
Self-citation
Cited by
Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Chen, C. (2017) · Journal of Data and Information Science · doi:10.1515/jdis-2017-0006 · Cited by 1,925
Self-citationEmerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: a scientometric update (2000 – 2014)
Chen, C., Dubin, R., & Kim, M. C. (2014) · Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy · doi:10.1517/14712598.2014.920813 · Cited by 837
Self-citationModified biochar: synthesis and mechanism for removal of environmental heavy metals
Liu, Z., Xu, Z., Xu, L., Buyong, F., Chay, T. C., Li, Z., Cai, Y., Hu, B., Zhu, Y., & Wang, X. (2022) · Carbon Research · doi:10.1007/s44246-022-00007-3 · Cited by 426
Climate change and tourism: a scientometric analysis using CiteSpace
Fang, Y., Yin, J., & Wu, B. (2018) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2017.1329310 · Cited by 405
Supply chain digitalization: past, present and future
Seyedghorban, Z., Tahernejad, H., Meriton, R., & Graham, G. (2020) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1631461 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., & Tseng, H.
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa Healthcare
- Published
- 2012-03-25
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 593-608
- ISSN
- 1471-2598 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7682
- OpenAlex
- W2104192199
- Cited by
- 1,364
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 10.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1517/14712598.2012.674507
- The paper
- Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., & Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2012.674507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
