The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Planning, Shared Mental Models, and Coordinated Performance: An Empirical Link Is Established
Abstract
Critical decisions are made every day by teams of individuals who must coordinate their activities to achieve effectiveness. Researchers recently suggested that a shared mental model (SMM) among team members may help them to make successful decisions. Several avenues for developing SMMs in teams exist, one of which is planning. We explored the relationship between team planning, SMMs, and coordinated team decision making and performance. Results indicated that effective planning increased the SMM among team members, allowed them to utilize efficient communication strategies during high-workload conditions, and resulted in improved coordinated team performance. In addition, the communication strategy alone affected the degree of coordinated performance attained by teams during periods of increased workload. Implications of these results and team functioning are discussed. Actual or potential applications of this research include performance and training in settings that require interdependent actions among operators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x · Cited by 2,623
Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 · Cited by 2,273
Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork?
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496405277134 · Cited by 1,930
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659
Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People
Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0069 · Cited by 553
Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Myers, C. W., & Duran, J. L. (2013) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12009 · Cited by 522
Miller, C. A., & Parasuraman, R. (2007) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872007779598037 · Cited by 434
Knowledge integration: a key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation
Godemann, J. (2008) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504620802469188 · Cited by 213
Alliance management teams and entrainment: Sharing temporal mental models
Standifer, R., & Bluedorn, A. (2006) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726706067596 · Cited by 99
The effects of virtualness on teamwork behavioral components: The role of shared mental models
Schmidtke, J. M., & Cummings, A. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.011 · Cited by 61
Managing emergencies and abnormal situations in air traffic control (part II): Teamwork strategies
Malakis, S., Kontogiannis, T., & Kirwan, B. (2010) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.018 · Cited by 53
Playing at Planning: Game Design Patterns from Disaster Response Practice
Toups Dugas, P. O., Hamilton, W. A., & Alharthi, S. A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play · doi:10.1145/2967934.2968089 · Cited by 26
Rosen, M. A., & Dietz, A. S. (2017) · The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Team Working and Collaborative Processes · doi:10.1002/9781118909997.ch21 · Cited by 26
Gross, N., & Kluge, A. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343414540656 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Milanovich, D. M.
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-71
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W2104448496
- Cited by
- 669
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
