Cited by 116Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsDrug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsProteins in Food Systems

Oral delivery of peptides and proteins using lipid-based drug delivery systems

Li, Ping, Nielsen, Hanne Mørck, Müllertz, Anette·2012·Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In order to successfully develop lipid-based drug delivery systems (DDS) for oral administration of peptides and proteins, it is important to gain an understanding of the colloid structures formed by these DDS, the mode of peptide and protein incorporation as well as the mechanism by which intestinal absorption of peptides and proteins is promoted. AREAS COVERED: The present paper reviews the literature on lipid-based DDS, employed for oral delivery of peptides and proteins and highlights the mechanisms by which the different lipid-based carriers are expected to overcome the two most important barriers (extensive enzymatic degradation and poor transmucosal permeability). This paper also gives a clear-cut idea about advantages and drawbacks of using different lipidic colloidal carriers ((micro)emulsions, solid lipid core particles and liposomes) for oral delivery of peptides and proteins. EXPERT OPINION: Lipid-based DDS are safe and suitable for oral delivery of peptides and proteins. Significant progress has been made in this area with several technologies on clinical trials. However, a better understanding of the mechanism of action in vivo is needed in order to improve the design and development of lipid-based DDS with the desired bioavailability and therapeutic profile.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/17425247.2012.717068

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, P., Nielsen, H. M., & Müllertz, A.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
Published
2012-08-17
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
1289-1304
ISSN
  • 1742-5247 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7593
OpenAlex
W2049764487
Cited by
116
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Mokslo, Inovaciju ir Technologiju Agentura
  • Danish Agency for Science and Higher Education
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
oral drug delivery, peptides, proteins, lipid-based drug delivery, microemulsions, liposomes, enzymatic degradation, intestinal absorption, bioavailability
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Biological Availability, Drug Carriers, Emulsions, Humans, Intestinal Absorption, Lipids, Liposomes, Peptides, Permeability, Proteins, Drug Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review